Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fiji Hill
white people had no culture and any culture that they did have was stolen

The statement "white people had no culture and any culture that they did have was stolen" contains several logical and conceptual issues, including fallacies, contradictions, and unsupported claims. Here is an analysis of some of the problems in the statement:

Fallacies:

Hasty Generalization: The statement makes a sweeping generalization about all white people, implying that they had no culture and that any culture they had was stolen. This is a hasty generalization because it makes an unjustified assumption about an entire racial or ethnic group based on insufficient evidence.

Stolen Concepts:

Cultural Appropriation: The statement assumes that any culture attributed to white people was stolen. This presupposes that cultural appropriation is a universal and inherent characteristic of white culture, which is a loaded and contentious assumption.

Floating Abstractions:

"Stolen Culture": The concept of "stolen culture" is vague and lacks clear definitions or criteria. It floats as an abstract notion without specific examples or evidence to support it.

Invalid Concepts:

"No Culture": The assertion that white people had "no culture" is an invalid concept. All human societies have cultures, which encompass a wide range of traditions, beliefs, practices, and expressions. The statement ignores the diversity of cultures within white communities.

Mystical Concepts:

Implicit Causation: The statement implies a causal relationship between the absence of white culture and the assertion that any culture they had was stolen. This causation is not explained or substantiated, making it a mystical concept.

Pseudo-Concepts:

"Any Culture They Did Have Was Stolen": This statement uses the pseudo-concept of "stolen culture" without providing concrete examples or evidence of such theft. It oversimplifies complex historical interactions and cultural exchanges.

Contradictions:

"No Culture" vs. "Stolen Culture": The statement contradicts itself by asserting that white people had "no culture" while simultaneously claiming that any culture they had was "stolen." If they had no culture, there would be nothing to steal.

Errors:

Historical Accuracy: The statement makes historical claims about the absence of white culture and the theft of any culture they had. These claims are not supported by historical evidence, as various white ethnic and cultural groups have distinct traditions and histories.

False Premises:

Collective Guilt: The statement assumes collective guilt by attributing cultural theft to all white people, which is a false premise. Collective guilt is an unfair and invalid concept.

26 posted on 09/24/2023 1:24:17 PM PDT by mjp (pro-freedom & pro-wealth $)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mjp

It would be interesting to know the educational background and how much this teacher was paid for their 40 weeks a year.


69 posted on 09/24/2023 3:08:16 PM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: mjp

I want the name of the “equity” teacher.


71 posted on 09/24/2023 3:12:02 PM PDT by sauropod (I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson