Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smallpox Comitatus
self ^ | 12/18/02 | Self

Posted on 12/17/2002 11:13:33 PM PST by Joe 6-pack

Title 18 USC., Part I, Chap. 67 Sec. 1385. - Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus

"Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

Circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution....

Article I.

Section 8. The Congress shall have power to...

...provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;

...define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

... declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;

... make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;

... make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

Section 9.

...The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

Article II

Section 2. The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States..."

So much has been made in recent days about how badly the Constitution will be scarred by the use of U.S. Military on U.S. soil in the event of terrorist acts following up to the September 11, 2001 attacks. Many of these issues are raised by so-called libertarians who profess to be Constitutional purists, who lose sight of the fact that at the time of the drafting of our Constitution, and for some period thereafter, the VAST MAJORITY of U.S. military activity took place on U.S. soil. Moreover, many of these same persons heretofore railed against the projection of U.S. military force abroad, cautioning against, "foreign entanglements."

The facts of the matter are thus...

We have been attacked...in a manner more viscious than Pearl Harbor, the incursions of Pancho Villa, the sinking of the Lusiitania, or any other assault against our nation suffered during the 20th Century.

Efforts to continue attacks against our nation continue.

Liberal immigration policies have permitted the enemy to grow within.

Posse Comitatus is NOT an integral part of the Constitution; rather a proscription against the use of the Federal military in a law enforcement capacity against U.S. Civilians, UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES. Exceptions have been written into the law, and, believe it or not, U.S. Military frequently supports U.S. Law enforcement in the following capacities...

1. Virtually not a day goes by where U.S. Army bomb detector K9s support the U.S. Secret Service, State deprtment, or DoD who request K9 sweeps in anticipation of dignitary visits.

2. U.S. Army / AF EOD personnel support local law enforcement who encounter unexploded U.S. or foreign, "souvenier," munitions or other IEDs which exceed the technical capacity of local EOD personnel.

When the enemy is within, are we to believe that the Department of Defense no longer has a role because the opponent is on U.S. soil? This is perhaps one the most absurd notions that political commentators of any stripe have ever proffered. Most curiously, the concept is most fiercely advocated by those who've tried to minimize the DoD's role abroad, suggesting that forward projection is not a matter of defense. We are a nation at war, and the warfighting component of the government should be given the lead.

Persons arguing aginst the DoD's role in the current conflict on Constitutional grounds need to realize that the DoD, formerly, the War Department, is Constitutionally organized and has a Constitutional role...on U.S. soil and beyond.

While I don't pretend to know more than anyone else on the subject, I can confidently assert that I know more than most. I served as an active duty military police officer in the U.S. Army for ten years. In my last two years, I served on a Defense Coordinating Element (DCE) responsible for organizing DoD support for FEMA ops in the event of natural or man-made disasters. I resigned effectively, in December 2000, prior to 9/11. Up to that time, to my awareness, FEMA officials, and military supervisors were painfully cognizant of the implications of Posse Comitatus and virtually all contingency planning was conducted with such considerations...even in cases where, in my opinion, justifications for exceptions were valid.

I've been deployed to quite a few of the world's finest sh!t-holes and have been inoculated against everything from Bubonic Plague, to Japanese Encephilitas to Yellow Fever. I've never developed any symptoms greater than an itchy arm. My immunization record is far longer and more replete than my resume will ever be, and I've yet to suffer ill-effects. Should a small-pox vaccine come available tomorrow, I'd accept it, not because it was mandated, but simply, because I really don't want to contract small-pox!


TOPICS: Editorial; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: possecomitatus; smallpox; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-175 next last
To: Sabertooth; Admin Moderator
You need to settle down.
101 posted on 12/22/2002 8:17:21 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
You know, if I didn't know better, I'd swear you were The Freeper Formerly Known As FormerLurker.
102 posted on 12/22/2002 8:18:16 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Too calm, has made half a dozen posts and hasn't called anyone a shill or a liar and hasn't done a massive copy and paste. If it's FL he's putting a lot of effort into fighting his instincts.
103 posted on 12/22/2002 8:20:18 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
Sabertooth, are you always so nasty with people whom you don't agree with?

Not usually.

However, lying trolls like FormerLurker, who are a menace to public health and a threat to the credibility of Free Republic, warrant special treatment. He'd been caught spreading his wack-job theories many times before, and had been given opportunities to address the problems with his tinfoil. His response was more spam.

Good riddance, it was time to bury him and the crap he dragged in with him.




104 posted on 12/22/2002 8:21:44 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
FL pinged the mod *twice*. Then he whined to me, even though I had made it quite clear, in the post to which he replied, that I had just finished consuming six adult beverages.

He's lucky I was still in Mellow Mode at the time, or I might have gotten mean...

105 posted on 12/22/2002 8:27:57 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I didn't know that. I guess if they came in 3 days after it started, that explains why so much carnage was able to occur. I'll never forget what happened to that poor Reginald Denny. And the media portrayed his attackers as victims of the system. Do you remember how many people died? I know some did, but the press didn't say much about those numbers.
106 posted on 12/22/2002 8:27:59 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
He does seem to have picked up the baton, doesn't he?
107 posted on 12/22/2002 8:30:15 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Well, it looks like Former Lurker is now Former Poster.

Even if he does sign up under a different name, his style will be easy to spot. Anti-fluoridation, anti-vaccination, General Jack D. Ripper and his grain alcohol and rain water and precious bodily fluids.

And, yes, the endless links to quackery.

108 posted on 12/22/2002 8:31:15 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: woofie; Admin Moderator; All
If Former Lurker was banned, then that is a terrible shame. People will have differing opinions and should be allowed to express them. And FL is/was no dummy. If the banning of FL is true, then it's a sad day for FR. I guess if I don't want to be banned I better tow the line and agree with everything and everyone, gee, just like the old Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, they didn't like differences of opinion either.
109 posted on 12/22/2002 8:32:47 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
No, it's more like "if you disagree, post real facts to support your argument instead of engaging in invective."
110 posted on 12/22/2002 8:34:11 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Too many are biting the dust lately. Don't like it.
111 posted on 12/22/2002 8:34:37 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
Oh please, all FL did was spam threads with the same psuedo-scientific BS over and over. Then he insulted people and went whining to the moderators when he got a taste of his own medicine. At best he was a nut job, at worst a liar. The only bad part about his banning is that it wasn't a total purge, they should have deleted every word he ever wrote on FR. All you've got to do to not get banned is to not be a lieing weasel who blatantly violates every written rule of the site.
112 posted on 12/22/2002 8:36:33 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I can't define many. I don't know any exact numbers. And right now I don't care as I am feeling very bum over FL being banned. :(
113 posted on 12/22/2002 8:38:19 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
Let me tell you something about Former Lurker. It's not his wacky opinions that got him banned, it was his tactics. FL had a habit of posting avalanches links to quack science, and he took any criticism of his so-called "evidence" very personally. He called people liars and un-patriotic, he would start FReepmailing his critics, and then would ping the Admin Moderators when his very thin skin was penetrated.

His anti-vaccination/anti-fluoridation was like a religion with him; if you disagreed, there was something wrong with you. He was one of the most intolerant of any FReeper. He was the old Soviet Union or Nazi Germany in the way he couldn't stand any disagreement.

114 posted on 12/22/2002 8:39:42 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
I can't define many. I don't know any exact numbers.

Then you can't say what you said with any real assurance of it being accurate, right?

And right now I don't care as I am feeling very bum over FL being banned. :(

Only because you agreed with him.

If you had ever disagreed with him, you'd be saying "and the a$$hole deserved it."

115 posted on 12/22/2002 8:40:32 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
If FR keeps banning people who have strong feelings on issues, or maybe the "wrong" feelings on issues, it's going to be a very boring place. People don't have to agree with everything they hear, but I think banning is going too far.
116 posted on 12/22/2002 8:43:46 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
Again, it wasn't FL's opinions, it was how he dealt with other members that got him banned. He was the intolerant one. I remember on one thread he complained about other people "disrupting", when in fact they were posting disagreements with his point of view. So I posted to him: "disruption=dissent with your views" and the next thing you know, I got a FReepmail from Jim Robinson asking me to explain myself. What do you think of Former Lurker having an itchy trigger finger where the abuse button is concerned?
117 posted on 12/22/2002 8:47:32 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Perhaps I'll soon be in the same camp as the former FReeper known as Former Lurker. Damn. But no, it's just me. I am not nearly as resourceful as FL. And there really are some not so comforting statistics concerning smallpox.

I just wish people would keep an open mind and look at both sides. Wasn't Former Lurker on FR for a long time? This is really bad, and now all these others are glorifying in the banning of FL. It reminds me of a bunch of hungry dogs zeroing in for the kill.

118 posted on 12/22/2002 8:53:26 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
People around here are turning into real spoil-sports.
119 posted on 12/22/2002 8:55:51 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: woofie
"Anyone is free to disregard sound medical advice but they should not attempt to convince others, when the consequences can be so severe."

There is a fine line between "public nuisance" and "public health risk".

Former Lurker obliterated it.

120 posted on 12/22/2002 8:58:38 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson