To: DBtoo
Again, it wasn't FL's opinions, it was how he dealt with other members that got him banned. He was the intolerant one. I remember on one thread he complained about other people "disrupting", when in fact they were posting disagreements with his point of view. So I posted to him: "disruption=dissent with your views" and the next thing you know, I got a FReepmail from Jim Robinson asking me to explain myself. What do you think of Former Lurker having an itchy trigger finger where the abuse button is concerned?
To: wimpycat; Poohbah
But why is it some people like FL get banned, but others who are really vicious towards other posters, even threatening them, are tolerated? There are a couple of people like that on FR. I've stayed away from the threads those people like to visit as they are too unpleasant. I've always wondered why they don't get banned. They call people terrible names for not agreeing with them, and as I said they threaten too.
136 posted on
12/22/2002 9:50:06 PM PST by
DBtoo
To: wimpycat
I think I am going to write Jim Robinson and ask why certain dangerous sounding characters are allowed to stay on.
142 posted on
12/22/2002 10:06:27 PM PST by
DBtoo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson