Posted on 12/03/2022 4:59:47 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Edited on 12/03/2022 7:07:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
Former President Donald Trump suggested the “termination” of the United States Constitution could be allowable in response to the bombshell report that the Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election.
The former president made his observation via his Truth Social account on Saturday following journalist Matt Taibbi’s thorough report on Twitter’s internal communications during the 2020 elections at the behest of newly-minted CEO Elon Musk.
The author of the Breitbart article above is spinning (lying). Here's what Trump actually posted.
See posts #58 and 59 below.
I read that, and I positively get what he said, and it WASN’T to overthrow the Constitution. He’s saying it’s what the LEFT wants to do. Read it again, this time WITH the punctuation.
‘Face
;o]
(Let me know if you want on or off the Wordle Daily Ping list.)
Twitter's deliberate censorship of the Hunter Biden story, in collusion with Biden not just campaign officials, but government officials leftover from the Obama-Biden Administration, not just flaunted Sec230, but it ran directly afoul of the legal prohibitions against state actors using (ordering!) a public company (one that also falls under government regulations, and thus has something to lose from failure to cooperate with state actors), to deprive not just an individual (me, my posts were censored and my Twitter access suspended as a result of the Hunter Biden story), not just another public company (the NY Post), but the sitting President of the United States, from their respective Constitutional rights, including the First Amendment.
Jack and his entire executive suite should be post-facto charged with criminal corporate malfeasance, having made a direct, in-kind contribution to Biden, by committing prior restraint of the press's and the President's access to his social media company.
Go sit at the kid's table. The adults are talking here.
Are you going to defend Trump’s $500 billion “Platinum Plan” or are reparations for blacks only bad when Democrats talk about doing them?
Or are you going to memory-hole it? I’ll bet you’re going to memory-hole the subject, aren’t you?
So it is alright for our friends to trample the Constitution because it has already been sore abused by our foes. What does that accomplish in the long run except the elevation of tyrants we agree with.
Art 2. Section 1.
* Breitbart USED the words...
“.. to throw the Constitution out.”
* Breitbart FRAMED that question.
* Breitbart ATTRIBUTED those words to POTUS 45.
* Why?
~~~
POTUS 45 asked two simple questions from our American history, on the Constitution and the background of both.
What REPAIR is due to the American people who are the victims of a shredded US Constitution?
~~~~
The correct response is to ANSWER the question.
Who did Americans elect as their president and COMMANDER IN CHIEF, really?
Anyone care, really?
How can we tell who cares, really?
ANSWER YOUR OATH.
ANSWER OUR PLEDGE.
So it is alright for our friends to trample the Constitution because it has already been sore abused by our foes.
What friends of yours are you referring to?
I disagree with your understanding of what Trump wrote. In my opinion he is stating that because the Founders did not want and would not condone false and fraudulent elections the termination of rules, regulations, and articles is allowable.
This is made clearer when he writes“ UNPRECEDENTED FRAUD REQUIRES UNPRECEDENTED CURE!“ Obviously the Founders would not have included a cure for fraud which they did not envision being a possibility.
The President is not the Commander in Chief of the United States.
He is hired as commander in chief of the Army and the Navy.
Those who believe in a Constitutional Republic and the fight against the ideals which once governed this country from being destroyed by enemies foreign and domestic. Classic Liberalism and all that. Oh and God.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. You can believe in the Constitution all you like, but the fact remains your globalist bosses, your corrupt lying representatives don’t give 2 s**ts about you or the Constitution. And they demonstrate this daily. No?
After reading what President Trump said, it seems apparent (to me) that he stated that a fraud of this magnitude can allow for the termination of up to and including the U.S. Constitution, not that he would do that or that he supports that.
But there is no mechanism to throw out the 2020 election or hold a new election for 2020. It’s not possible to do.
President Trump continuing to bring that up demonstrates an ignorance of the US Constitution.
I won’t disagree on that point. They sure have shown their contempt for us. We are expendable.
I understand your point about rules, regulations, admendments that have been distorted or ignored. You should have spelled them out with historical references by the FF in their debates. Throwing out generalities is not doing you nor us any favors.
Try telling a Black person they can’t shop in your store.
Try telling a homosexual you won’t bake them a cake for a
wedding.
Now, explain to me why those two things not run by the
government are impossible to do.
The first amendment is a civil right every bit as much
as a Black person having access.
Anyone participating on a comments web sight, has a
right to participate.
To not allow it, is denying their first amendment rights.
The majority has civil rights too.
Thanks.
Is this much different than Lincoln declaring that the Constituion isn’t a suicide pact?
A more appropriate analogy would be someone could take your signs down if you put them up in their yard.
Not what he said. It’s clear that the current regime regards the termination of regulations, articles et al including the Constitution because they pulled off the steal; plainly evident in their actions. It is illogical that the remedy to the termination of the Constitution by the Uniparty is the termination of the Constitution; simply does not make sense in any context. Please read it again.
Not really, because their yard is not a domain set up
specifically for everyone to place yard signs there.
Twitter is a domain set up for the public to express
their opinions.
Try telling Blacks, Hispanics, or homosexuals they can’t
make purchases at a super-market, and see how long
that lasts.
The majority have civil rights too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.