Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Catholic Caucus] Mel's marriage is annulled ... by his own dad
Woman's Day (Australia) ^ | 8/3/2009

Posted on 08/04/2009 5:43:44 AM PDT by markomalley

No wonder Mel Gibson is giving the thumbs-up. Full time has been called on his 28-year marriage to Robyn Moore. The Pope didn't give the order, though. That edict came from Mel's 90-year-old father Hutton Gibson, and it paves the way for his son to marry his pregnant Russian girlfriend Oksana Grigorieva by Christmas.

Having had his request turned down by Catholic bishops, Mel, 53, pleaded his case in front of a tribunal of members from the Church of the Holy Family, his breakaway Catholic church in Malibu.

Hutton, who once studied for the priesthood only to leave before he was ordained, presided over the hearing. He granted Mel's annulment request after his son presented evidence that his union to Robyn, 53, was never a true marriage — even though they wed in a Catholic ceremony in Australia in June 1980.

"Especially important was Mel's description of how he felt pressured into the marriage in the first place because Robyn was pregnant," a family insider says.

"Those feelings indicated to Hutton that it couldn't have been a true marriage, and so he felt it must be invalid.

"After the discussion ended, Hutton pounded his fist on the table and said, ‘It is true that this union did not have what it takes to be a true marriage.'"

The family are at pains to keep the annulment, which took place a month after Robyn filed for divorce in April, a secret — but maybe not too secret.

"Mel hopes some of the bishops he has befriended recently can be persuaded to give him a proper Catholic annulment," the insider says.

Either way, Mel is forging ahead with plans for a Christmas wedding to Oksana, 39, despite her cold feet over his recent behaviour, which includes gambling escapades in Las Vegas.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Ministry/Outreach; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: adulterer; apostate; catholic; kennedyesque; melgibson; sedevacanist; toldyouso
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: growingpains
I am Catholic and the annulment is just the Catholic Church’s way of getting around a divorce. If you have the money, you get one.

Only in the US - something like 90% of the American annulments which are appealed to Rome get overturned. The tribunals here are annulment mills, but not in the rest of the world.

21 posted on 08/04/2009 6:06:29 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
The church made their own rules. A friend of mine got her marriage annulled....All you gotta do is PAY!!

Don't comment on something (church annulment) you obviously don't understand. A church annulment is not the same as a civil annulment. Same goes for the comments from others on this thread that he had his "kids annulled".

That is not what church annulment does. The children are legitimate. A church annulment (and don't count Mel's breakaway church as representative of the Catholic church) says that one, or the other,or both, parties to the marriage had an impediment (mental or physical) that made a true marriage impossible.

An annulment is granted only after a Church Tribunal hears and studies all the evidence, and it's a lengthy process. The party seeking the annulment has to gather the evidence, including written testimony from parents and others who knew the couple before and after the marriage took place.

The money you talk about is NOT a bribe as many imply. The money pays for copies of all the paperwork and the associated court costs and can be very little. My daughter's annulment cost around $250 in Seattle about 16 years ago. The Tribunal appointed an attorney to represent her. In her case, her husband was mentally ill and had not disclosed that fact before the marriage. He also had undergone a vasectomy before he met her and had not disclosed that fact either.

Another little known fact. The Church does not deliberate on an annulment until the couple already has been granted a civil divorce. And another complication is that the Church will not consider an annulment unless BOTH parties file their paperwork, or at least sign off on the process. In my daughter's case signing off was merely that her ex returned teh papers with "Don't bother me about this" scrawled across them and his signature at the bottom. That proved that he had received the papers and that was enough to start the process.

And she sought the annulment on the advice of several different priests. It was a bad situation.

22 posted on 08/04/2009 6:15:28 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Didn't Teddy Kennedy get an annualment at some time?
23 posted on 08/04/2009 6:15:55 AM PDT by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

IN MY OPINION, The whole process is a farce!!!! My friend’s was over $1000. She said she wouldn’t do it again!!


24 posted on 08/04/2009 6:26:28 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mware
I remember James Caviezel, on an interview once saying, You don't expect to make a movie on the Passion and not get some of it handed to you. Mel has the demons working on him overtime.

My thoughts exactly.

25 posted on 08/04/2009 6:36:34 AM PDT by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

It’s funny, that on many other threads, when people talk about wanting to see a movie and then finding out something about the producer/director/actor’s personal life or political leanings, they consider the movies no good, won’t even watch them, and actually hope they fail.


26 posted on 08/04/2009 7:00:00 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

The number of children has nothing to do with the validity of the marriage.

I don’t assume Acorn is a legitimate enterprise just because they get millions of signatures and voter registration cards every election.


27 posted on 08/04/2009 7:07:19 AM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

You wrote:

“The church made their own rules. A friend of mine got her marriage annulled....All you gotta do is PAY!!”

False. The court costs are low. If you can’t pay them, you don’t have to. I know someone who was so financially strapped by her divorce that she paid NOTHING for the annulment court costs.

Also, some people have taken cases all the way to Rome...and have been turned down flat. Most people throughout history were turned down as a matter of fact.


28 posted on 08/04/2009 7:09:18 AM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: growingpains

You wrote:

“I agree. I am Catholic and the annulment is just the Catholic Church’s way of getting around a divorce.”

No, that’s logically impossible.

“If you have the money, you get one.”

Nope. If you have a legitimate case you’ll get one. Can you name a recent case where money clearly made the difference? Joseph P. Kennedy II had money - lots of it. It apparently did him no good. Napoleon couldn’t even get a legitimate annulment from the Church and had or forced clergy to him make one up with no authority. And decades ago, Princess Chalotte of Monaco? Turned down. Count de Castellane? Turned down. James Walker, one time mayor of New York? Turned down. I know there are other famous, rich people who’ve been turned down.

Every case of annulment I have ever learned the facts about seemed like a legitimate case to me.


29 posted on 08/04/2009 7:24:29 AM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mware

Mel has the demons working on him overtime.

He sure does.....Jim Cavziel has manged to keep it sall together, but Mel was addicted to the *Drink* that allows Satan to do some terrible things to you...


30 posted on 08/04/2009 7:35:04 AM PDT by TaraP (*Religion* is Man trying to reach GOD.Christ is GOD reaching out to Man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Perhaps it is time for an honest discussion about the annulment process.

Why can we not admit that once healthy marriages can for whatever reason die?
Why can't we let go of the ghost of Henry VIII and allow a divorce.
Why can we not admit that in many cases, not all, the current Church annulment process is dishonest. True or false, many if not most people think it is a “pay to play” scheme. As well intentioned as were the original efforts, it has not worked in all too many instances.

31 posted on 08/04/2009 7:53:49 AM PDT by VidMihi ("In fide, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
While you did not indicate how long your daughter was married, ( I suspect it was a short time )from what you say there is little question your daughter's marriage was properly annulled by the Church. The problem does not arise in such cases as yours, but in marriages of many years, many children, and much parish involvements. (CFM, CCD etc)
32 posted on 08/04/2009 8:04:43 AM PDT by VidMihi ("In fide, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

I heard some grumbling about Kerry’s annulment during the 2004 campaign. According to you it sounds like there could have been good reasons — and I may have been impugning the man.

Do you know what the facts were behind his annulment? I’m curious as to why he was granted one. I guess I could just go to Google but I’m lazy. LOL.


33 posted on 08/04/2009 8:05:26 AM PDT by rom (Israel got Saul before they got David. Where's our David?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

LOL. If she has to get *another* annulment in another marriage, she probably has bigger problems than money.


34 posted on 08/04/2009 8:07:44 AM PDT by rom (Israel got Saul before they got David. Where's our David?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
“Antisemitic loon has long term marriage with seven children “annulled” by holocaust denier dad”

If he felt pressure to marry his first wife because she was pregnant, and that was the reason it wasn't a “real” marriage; what about the pregnant girlfriend he is in a rush to marry before she births? Will that one not be “real” after a few decades because of the “pressure”?

I guess you cannot expect crazy people to start making sense.

35 posted on 08/04/2009 8:12:46 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Is this informal church “tribunal” authoritative under ecclesiastical law?


36 posted on 08/04/2009 9:36:26 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VidMihi

5 years. She did not give up on him easily. He was a sociopath. When she finally threw in the towel (after he said he really didn’t want to be married) his parents said, “We’re surprised that you didn’t give up on him a long time ago. We’re amazed that it lasted this long.” No children for the reasons stated above.


37 posted on 08/04/2009 9:52:25 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

There is no such thing as an “informal church tribunal”. It’s very formal and is operated by the Diocese under the authority of Rome. They appoint Dioscesan attorneys to represent the plaintiff. If the defendent wants an attorney, I’m sure they would appoint one for the defendent too. Of course, that increases the cost.

The only time the decision goes to Rome is when there is a dispute, and one of the parties does not want the annulment. Then the decision can be appealed to Rome, whether the Tribunal decided yes, or no.

The Diocesan marriage tribunal uses lay people to decide the case. There are psychologists involved and attorneys and transcriptionists and notaries. Lots of paper work. It’s a big deal.


38 posted on 08/04/2009 10:02:24 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

From observations on someone close to me, the process asks some very uncomfortable and probing questions that forces people to face things about themselves and their life. It requires those seeking the annulment and those near to them to fill very long questionnaires. It was not a burden financially either.

It may vary from diocese to diocese too. The person I knew was in St. Louis right around the end of Bishop Regali’s term there and as bishop he is very faithful in his duties.


39 posted on 08/04/2009 10:13:04 AM PDT by Flying Circus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Never trust a man who becomes his own pope. Mel’s “Church” sounds like Petoria.


40 posted on 08/04/2009 10:15:50 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson