Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Mormon Brothers?
Reformed Evangelist ^ | May 14th, 2007 | Jeff Fuller

Posted on 07/05/2007 3:00:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

Mormon Evangelists

The following draws from the book Is the Mormon My Brother by apologist James White. Earlier this year, Paul Kaiser reprinted a Worldview article titled 10 Mormonism Facts which generated a myriad of responses from visitors who stated that Mormons were being misrepresented and are simply our brothers & sisters in the Body of Christ. Let’s look at what Dr. White presents using LDS resources:

The First Vision

Without question the key revelation in Mormon Scripture regarding the nature of God is to be found in what is known as the First Vision of Joseph Smith. The vision itself is fundamental to all of LDS theology. Mormon Apostle Bruce R. McConkie described the vision:

That glorious theophany which took place in the spring of 1820 and which marked the opening of the dispensation of the fullness of times is called the First Vision. It is rated as first both from the standpoint of time and of pre-eminent importance. In it Joseph Smith saw and conversed with the Father and the Son, both of which exalted personages were personally present before him as he lay enwrapped in the Spirit and overshadowed by the Holy Ghost.

This transcendent vision was the beginning of latter day revelation; it marked the opening of the heavens after the long night of apostate darkness; with it was ushered in the great era of restoration, the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. (Acts 3:21.) Through it the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens, and because of it the truth about those Beings whom it is life eternal to know began again to be taught among men. (John 17:3.) With this vision came the call of that Prophet who, save Jesus only, was destined to do more for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived in it. (D. & C. 135:3.) This vision was the most important event that had taken place in all world history from the day of Christ’s ministry to the glorious hour when it occurred.(1)

And Mormon Prophet Ezra Taft Benson said,

Joseph Smith, a prophet of God, restored the knowledge of God. Joseph’s first vision clearly revealed that the Father and Son are separate personages, having bodies as tangible as mans. Later it was also revealed that the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit, separate and distinct from the personalities of the Father and the Son. (See D&C 130:22.) This all-important truth shocked the world even though sustained by the Bible. (2)

How is it that the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens and the knowledge of God was restored by this one vision? While the story is as familiar to Mormons as John 3:16 is to Christians, we present Joseph Smith’s own recounting of the story in full, taken from the LDS Scriptures (and hence carrying canonical authority). However, we note that the account that appears in the LDS Scriptures was written in 1838, eighteen years after the events described:

14 So, in accordance with this, my determination to ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the morning of a beautiful, clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and twenty. It was the first time in my life that I had made such an attempt, for amidst all my anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt to pray vocally.

15 After I had retired to the place where I had previously designed to go, having looked around me, and finding myself alone, I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon bysome power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction.

16 But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being just at this moment of great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!

18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)–and which I should join.

19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong;(3) and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.

20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, Never mind, all is well I am well enough off. I then said to my mother, I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true. It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me, almost in my infancy? (Joseph Smith History 1:14-20).

What does this vision, recorded in LDS Scripture, teach concerning God? First and foremost, it presents to us the concept of a plurality of gods. This arises from the fact that God the Father is a separate and distinct physical entity from Jesus Christ, His Son. God the Father is possessed of a physical body, as is the Son. This is why McConkie can claim the creeds of Christendom were smashed to smithereens, for the vision has always been interpreted by the LDS leadership to teach that God the Father is a separate and distinct person and being from the Son. The unity of Being that is central to Christian theology is completely denied by Joseph Smith in the First Vision. Hence, you have one God, the Father, directing Smith to another God, the Son.

While it is not our intention to critique these teachings at this point, it should be noted that there are a number of problems with the First Vision, and with the entire development of the LDS concept of God as well. As we noted, this version of the First Vision was not written until 1838. Previous versions, however, differed in substantial details from this final and official account. Most significantly, the presence of both the Father and the Son as separate and distinct gods is not a part of the earlier accounts.(4)

————————————————-

(1) Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine,2nd ed., rev. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 284-285, LDSCL.

(2) Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988), p. 4, LDSCL. On page 101 of the same book, we read this strong statement:

The first vision of the Prophet Joseph Smith is bedrock theology to the Church. The adversary knows this and has attacked Joseph Smith’s credibility from the day he announced the visitation of the Father and the Son. You should always bear testimony to thetruth of the First Vision. Joseph Smith did see the Father and the Son. They conversed with him as he said they did. Any leader who, without reservation, cannot declare his testimony that God and Jesus Christ appeared to Joseph Smith can never be a true leader, a true shepherd. If we do not accept this truth if we have not received a witness about this great revelationwe cannot inspire faith in those whom we lead.

(3) One of Mormonism’s leading scholars, James Talmage (and a General Authority), said the following in the General Conference of April, 1920:

This Church, therefore, from its beginning, has been unique, for the organization of the Church was forecasted in this declaration that at the time of Joseph Smiths first vision there was no Church of Jesus Christ upon the earth; and I do not see why people should take issue with us for making that statement (CR1920Apr:103).

(4) I noted a number of the historical problems with Mormonism in Letters to a Mormon Elder, pp. 88-106. For a fuller treatment of this issue, see H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, Inventing Mormonism (Salt Lake: Smith Research Associates, 1994), pp.1-41, and Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? (Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1982), pp. 143-162.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: apologetics; boggsforgovernor; brothers; christianity; lds; mormon; mormonism; orthodoxy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800801-820821-840 ... 1,341 next last
To: Elsie

Yes, Bryce has stunning views. Several years ago we did a night hike down to Queen’s Garden, and then at midnight under the full moon, hiked back up Navajo trail. It’s an experience I will never forget. The stars were so close. It was just beautiful.


801 posted on 07/12/2007 10:06:32 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
If he was born how could he exist before he existed?

Once you are free of time there is never a time that you did not exist, for you could always travel there.

I know from your posts you don't get this, but temporal mechanics prove that God could become God and always exist. It's not one or the other no matter how often you state that it is.

The rest, drivel, sorry but that's my opinion...

DU
802 posted on 07/12/2007 10:21:50 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: Greg F; Elsie

My ward did a trek to commemorate the Mormon pioneers coming to the Salt Lake Valley in 1847 (this was in 1997.) We were all dressed in pioneer garb and had a few handcarts. Middle of July in Utah.

Not to point any fingers, but the men looked at the map, but didn’t bring the map because they could remember where we were to go. A 2 mile trek turned into a 17 mile death march. We had kids dropping like flies due to heat exertion and dehydration. They even sent out the Search and Rescue squad. We were sooo relieved to see the trucks. There were no lasting effects from the trek, but those leaders learned that perhaps they should bring along maps next time.

Any time I mention that trek to anyone who was on it, we all turn green. LOL.


803 posted on 07/12/2007 10:22:32 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Edward Watson
I think whatever Mormon called that particular "genie" out of the lamp got a little more than they bargained for, LOL.

I pinged Edward because I used a clip from his web site, it's the polite thing to do, then I went on a Bus trip for a couple of days, and I must say what I thought was a "Dying thread" certainly picked up and ran, WOW.

I must also say Edward was right on his doctrinal points, but with all you guys banging on him at once, and no other Mormons on here posting, I can see why he might get how was it put earlier? "het up" As for me, I have been through many of these, and don't get "het up" about it any more.

IMHO you guys all went a little crazy there, but hey your posts are up to you, so knock your selves out (not literally...)

DU
804 posted on 07/12/2007 10:31:19 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
It is a damnable heresy to say that God was once a man. It is a damnable heresy to say that men can become God. Christians are literally repulsed by the arrogance and blasphemy of those two statements.

Then they do not know the history of their religion.

DU
805 posted on 07/12/2007 10:33:16 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Great story about hiking alone. They wouldn’t drink the water because it had specks in it? LOL. Last week I was cooking dinner and the wind came up. Not too much dirt, but the pine trees started dropping baby pine cones (about an inch long) everywhere. I just picked them out of the chicken I was warming up and no one was the wiser. :)


806 posted on 07/12/2007 10:35:30 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 769 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
On another note, I have wondered what the LDS official position is on the Harry Potter movies?...I love them, but they do involve a lot of witchcraft.

No official position on the Harry Potter books or movies. They are hugely popular in Utah. My niece is a big fan. It is killing her that her family is on vacation right now and she couldn't go to the premiere of the movie.

807 posted on 07/12/2007 10:36:48 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

I know you have a metaphysical feeling that it makes sense to say that you can be born, become a God, and therefore always exist. The only problem is that it is illogical. To be born you need to be in time, not out of it, time exists, therefore there is a before.


808 posted on 07/12/2007 10:38:15 AM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl

Very funny with your pioneer trek. Our men had the map on our hike in the Badlands. We just looked at the map only, not the warnings on the back it. Hey, with responsability comes endless ribbing after you mess up.


809 posted on 07/12/2007 10:41:46 AM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: Enosh
Now look what you did, you ruined our campfire moment.

Sorry, I was just trying to catch up after a Business trip. Apparently I was so missed by you all that you imagined I was Edward Watson, it's OK, I'm back now, you can all relax...
810 posted on 07/12/2007 10:56:57 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 716 | View Replies]

To: Enosh
Group snicker time!

It's always time for a Snickers!

Wait...(grin)

DU
811 posted on 07/12/2007 10:58:11 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
From an 'ancient' commercial "Parts of the Pine Tree are edible." I wonder if you had just cook them in, would you have gotten kudos for your 'new dish being served'? LOL
812 posted on 07/12/2007 10:58:56 AM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

LOL. It would have added some crunch to the meal.

And it was amazing to see the chipmunks come in herds as soon as we pulled out any food. They’re so friendly they would run underneath the campstove I was cooking on. Hmmm, squirrel for dinner?


813 posted on 07/12/2007 11:00:57 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
I am so sorry, I wish you the comfort of Jesus, and the knowledge that you will not be alone in the hereafter.

Thanks UG for helping us put things into a little better perspective.

DU
814 posted on 07/12/2007 11:02:34 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
For the purpose of moderating a religious debate on this forum - it does not matter whether the poster is "for" or "against" a particular belief - as long as the thread is "open." It is not derogatory to be "anti" something. I do not consider the term "anti" to be "making it personal" unless the poster is attributing motives which have not been declared by the Freeper targeted by the claim.

For instance, "your anti-atheist position..." may not be making it personal, if you have made it clear that you are against atheism.

On the other hand, if someone is attributing motives to you - and not merely summing up your position - let them know and ping me because that would be "making it personal."

Pinging myself to your clarification on the rules. Thanks, RM.

815 posted on 07/12/2007 11:03:24 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (As heard on the Amish Radio Network! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1675029/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser; colorcountry; All

I would appreciate it if you (DU and CC) could answer the following questions.

1. If your beliefs are correct what will it cost you? What will you gain? What’s the emotional payoff?

2. If your beliefs are not correct what will you lose? Are you diminished by losing? What is the cost, not only to you but to others?

3. If both of your beliefs are incorrect what will it cost you and others? Will you regret the time you have spent arguing?

Thanks


816 posted on 07/12/2007 11:06:09 AM PDT by Truth-Miner (The Child in us desires Truth to bend to our perspective, may we all be Adults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 805 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl; Osage Orange
That many chipmonks means not enough sankes in the area. I think I'd like that area!

The 'dark region' in OK sounds very appealing, Osage O. I think I'll look at putting that on my 'trek map' for my coming drive West.

817 posted on 07/12/2007 11:06:53 AM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 813 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

It is a big comfort to know that. And to know that we can dwell with Christ and Heavenly Father for eternity.


818 posted on 07/12/2007 11:08:11 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 814 | View Replies]

To: Truth-Miner

My wife is making sushi for lunch, just heard the Timer on the rice cooker go off. Not all good food hardens the arteries...


819 posted on 07/12/2007 11:09:34 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: Truth-Miner
1. If your beliefs are correct what will it cost you? What will you gain? What’s the emotional payoff?

These questions are WAY too big to be answered in this space. That is why DU, others and I keep having these extended coversations. I have posted thousands of posts regarding the issue of whether or no the LDS religion is part of the Christian Church. Needless to say If I am correct, my family, friends and community are damned....I am trying to save as many as possible from what I see as heresy.

2. If your beliefs are not correct what will you lose? Are you diminished by losing? What is the cost, not only to you but to others?

If my beliefs are not correct, and the LDS position is, then I have doomed myself to outer darkness, sinces I have partaken of "sacred covenants." If my beliefs are incorrect and there is no Christ, then we are all doomed to nothingness, then I must try to form morals and ethics that have nothing to do with Christianity, and I will go backward to my beliefs in nothing but hedonism and enjoying each moment without a thought to others or eternity (been there done that, am saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone). Now I live for His glory.

3. If both of your beliefs are incorrect what will it cost you and others? Will you regret the time you have spent arguing?

I do not regret the time I have in discussion with others about any topic. It is the only way to learn. When we shut our brains off to wonderment and examination, we might as well exist....um, well in outer darkness. Just my two cents.

820 posted on 07/12/2007 11:16:59 AM PDT by colorcountry (To pursue union at the expense of truth is treason to the Lord Jesus. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800801-820821-840 ... 1,341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson