Skip to comments.
Columbia Discussion thread
Feb 1, 2003
Posted on 02/01/2003 8:41:00 AM PST by Admin Moderator
Edited on 02/01/2003 9:11:45 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
'On behalf of posters on Free Republic, I post this with deepest sympathy for the crew and their families.
Mission - sts107
This is a continuation of the original thread.
Shuttle Contact LOST-No Tracking Data During RE-Entry!
ANY DU LINKS OR POSTS WILL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. Keep them on the original thread.
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: columbia; columbiatragedy; feb12003; india; israel; nasa; shuttle; spaceshuttle; sts107; unitedstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 1,201-1,213 next last
To: Ichneumon
Imagine how I feel -- I remember the JFK assassination. Yeah, I remember my parents telling me about that :^)
801
posted on
02/01/2003 11:41:04 AM PST
by
general_re
(Just remember - you're only as old as you feel... ;))
Astronaut Mark Kelly picks up a piece of debris from space shuttle Columbia in Nacogdoches, Texas, Saturday, Feb. 1, 2003. Space shuttle Columbia broke apart in flames 200,000 feet over Texas on Saturday, killing all seven astronauts just minutes before they were to glide to a landing in Florida. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip)
To: CFC__VRWC
Understood.
FReegards
To: Admin Moderator
Were does this fit in, historicaly, as to national shocks over the last 62 years?
1) Attack on Pearl Harbor
2) 9/11
3) JFK assasinated
4) Reagan shot
5) Challenger
6) Columbia
Comments anyone?
To: HighWheeler
Still no salient rejoinder...as expected...
To: steveegg
Come on; I'm not old and I remember the Challenger. I was in electronics class in high school when that word came across the PA speakers. Seriously. I was in the eighth grade, for crying out loud - it wasn't that long ago ;)
To: CFC__VRWC; Steel Wolf
..Are there any other shuttles in the pipeline?
CFC: None right now; what we need is a new-design vehicle.
Steel Wolf: Air density at sea level is about 980 millibars - at 20,000 feet about
half that - at 40K it's about 200mb - at 60K about 100mb - at 100K feet it's
maybe 20 millibars = 2% of ground level. At 200K feet there is just not much
air; 207,000 feet is almost 40 miles.
To: Moose4
'During the last 16 minutes before landing the orbiter performs four S-turn maneuvers to slow it down. Each of these turns removes energy from the vehicle very much like that experienced by a giant slalom skier. At this time the flight control systems such as the elevons and the rudder have sufficient air pressure to accomplish the maneuvers and the RCS is turned off.'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If we are playing odds, I would make the guess that the anomalous event that occurred early on in what turned out to be this disasterous mission which did not occur on the other successful missions - [which was the breaking off the piece of insulation or ice that appeared to strike the wing area during the takeoff] - will be determined to be the cause of the failure which occurred on reentry.
808
posted on
02/01/2003 11:43:16 AM PST
by
Route66
(America's Mainstreet)
To: Peach
Brian Williams: It falls again to the President to calm the nation, but thankfully we aren't talking about terrorism. NBC Reporter: A huge disaster in the making and the president will want to address that. The Department of Homeland Security has sent officials to the states where debris is known to have fallen due to the dangerous nature of the debris. The president will reflect the grief that has overcome the country Your point? What part of this is not true?
809
posted on
02/01/2003 11:45:10 AM PST
by
Dave S
To: DoughtyOne
You know, a lot of things are reported after one of these events that are completely bogus. This may have been one of them. I appreciate your comments and agree that it sounds as if the report I heard was suspect. No worries - nobody really knows a damn thing about what went wrong at this point, not even NASA. We're all just whistling in the dark here...
To: MrNatural
At 200K feet there is just not much air; 207,000 feet is almost 40 miles. Even a tiny amount of air would produce a tremendous amount of heat at the speed the shuttle was traveling, right?
To: dep
oms pod. Once more, in English? For us non-rocket scientists ;)
To: Friend of thunder
No offense/offence taken. :) My propensity for typos is well-known on some threads. In fact, they're referred to as Darlin'isms. I did, indeed, mean typical rather than atypical.
813
posted on
02/01/2003 11:47:14 AM PST
by
Darlin'
(May God Bless and comfort the families and friends of all onboard)
To: general_re
Hard to judge scale, but that looks way too small to be one of the main engines - it has to be one of the smaller engines that they use for braking on re-entry... Actually, they use the main engines for orbital braking, I believe.
To me it looks like the nozzles on the OMS (Orbital Maneuvering System), which they use for attitude adjustment while in orbit, which are quite small.
The main nozzle is quite large, not a lot smaller than the main engines, but note the many dinky little nozzles near it (just dots on the large photo, shaded pink in the drawing), they look about the size of the one in the debris photo (which is obviously small, given the size comparison of the pine needles near it).
To: CyberAnt
The focus of terrorism has been that the shuttle was not attacked FROM THE GROUND. That was a no brainer IMO. What I would like to know is if the onboard computer that controlled the shuttle received its information from the ground control.
815
posted on
02/01/2003 11:49:31 AM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: general_re
Once more, in English? For us non-rocket scientists ;) See post #814
To: general_re
True. Take care.
To: general_re
orbital maneuvering system. the smaller (but not tiny) rockets that are used to tune the shuttle's attitude while in orbit. one of the concerns during challenger was oms firing during the last part of the flight, in an apparent effort to correct the uncorrectable pitch caused by the piercing of the external tank.
dep
818
posted on
02/01/2003 11:50:28 AM PST
by
dep
To: All
Something caused the shuttle to go off course. Is it possible that it "bumped" something floating in space??
Just thinking till they tell me what's up!!
To: tscislaw
I too, live near the Space Coast and we saw Columbia launch. Excuse my ignorance, but could the shuttle have been brought down by a device triggered by radio? (defective tiles, planted onboard ahead of time)
How secure is the system at KSC? I wouldn't let anyone with a Middle Eastern sounding name near the place, myself,and I'd tell CAIR to stick it. But, that's just me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 1,201-1,213 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson