They live off Whitey’s earnings, yet hate Whitey.
Next they’ll be saying wypipo have no souls…
San Ramon.
Super white, super rich, super stupid rich liberals.
Ja, ve have a culture!
IOW, white people are subhuman and killing them is OK.
As culture is formed from ways of living among a group, and as ways of living are inherited, created and borrowed, any such statement is profoundly absurd.
I have heard that any number of times. It gets really nasty if they know you are from the Midwest. We are apparently the lowest of the low.
Nobody wishes polio or smallpox on this fetid herd of ingrates.
And why do they insist on taking white names? Cultural appropriation much?
Yeah? Well then let’s talk about African American’s culture of theft, robbery, rape and murder which seems to be everywhere when blacks live mostly among other blacks.
Wanna guess the “culture” of the “eddikator” that taught that drivel?
We ARE American culture in the Midwest, up until 20 years ago. Still a melting pot
American culture is NOT Hollywood.
Well, she’s sort of correct. White people don’t have any culture at all and any white person celebrating their cultural heritage is extremely racist. Diversity is the new religion which means whites must give up their culture and embrace every weird foriegn idea no matter how savage. Whites are not ALLOWED to have a culture.
Who invented basketball?
DEI devolves into simple racist silliness. Anyone who thinks white people have no culture gets cut off from pizza for life. That’ll larn ‘em.
Isn’t ketchup tied with ranch dressing for the number one spot? It is in my home. :)
From whom did white people steal the waltz, Impressionism and electricity?
There was a story a few years back that salsa had become America's favorite condiment. I don't know what happened to that. More recent stories have ketchup and mayo battling it out.
The chicken tikka masala story, obviously false in the case of the US, may have come from Britain -- so much stuff on the internet does and people don't bother to check. Even in the case of Britain, fish and chips is probably still more popular.
Just for fun, somebody's idea of what the most popular condiment in each state. Peanut butter and Marshmallow Fluff are condiments? And Nutella is a popular condiment?
The statement "white people had no culture and any culture that they did have was stolen" contains several logical and conceptual issues, including fallacies, contradictions, and unsupported claims. Here is an analysis of some of the problems in the statement:
Fallacies:
Hasty Generalization: The statement makes a sweeping generalization about all white people, implying that they had no culture and that any culture they had was stolen. This is a hasty generalization because it makes an unjustified assumption about an entire racial or ethnic group based on insufficient evidence.
Stolen Concepts:
Cultural Appropriation: The statement assumes that any culture attributed to white people was stolen. This presupposes that cultural appropriation is a universal and inherent characteristic of white culture, which is a loaded and contentious assumption.
Floating Abstractions:
"Stolen Culture": The concept of "stolen culture" is vague and lacks clear definitions or criteria. It floats as an abstract notion without specific examples or evidence to support it.
Invalid Concepts:
"No Culture": The assertion that white people had "no culture" is an invalid concept. All human societies have cultures, which encompass a wide range of traditions, beliefs, practices, and expressions. The statement ignores the diversity of cultures within white communities.
Mystical Concepts:
Implicit Causation: The statement implies a causal relationship between the absence of white culture and the assertion that any culture they had was stolen. This causation is not explained or substantiated, making it a mystical concept.
Pseudo-Concepts:
"Any Culture They Did Have Was Stolen": This statement uses the pseudo-concept of "stolen culture" without providing concrete examples or evidence of such theft. It oversimplifies complex historical interactions and cultural exchanges.
Contradictions:
"No Culture" vs. "Stolen Culture": The statement contradicts itself by asserting that white people had "no culture" while simultaneously claiming that any culture they had was "stolen." If they had no culture, there would be nothing to steal.
Errors:
Historical Accuracy: The statement makes historical claims about the absence of white culture and the theft of any culture they had. These claims are not supported by historical evidence, as various white ethnic and cultural groups have distinct traditions and histories.
False Premises:
Collective Guilt: The statement assumes collective guilt by attributing cultural theft to all white people, which is a false premise. Collective guilt is an unfair and invalid concept.
Open racism against white people...again.
“Faded Mosaic: The Emergence of Post-Cultural America” has an interesting take on this topic, but the author also thinks that skin color isn’t enough to give you a distinct and different culture in today’s America.