Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DOWNING OF TWA FLIGHT 800: 'Hey, look at the fireworks'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, July 17, 2002 | By Jack Cashill and James Sanders

Posted on 07/17/2002 1:58:36 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: afz400
Gotta love that memory hole. Or is that badspeak?
41 posted on 07/17/2002 7:22:47 AM PDT by Tourist Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
I think OBL and co. did it with (a) stinger(s). Clintoon knew it - and had info soon afterwards but decided it would be better to bargain than fight (or tell the truth). He told OBL that he would bend over for the Pali's and Arafat - Man of Peace (tm) and put the screws to Israel - even to the point of putting Carville on the job of getting a shill (Barak) in place for the cake frosting. In exchange, no more planes fall. But dealing with scorpions can get you stung and slicky got out-slicked at camp david by the senile Arafat, leaving no treaty no legacy. OBL (with big help from saudi $$$ and iraqi evildoers) plots next phase of war on infidels, leading us to Sept 11th. (Do I get a young jedi for this speculation?)
42 posted on 07/17/2002 7:28:22 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
JAMES KAELSTROM....

Kaelstrom comes across as sincere ... delusional, but sincere.

43 posted on 07/17/2002 7:37:39 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
All that any President has to do to perform a perfect cover-up, is to claim National Security and everything closes down, never to be seen again, such as the original FAA radar.

The fact that Kallstrom lies persist to this day should tell everyone all that we need to know about the leaders at the top of the FBI.

44 posted on 07/17/2002 8:05:11 AM PDT by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
bump
45 posted on 07/17/2002 8:07:43 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I understand that there are a lot of holes in my theory, but let's face it -- the "official" explanation is such bullsh!t, and there are a lot of holes in any theory. A couple of things to consider:

1. Even if an order had been given to shoot down the plane, it would have taken far too long for even an F-15 or F-16 to arrive on the scene. As we learned on 9/11, it's not as if there are a bunch of these aircraft sitting on tarmacs with pilots in them just waiting for an order to take off.

2. The U.S. Navy was apparently conducting some kind of exercise off the coast of New Jersey that evening, which put them in a fairly good position to respond to an emergency of this kind.

3. There are a variety of different eyewitness accounts regarding the "missiles," but from what I understand, all of them can be clearly assigned to one of two different missile trajectories. This is what led to some speculation that the incident was actually the result of a military test gone awry (i.e., the Navy was testing a missile by firing at another missile or a drone of some kind, and the interceptor took down Flight 800 by mistake).

4. While covering up such an incident would be difficult, it certainly would not be impossible. I understand that the crews of the Navy recovery teams at the site were subject to some kind of unusual executive order, and there is clear evidence to suggest that the U.S. military has attempted to cover incidents up before (remember that explosion in the gun turret of the U.S.S. Iowa, in which the Navy tried to pin the blame on a "gay" sailor?)

46 posted on 07/17/2002 8:20:42 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
You don't call upon the Navy to shoot down hijacked airplanes.

Why not? I'm not just talking about a hijacked airplane, but a hijacked airplane that was about to be flown into a building in New York City.

47 posted on 07/17/2002 8:22:40 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Stephie (George Stephanopoulis on National TV) said that they (Clinton Admin) could be in direct contact with the President on Air Force One at all times and mentioned communications during the bombing in OK City and the BOMBING of TWA Flight 800.

I will never forget this moment. I will never forget Stephanopoulis saying this...where he sat...the moment in detail. I was shocked and then felt a certain 'gut knowingness' that the truth of the TWA 800 tragedy has just been announced accidentally. I still firmly believe that plane was shot down.

I will never trust any investigation performed by our government until the truth of this plane accident is released. Common sense, the tremendous amount of witnesses who SAW something streaking UPWARD-hundreds and hundreds-were NOT ALLOW TO TESTIFY at the governmental hearing. This reeks so badly-it makes your heart hurt.

48 posted on 07/17/2002 8:31:00 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Big Bold Bump To The Top!
49 posted on 07/17/2002 8:31:30 AM PDT by elcaudillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
BUMP for later comments...
50 posted on 07/17/2002 8:35:19 AM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard; Cachelot; ravingnutter; wtc911; JohnHuang2
Someone noted somewhere that there are three elements of the new terrorist paradigm that make it different and infinitely more frightening and dangerous than terrorism as we knew it before:

1. The actors are willing to die themselves. There are great numbers of the willing. This fact means that no escape plan is necessary, no attempts at detection avoidance, etc., greatly simplifying the act.

2. The actors don't have the need to claim credit. That isn't part of their strategy or tactics. It's not necessary to their ends.

Does anyone remember seeing this article? It was posted on FR two or three months ago. I don't remember what number 3 is.

51 posted on 07/17/2002 8:39:50 AM PDT by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
As I was watching the news coverage on the night of 9/11, it suddenly dawned on me that Flight 800 was shot down by the U.S. Navy in response to to a very credible threat that it had been hijacked and would be flown into the World Trade Center

That's very interesting. Have you ever heard anything about that, any speculation that this might be the case? I haven't, but it is a theory that would fit the facts as we know them.

52 posted on 07/17/2002 8:42:33 AM PDT by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gg188
Does anyone remember seeing this article?

Vaguely. But the third element is that traditional terrorism is a political tool. The Bader Meinhof group and related "movements" wanted to effect changes and make a political statement. These critters just want to kill everyone not like themselves.

53 posted on 07/17/2002 8:47:32 AM PDT by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hmmm...seems the FBI's "Carnivore" program is slow today...

_Jim and good ol' Elmer haven't shown up to spam and poo-poo the thread in the first 50 posts or so...

54 posted on 07/17/2002 8:55:32 AM PDT by Itzlzha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gg188
The actors are willing to die themselves. There are great numbers of the willing.

This was one of the reasons why it was probably deemed necessary to drop atomic bombs on Japan to end World War II. Even the most fanatical zealots can be snapped back to reality if "their people" are exposed to a hideous, ghoulish form of punishment that was beyond their imagination.

55 posted on 07/17/2002 9:02:43 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Why not? I'm not just talking about a hijacked airplane, but a hijacked airplane that was about to be flown into a building in New York City.

See also #40.

The Navy moves at 25 kts. The Air Force moves at 500 kts+. We don't have either a Naval base or and Air Force base around here, so whom do you think would be most likely to get here the soonest? Was the Navy called on 9/11? The Air Force was.

ML/NJ

56 posted on 07/17/2002 9:04:52 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gg188
I never heard any speculation that this might be the case, but while I was watching the coverage of 9/11 (particularly the uncertainty about whether the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania had actually been shot down) it suddenly dawned on me that this was a very plausible scenario that would explain some of the loose ends.
57 posted on 07/17/2002 9:04:53 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
See Item #2 in Post #46. One of the things that prompted me to come up with this scenario is that the U.S. Navy (from what I understand) was already "on the scene."
58 posted on 07/17/2002 9:07:56 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Revolutionary
Clinton covered up this terrorist attack because it might have thrown the '96 campaign into chaos.

Par for the course for the cowardly sociopath.

The small plane might have chickened out at the last moment or just missed. It is hard to hit another plane when you have a significant speed and climb rate disadvantage.

Simultaneous attacks, rocket and small aircraft, cobbled together. Sure sounds like an al-queda operation to me.

59 posted on 07/17/2002 9:22:03 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer; Alamo-Girl
What i would like to know is who was on that flight ,like people who at the last minute did not get on the flight that killed ron brown,and then died on flight 800,coincedence right?

Yes. There was a man by the name of Samir Ferrat who was supposed to be on Ron Brown's plane and missed it. He also took out a large insurance policy shortly after Mr. Browns plane went down.

Another clinton enemy on board was Hank Gray.

Look about 1/3rd of the way down the attached link for a bolded area. It describes both of them.

More info here from the incomparable Alamo-girl's site:
DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON
SECTION: REMEMBERING THE DEAD
SUBSECTION: TWA800 –– RESEARCH PROJECT
Revised 10/12/00

While the link is long it covers the military presence in the area, types of missiles, witnesses, targets on board and tons of other info.

God Save America (Please)

60 posted on 07/17/2002 9:32:43 AM PDT by John O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson