To: All
2 posted on
01/17/2003 2:17:18 AM PST by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: JohnHuang2
Nice article. I shoudl read the book.
4 posted on
01/17/2003 2:28:52 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Whacked: The environmental movement in one word.)
To: The Raven
Good to see this man's work & position getting more and more notice.
6 posted on
01/17/2003 3:46:21 AM PST by
Molly Pitcher
(Demolish the Criminal Party!! NOW!!)
To: JohnHuang2
environmentalism is a political ideology based on science
More accurately, "Environmentalism is a political ideology that inaccurately claims legitimacy by appealing to science."
8 posted on
01/17/2003 5:08:49 AM PST by
aruanan
To: JohnHuang2
Thanks fdor this article. I sent it to the editor of my local paper who regularly trashes the enviro drivel. I hope it will be grist for his mill.
9 posted on
01/17/2003 5:20:00 AM PST by
bert
To: JohnHuang2
"As Ronald Bailey pointed out in 2002's Global Warming and other Eco-Myths, environmentalism is a political ideology based on science -- the accepted way we judge what is the objective truth." Bailey is wrong here. "Environmentalism" is a political ideology MASQUERADING as science. It uses "scientific-sounding language" not based in real facts to mislead the non-scientific public.
To: JohnHuang2
They are absolutely right about "scifi" american. What was once a great science magazine was transformed over the course of a few months into a pile of drivel focused on promoting environmentalism, bashing conservatives, and denigrating religion.
These folks seem to be purposefully infiltrating science publications. I noticed that Astronomy just hired THREE english majors onto the staff, one to be editor-in-chief! Seems awfully dubious to me, considering the abysmal level of mathematical and scientific curiosity most, though not all, english majors display.
To: JohnHuang2
As a former liberal environmentalist until getting involved in asbestos abatement, I read Lomborg's book from cover to cover. I had also read Julian Simon's book which inspired Lomborg. All this publicity will only cause more people to read Skeptical Environmentalist.
Bjorn, if you see this...keep up the good work...
At a professional course for asbestos abatement, a comment by one of the instructors at coffee break started me to search for other "junkscience". He said that we were spending billions to protect smokers from asbestos, arguing that the cilia in broncial tubes kept out most fibers, while a cigarette stopped the cilia protective particle expelling movements for hours.
The same thing happened with radon... Most data was based on uranium miners most of whom smoked... Dr. Bernard Cohen of Univ of Pittsburgh did a large study that found that the counties in U.S. with highest radon levels had the lowest lung canger rate. But as an architect I still have to have radon tests for new federal work.
13 posted on
01/17/2003 6:47:26 AM PST by
bobg
(Bob G.)
To: JohnHuang2
read later
To: backhoe; madfly; Stand Watch Listen; brityank; OldFriend; Grampa Dave; editor-surveyor; ...
bump
15 posted on
01/18/2003 5:43:33 PM PST by
Tailgunner Joe
(God Armeth The Patriot)
22 posted on
03/16/2007 11:14:43 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Sunday, March 11, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson