Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Refusing to Marry Same-Sex Couples Isn’t Religious Freedom, It’s Just Discrimination
The Daily Beast ^ | October 23, 2014 | Sally Kohn

Posted on 10/26/2014 9:58:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A ‘Christian’ wedding chapel—a private business—in Idaho is suing for the right not to marry gay couples. There is no such right. Yet.

The first thing you need to know is that most “wedding chapels” are not actually chapels. They are private businesses, sometimes run by ordained ministers who are thus licensed to perform marriage ceremonies, but just as often run by Elvis impersonators. Thus, the question of how marriage-equality laws apply to private wedding chapels is ostensibly a question of under what circumstances the government can lawfully step on a for-profit company’s blue suede shoes.

Ground zero for this debate is now Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. There, the city is apparently requiring the Hitching Post Lakeside Chapel to officiate gay weddings. Now, it’s hard to imagine any gay couple wanting to get married at the Hitching Post Lakeside Chapel. Their website talks about “the difference between men and women” and says “women respond to love positively because they were created that way” and “men respond to respect because that is the way they are created.”

Yeah. And the private “chapel” reportedly gives its newlyweds a conservative Christian CD with hetero-reinforcing marriage sermons. Then again, given the über-butch Paul Bunyan log-cabin façade, if some gay men mistook the Hitching Post Lakeside Chapel for a for a Western bar, that would be understandable....

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: christians; dailybeast; gaymarriage; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; homosexualmarriage; idaho; lavendermafia; liberalfascism; moralabsolutes; sallykohn; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Nextrush

The second part of my comment is that they do not have the right to enforce justice against those who did nothing to them.

Sexual abuse is an individual offense. The individual abuser chooses to engage in it. The victim does not have the right to punish the innocent, no matter that they are a victim.

Studies have indicated that childhood sexual abuse appears to be correlated with LGBT self-identification. However, that does not give LGBT activists the right to take away others’ “unalienable rights”.

By choosing to try and steal those rights, the LGBT activist does indeed warrant anger and derision. It is not because they were harmed by abuse, but because they have selected a course of action that requires that natural rights be denied to others in order to support their sexual proclivity.

If you honestly believe that historical abuse excuses the current actions of these people, I think you may wish to revisit the biblical teachings on loving the sinner but hating the sin. In this case - the sin is even more egregious because it causes others to sin in complying with the demands.

Thank you for engaging in this debate without making it rancorous. I hope I have achieved the same goal in my own words.


41 posted on 10/27/2014 5:14:46 AM PDT by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

People are, or should be, free to associate and deal with whomever they want. And not deal with whom they chose not. We’d all get along a lot better if the government would keep out of it and let folks sort it out themselves.
Guess what, not everybody in the world is going to like you. Grow up and face it.


42 posted on 10/27/2014 5:22:17 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; LUV W

Wow! Her competent for those Idahoans just OOZES off the page


43 posted on 10/27/2014 5:49:25 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
How does making a profit instantly neutralize religious freedom?

It doesn't. This is unconstitutional. Ministers in "non-profit" churches are given a fee for their services in a wedding all the time....there just isn't a contract, usually. If this stands, regular churches will be next.
44 posted on 10/27/2014 5:59:39 AM PDT by Girlene (Hey NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; KC_Lion

In her picture, she looks like a lesbo.

She clearly hates Christians.


45 posted on 10/27/2014 6:04:59 AM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris, Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL Vets, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

“King Henry VIII created the Church of England, an “establishment of religion” to force conformity to his liberal view of sex and marriage.”

Not really. The reformation was a movement by God, in the people, happening all over the Countries of the West.

1. The people largely aligned with the reformation. Wycliffe and Lollardy were over a hundred years old. Wycliffe inspired John Huss, who inspired Luther. Luther’s books were studied in England at least by 1521.William Tyndale’s English New Testament was in England by April of 1526.
2. The monasteries and the church in England were quite corrupt and consuming the wealth of the nation. In 1525 Cromwell helped suppress 29 monasteries, two years before Henry is sure he want to divorce Catherine.
3. Control. Spain and the relationship to the pope was problematic
4. Protestant reformation was supported by Thomas Cromwell Henry’s key advisor, and some bishops like Hugh Latimer

But surely the militant sodomites and the anti-Christ are trying to push immorality on us.


46 posted on 10/27/2014 6:51:43 AM PDT by Prophet2520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I love the comments on the article. Her view is totally destroyed, every line jot and tittle — by the comments. She is exposed as the Gay Gestapo Nazi she is.


47 posted on 10/27/2014 6:58:09 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

I don’t accept the negative actions of the LGBT people, their resentment, fear and revenge against those they call ‘haters’, ‘homophobes’ etc.

One can’t use sex abuse as an excuse for doing wrong to others.

Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict both visited with victims of abuse to offer what they could to them.

I think its important for people of all faiths to understand professing religious people of all faiths including clergy and even lay people have inflicted damage on LGBT people and others because they have been involved in acts of sexual abuse, not to mention anger and rage towards family members and others in general, some of whom end up coming out at LGBT or are currently LGBT.

I am responsible for my wrongdoing to others and I must face the ‘truth about myself’.

If I can do something to make amends or do acts of kindness I should, even if it results in a slap in the face from the other side.

I also fully support protecting the Constitution including the First Amendment in particular that is threated by the LGBT activists.....

When religious people get the “Jew” treatment of early 1930’s Germany I cannot remain silent and neither can you.

That has happened, is happened and will happen in the days and months ahead for sure.


48 posted on 10/27/2014 7:22:46 AM PDT by Nextrush (OBAMACARE IS A BAILOUT FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why haven’t the sodomites demanded the same from the local mosque, I wonder.


49 posted on 10/27/2014 7:32:32 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

http://www.blessedcause.org/protest/Gay%20Manifesto.htm

Michael Swift’s Gay Manifesto was first published in February 1987 and was titled “Gay Revolutionary.” It was reprinted in the Congressional Record without the opening line describing it as an “eruption of inner rage on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”

The opening line is included below. The rest is public record. Knowing that this is a “desperate dream” and printed in one of the largest homosexual publishing circulations in 1987, hardly supports the defense that this is a satire, especially when one considers how much has come to pass since it was published.

There is a difference between a homosexual and a homosexual movement. God loves all of us, we all have sinned and while we were yet sinners, yet He loves us. It has been difficult for all Christians to stand up to this movement because no one wants to point out the sins of others. But while we are so carefully being quiet, outrageous teachings have been attempted in our public schools. Pastors have been threatened with lawsuits, small businesses are being forced to participate in activities they would rather not cater because it is against our faith. Did anyone really want a pastor to be forced to marry them or was/is there an agenda to be had?

Our children are targeted. It is not easy to post this and I have been threatened, but I cannot sit down and be silent while the wolves come for our children.

********

This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence—will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.


50 posted on 10/27/2014 7:33:03 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

http://www.blessedcause.org/protest/Gay%20Manifesto.htm

Michael Swift’s Gay Manifesto was first published in February 1987 and was titled “Gay Revolutionary.” It was reprinted in the Congressional Record without the opening line describing it as an “eruption of inner rage on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”

The opening line is included below. The rest is public record. Knowing that this is a “desperate dream” and printed in one of the largest homosexual publishing circulations in 1987, hardly supports the defense that this is a satire, especially when one considers how much has come to pass since it was published.

There is a difference between a homosexual and a homosexual movement. God loves all of us, we all have sinned and while we were yet sinners, yet He loves us. It has been difficult for all Christians to stand up to this movement because no one wants to point out the sins of others. But while we are so carefully being quiet, outrageous teachings have been attempted in our public schools. Pastors have been threatened with lawsuits, small businesses are being forced to participate in activities they would rather not cater because it is against our faith. Did anyone really want a pastor to be forced to marry them or was/is there an agenda to be had?

Our children are targeted. It is not easy to post this and I have been threatened, but I cannot sit down and be silent while the wolves come for our children.

********

This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence—will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.


51 posted on 10/27/2014 7:33:03 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

My doctor refuses to perform a hysterectomy on me, using the excuse that I’m a man. Anybody know a good lawyer I can get to sue him for discriminating against me?


52 posted on 10/27/2014 7:35:17 AM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet2520

Henry VIII was a human being with his own selfish motives that are obvious.

H 8 went after Thomas More in the early 1530’s, who did not recognize his marriage to Anne Boelyn. More did not support the request to the Pope for the annulment of the marriage to Catherine.

This is the time period when the C of E was formed...Its also important to note the King was taking over the church to remove the Pope from being the authority and the teachings of the Pope about marriage which allowed annullment but not at will.....

I’M NOT HERE TO SAY WHO WAS RIGHT OR WRONG REGARDING FAITH, BUT IN POLITICAL TERMS THERE WAS A CONFLICT GOING ON JUST LIKE THE ONE WE ARE IN TODAY......

A human being with power wanted his view in sex and marriage upheld and the religious authority stood in the way.....


53 posted on 10/27/2014 7:46:01 AM PDT by Nextrush (OBAMACARE IS A BAILOUT FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Leftists have been changing the meaning of words since the foundation of their ideology/religion with the words “hat God really said...”


54 posted on 10/27/2014 7:47:29 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

That’s the whole point - criminalizing Christianity.

All the issues used to accomplish that goal are secondary and will be abandoned when no longer useful.


55 posted on 10/27/2014 7:48:46 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

but if I can show love and kindness to the LGBT people in my daily life I will take the opportunity to do so, they are broken and hurt people with many extracting revenge in their pain with political extremism.

...that’s all fine and dandy, and your point is reasonably presented...the trouble is you’re endowing Big Gay, which does not at all consist of broken and hurt people, but of those who are culturally committed to the imposition of secular ‘virtues’ on the populace at large, with a mantle of empathy for their ‘struggles’, which they neither need, nor do they want...

...if the only issue concerned the private lives of homosexuals, and their tortured self scrutiny due to their disordered nature, your point would be required reading...

...but...


56 posted on 10/27/2014 8:10:57 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

“Since when do homos have the power to redefine words?”

Since “gay”.


57 posted on 10/27/2014 8:20:48 AM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Very good, very good point. I’m going to remember that one.


58 posted on 10/27/2014 8:47:20 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They could bring a minister/justice who wouldn’t mind marrying them. Then donate the profits to Westboro Baptist Church.


59 posted on 10/27/2014 9:51:44 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (AGW-e is the climate "Domino Theory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Fanatics will probably not be receptive to kindness, I admit. But I must do good in my dealings with people.

Even when I was a drunken religious activist I still remember shaking hands at least with a local gay leader who later died too young.....

But I must have a right attitude in my dealings with other people and I also must not endorse the prosecution and persecution of religious people that the LGBT fanatics intend to implement and have begun to implement using governmental power and media driven intimidation.

I also have to deal with LGBT people on the basis of any harm I did to them in the past. If I was a religious hypocrite who sexually absued a child who grew up to be LGBT(that’s not my past but for others?) I would especially be concerned about admitting my wrong and trying to make amends in that area. Its not an easy thing since the criminal justice is very geared up to deal out punishment, so I apologize for sounding too preachy and or self-righteous myself.

Being drunk as I grew up disconnected me from men and women in my life including at least one who became gay. I at least have written down where I felt I was wrong in that relationship.
I find that kind of action appropriate.


60 posted on 10/27/2014 10:00:56 AM PDT by Nextrush (OBAMACARE IS A BAILOUT FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson