Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN's Ritter faced sex rap
New York Daily News ^ | 1/19/03 | Joe Mahoney

Posted on 01/19/2003 1:15:49 AM PST by kattracks

ALBANY - Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter was secretly prosecuted in Albany County in 2001 after he was snared in an Internet sex sting operation, law enforcement sources told the Daily News.

Ritter, who lives in the Albany suburb of Delmar, is now a high-profile critic of President Bush's war preparations.

He was arrested by Colonie Police in June 2001 on a misdemeanor charge after he allegedly had a sexual discussion on the Internet with an undercover investigator he thought was an underage girl, law enforcement sources disclosed on condition of anonymity.

The case was sealed, and Colonie officials declined to release the arrest records, explaining the matter was adjourned in local court in contemplation of dismissal.

The Schenectady Daily Gazette reported yesterday that Albany District Attorney Paul Clyne fired veteran Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser last week for failing to inform him of the case against Ritter.

Clyne said that as a "sensitive" case, it should have been brought to his attention.

Ritter, who has made frequent appearances on network television after speaking to the Iraq National Assembly last year, could not be reached for comment.

Joe Mahoney



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: napalminthemorning; pedophile; scottritter; treason; un; weaponsinspector; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 601-617 next last
To: river rat
Explains why Ritter looked so very pissed in interviews. Scary fellow. And I bet he would not fare well at the next Marine Corps birthday ball.
441 posted on 01/19/2003 12:56:47 PM PST by CARepubGal (Vegetarian meaneth bad hunter (from Ren Faire))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
There's No way that local cops would have snared him, and sealed the records without Federal Authorities (FBI/CIA/etc) knowing about it.

I agree that it's inconceivable that the Bush administration did not know about this information. Ritter is the highest profile public apologist for Saddam Hussein's regime. The turnaround from his previous position is extraordinary, and has been the subject of immense public speculation but, beyond the question of the $400K Ritter received for making the pro-Saddam documentary and the occasional hint of some funny business over his Russian wife, nothing concrete has emerged publicly to explain how he was turned. Now, I don't think the Bush administration is in any hurry to bring the Iraq question to a climax. On the contrary, everything suggests exactly the opposite: they want things to move forward as slowly as possible, so long as the momentum is not lost. The useful idiots of the left -- the Kofi Annans, the Scott Ritters, the Schroeders, the Nicolas Kristofs and Barbara Hatch Rosenbergs, and so on -- are actually being leveraged by the administration to achieve exactly that. Bush has always known how Ritter was turned -- as you rightly observe, the alternative is simply incredible. But perhaps the leak of this information now indicates that this particular useful idiot, at least, has exhausted his usefulness?

442 posted on 01/19/2003 12:59:55 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Any time I see Ritter on a news show (before I turn it) I think of the old question " were you lying then or are you lying now"?

Here's another piece for the conspiracy puzzle. Libs (and or Iraq) found out about the charges against Ritter after it happened or just recently. This release may be a preemptive strike so they can either try to build his public image back up (HA) or distance themselves from him. Either way they didn't want Ritter discredited right at the moment when they'll need him most, during his blizzard of TV appearances when the war kicks off. Time will tell.
443 posted on 01/19/2003 1:02:55 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Yatta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: bvw; esopman
Thanks for the good posts/info on #266 and #336...
444 posted on 01/19/2003 1:10:20 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Again, I would caution against getting too wrapped up in this particular incident. What's important is what it tells us about Scott Ritter. It is highly implausible that Scott Ritter was blackmailed into becoming a high-profile shill for Saddam Hussein using the threat to release this information. Think about it. How would that work, exactly? What's the blackmailer supposed to have threatened, exactly? "Write abook, make a documentary, go on TV every night and get in everybody's face opposing the administration, and we won't tip off the press about your court case?" It doesn't make sense. No, this incident tells us something important about Scott Ritter, something about how he could be bribed or blackmailed, but only in a general way. Get sucked into the minutaie of the court records story and you'll lose sight of the big picture. Someone turned Scott Ritter from being Saddam's biggest accuser to his biggest apologist. Who did it, and what was the lever? I think we are now in a position to make a pretty good guess.
445 posted on 01/19/2003 1:12:03 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
The main interest in this story is that it offers an explanation for Ritter's change in position. The story is the point of the thread. If you think there should be a general Scott Ritter thread, by all means, start one.

And no, it is not unreasonable that the Clintons would lean on Ritter. Hussein could also be the primary suspect.

446 posted on 01/19/2003 1:13:32 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
How would this specific incident be used to blackmail Scott Ritter into publicly reversing his position on Iraq, writing a book, making a documentary, touring college campuses, appearing on TV every night to oppose the Bush administration's policy on Iraq? Think it through. What would be the mechanics of that? Pretend you're the blackmailer. Spell it out. Do a reality check. It doesn't work. Ergo, trying to turn this into a story about Hillary because of some possible butt-covering by a low-level democratic officials is a waste of time. It's more than a waste of time. It's way to turn a useful piece of information into a silly partisan talking point.
447 posted on 01/19/2003 1:23:25 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: angkor
Thanks for the timeline. It appears that he sold his soul or was extorted into changing his position.
448 posted on 01/19/2003 2:01:25 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Free Republic, the site supported by those who don't believe in free lunches! Are you a donor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
No, he wasn't being blackmailed because of this story, but rather, this story simply indicates WHY he was being blackmailed! I AM thinking it through! I have been thinking about this since Ritter very suddenly and publicly turned!

It may be likely that the author of the blackmail is Saddam Hussein, because he has documented evidence of something that would destroy Ritter. I would say underage sex would do a pretty good job of that.

Are you missing the discussion about WHY Ritter was inspecting a CHILDREN'S prison in Iraq? Wouldn't you like to know WHY?

If Ritter has a proclivity for children, several people knew about it, including Saddam Hussein and the Clintons, who he majorly dissed at the Biden hearing.

Now, it is quite possible that the Clintons found out about this and covered up the arrest in their carrot/stick approach. Equally likely that Hussein exerted some influence to do so, although you would have to explain to me who his emissary to the assistant DA was.

449 posted on 01/19/2003 2:34:34 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I've got a friend - a former police officer - who used to do just such work. He would sign in with a name implying he was a young teen girl, and he would get hit after hit - just left and right.

Reminds me of the South Park episode where Cartman decides he's too mature for his friends and goes onto AOL:

I've outgrown all my friends. I need to meet more mature people, Clyde Frog. [looks at Clyde Frog for a few seconds, then] Oh, great idea, Clyde Frog! [walks over to the chair and hops on] I can meet new friends on the Internet! [clicks the mouse and presses a few keys, then the computer chimes. A list of chat rooms comes up] Here's a chat room: "Men Who Like Young Boys" [moves the cursor to the title and clicks on it] That's perfect. [starts typing] Hi everybody! I am a young boy seeking an older male for good times. I am eight years old and would li- [DOZENS of replies start instantly cascading over his message] Wow! Look at all these guys who wanna be my friend! I'll pick? Tony316. [click on Tony's reply and starts typing] Hi Tony. [clicks and reads the reply] "So what are you into?" [replies] Oh, you know, the usual stuff. Smiley-face. [clicks and reads the reply] "Kewl. Wanna get together? [softer] Smiley-face?" [replies] Sure, Tony! That would be? kewl. Winking, smiley, face. [clicks and reads the reply] "Meet me at Mel's Buffet restaurant tomorrow morning." [replies] Sounds good. See you then! Clown hat, curly hair, smiley-face. [clicks, then brightly] You see that, Clyde Frog? Tomorrow I'm gaonna meet my first mature friend!

450 posted on 01/19/2003 2:36:19 PM PST by Timesink (Poodle: The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Anyone think he will appear on O'Reilly after this?

Don't know about O'Reilly, but would love to see Greta Van Susteran get ahold of him again.

451 posted on 01/19/2003 2:42:03 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
No, he wasn't being blackmailed because of this story, but rather, this story simply indicates WHY he was being blackmailed! I AM thinking it through! I have been thinking about this since Ritter very suddenly and publicly turned!... Now, it is quite possible that the Clintons found out about this and covered up the arrest in their carrot/stick approach. Equally likely that Hussein exerted some influence to do so, although you would have to explain to me who his emissary to the assistant DA was.

You agree that this particular incident is not the basis for the blackmail, but then, after bizarrely and out-of-the-blue setting up an equivalence between Clinton and Hussein as likely blackmailers, you cite specifics of this particular incident to downplay the Hussein possibility. This is, to put it mildly, intellectually perverse. This is a story about Hussein, not Clinton. Clinton has nothing to do with it.

452 posted on 01/19/2003 3:04:33 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
How do you know Clinton has nothing to do with it? The ADA was promised something for the risk she took.

You are deliberately misconstruing what I have said. Of course Hussein has something to do with it. That is a given. But I would not be surprised to see Clinton involved as well.

Well, I don't agree with all of your theories, and you are free to disagree with mine. Time will tell who is right. I do think it odd that you are determined to disassociate Mrs. Clinton from this fiasco, given that the ADA is a democrat in the state capital, and a woman, and no doubt a supporter of Mrs. Clinton, who she would no doubt love to do a favor for.

IF Hussein is behind this deal, HOW DID HE GET TO THE ADA?

453 posted on 01/19/2003 3:10:15 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
what a fool...
454 posted on 01/19/2003 3:12:32 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
IF Hussein is behind this deal, HOW DID HE GET TO THE ADA?

You already agreed with me that this incident was not the basis for "turning" Ritter, therefore that question is irrelevant, a sideshow, a distraction, and a blind alley.

455 posted on 01/19/2003 3:15:13 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Now the whole world knows what had him angry at America...... "Allegedly" (official disclaimer) He was caught. He's nothing but a criminal POS . Above and beyond aiding an abetting terrorist nations via disinformational lies and deception.

Just one more turd in the punch bowl IMO !

456 posted on 01/19/2003 3:30:29 PM PST by Squantos (Stay Safe Ya'll !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
No, it is not a blind alley. Someone did not want Ritter's name in the papers with this charge. The likeliest suspects for that are the ones whom he is serving. It is quite possible that those who blackmailed him are also the ones who had this evidence covered up, because once the info is public, they have a reduced hold upon him.

I am trying really hard not to get aggravated with you about this, but you are consistantly refusing to see the point.

On the other hand, you expect everyone to understand YOUR cryptic comments about your theory about anthrax. Pfui.

457 posted on 01/19/2003 3:55:35 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell
Maybe the "72 virgins in heaven" ploy got his attention!
458 posted on 01/19/2003 3:57:56 PM PST by AuntB (Support our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist; esopman
Zviad goes back to Zviad Gamzakhurdia of Georgia, whose forces attacked Sheverdnadze's in the early 1990's and refused to be a party to any agreement constituting the CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) out of the former USSR.

You got it backward. It was Shevardnadze who attacked the legitimately-elected government of the anti-communist president Zviad Gamsakhurdia. Shevardnadze, known as "Bloody Eduard" for his time as head of the KGB in Georgia during the USSR, overthrew Gamsakhurdia's legitimate government and installed a dictatorship. To this day, there are hundreds of political prisoners in Georgia, whose only crime is to oppose the Shevardnadze dictatorship.

459 posted on 01/19/2003 4:45:47 PM PST by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I see the smear bund is out in force. Of course you are not allowed to be critical of Bush's foreign policy without being framed for crimes. We are approaching authoritarianism. Rapidly. And many here welcome it. You will deserve what eventually befalls you. Enjoy your happy days in hell...
460 posted on 01/19/2003 4:48:15 PM PST by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 601-617 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson