Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KBJ's case for 'progressive originalism' in Supreme Court debut draws rebuke
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | 10/6/2022 | Kaelan Deese

Posted on 10/06/2022 8:22:23 PM PDT by bitt

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argues the framers of the 14th Amendment adopted it "in a race-conscious way," a position some legal experts say is subject to debate.

Jackson, the first black woman on the Supreme Court, began her first two days on the nine-member bench by speaking more than any other justices , in addition to a full four-minute statement in which she said the 14th Amendment used "race-conscious" remedies to make freedmen equal to white citizens. The issue at hand involved a challenge to Alabama 's 2021 congressional district map, which a lower court held was a racial gerrymander because it only contained one majority-black district out of the state's seven.

“I don’t think we can assume that just because race is taken into account, that that necessarily creates an equal protection problem,” Jackson said during oral arguments Tuesday in the case Merrill v. Milligan .

“Because I understood that we looked at the history and traditions of the Constitution and what the framers and founders thought about, and when I drilled down to that level of analysis, it became clear to me that the framers themselves adopted the equal protection clause, the 14th Amendment, the 15th Amendment in a race-conscious way," Jackson added.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; 15thamendment; 1619project; 2ndamendment; abortion; anthonyfauci; anwr; badamendment; banglist; bidenflation; blackkk; blackliesmanors; blackliesmatter; blacklivesmatter; blm; covidstooges; criticalracetheory; crt; defundthepolice; diversityjudge; ecoterrorism; ecoterrorists; ericadams; fifteenthamendment; fourteenthamendment; globalwarminghoax; greennewdeal; ketanjibrownjackson; keystonexl; neoracism; newyork; newyorkcity; nra; obamacare; opec; paulryan; plannedparenthood; progressiveracism; racismbyanyothername; righttolife; roevswade; scotus; secondamendment; supremecourt; unqualifiednegress; vaccinemandates; whatisawoman; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: bitt

Let a computer draw the Congressional Districts maps, apportioned by population only. That is the only EQUAL way to do it. But ‘creating racially sensitive Districts’ is enshrined in our Laws now…..what racism?


41 posted on 10/07/2022 2:11:51 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Will the computers be managed by Dominion?


42 posted on 10/07/2022 2:14:20 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Don't rush to your death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: C210N
The 14th made us ALL into slaves essentially. . . The 14th created a new entity that never existed prior - the creation of the 'American citizen'.

Exactly, and 14th was requisite and foundational for even more diabolical and antithetical 16th.

43 posted on 10/07/2022 2:17:42 AM PDT by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

WINNAH, WINNAH, CHICKEN DINNAH!!

ONLY took 34 posts before you ever-so-astutely pointed out the MOST glaring disconnect in her blather.

Framers? 14th and 15th Amendments?? Like — pfft! — we’re NOT talkin’ Bill of Rights, anymore, by that point!

It’s always interesting to see how easily the left sucks people into debating their points, in spite of these sorts of frequent Grand Canyon-esque factual impossibilities.

Are we THAT ready to engage the debate? Forget not seeing the forest for all the trees, this is next level — the leftist says the Sahara is too heavily wooded and we’re flying off to the backside of f’n Egypt to rev our chainsaws and swing our axes in the sand.

What next? Tilting at windmills?


44 posted on 10/07/2022 2:21:26 AM PDT by HKMk23 (https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

NEVAH!

If Dominion corruption isn’t exposed more, Republicans may as well throw in the towel.


45 posted on 10/07/2022 2:33:19 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
This is what "racially sensitive districts" looks like.

This is a new (gerrymandered around Corpus Christi) district created after the 2010 reapportionment.

It went 61-38 for Obama in 2012, 59-37 for Clinton in 2016, but 51-47 for Biden in 2020. It is the district that flipped to Republican for the first time in 150 years when the people voted for Mayra Flores in June.

Here is an example of a district that was gerrymandered racially.

Florida CD-5 = Al Lawson (D-Tallahassee)

He supposedly represents Tallahassee, but his district runs all the way to Jacksonville?

The problem with the district is that it is long and narrow, spanning from Tallahassee to Jacksonville. Districts should be compact so that the people being represented share common issues.

It's hard to imagine that the people of Tallahassee (western panhandle, FSU, state government workers) have the same issues as the people of Jacksonville (Atlantic coastal, seaport, densest Florida city).

Here is Dan Crenshaw's (R-TX) old gerrymandered district from 2010 (includes Humble, Memorial, Montrose, Rice University):

Here is Lizzie Fletcher's (D-TX) current district. She used to represent the wealthiest neighborhoods and the so-called Energy Corridor when she took the seat from longtime Republican Rep. John Culberson, but was just gerrymandered to the south, giving River Oaks, Memorial, Katy, and the Energy Corridor back to Republican representation.

Her new district includes the liberal Montrose and Rice University sections that used to be in Dan Crenshaw's district (Crenshaw moved northwest to take over The Woodlands), plus the Asian and Hispanic sections of Ft. Bend County.

Here are other obviously racially gerrymandered districts across the country.

Debbie Dingell's current district:

Sheila Jackson Lee's district:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' district:

Ayanna Pressley's district:

Rashida Talib's district:

Maryland CD3 = John Sarbanes (D-Baltimore).

Texas CD33 = Mark Veasey (D-Ft. Worth)

Illinois CD4 = Jesús "Chuy" Garcia (D-Chicago)

Texas CD35 = Lloyd Doggett (D-Austin)

Louisiana CD2 = Troy Carter (D-New Orleans)

Is this what "progressive originalism" is supposed to look like?

-PJ

46 posted on 10/07/2022 2:35:52 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I guess. I would love to see a population oriented map. I’m sure we would lose some Districts, but I’m sure others would make up for those lost.


47 posted on 10/07/2022 2:47:04 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bitt

She doesn’t know her history. Progressives want to crush and remake history, not understand it. The framers were long dead when the 14th came along.....
Because I understood that we looked at the history and traditions of the Constitution and what the framers and founders thought about, and when I drilled down to that level of analysis, it became clear to me that the framers themselves adopted the equal protection clause, the 14th Amendment, the 15th Amendment in a race-conscious way,”


48 posted on 10/07/2022 3:10:20 AM PDT by Michigan Bowhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

She’s very chatty when it comes to race, but refuses to define the term ‘woman’. I guess she picks her spots.


49 posted on 10/07/2022 3:20:37 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Here’s another idea: eliminate House districts entirely. Have every House member represent his or her state as an at-large representative: Just put all the House candidates from a state on a ballot and rank them by the number of votes they get on Election Day. If your state has 10 House seats, then your ballot may have several dozen — or several hundred — names on it. The candidates are then ranked based on the number of votes they received on Election Day, and the top ten are the winners.

Some (maybe most) states operated this way in the early years of this country. I believe South Carolina was the last state to eliminate at-large House representation and use districts instead — in the 1820s.

If nothing else, this would eliminate a lot of stupidity in the political process and stop wasting time in state legislatures and courts.

50 posted on 10/07/2022 3:37:54 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drSteve78
After reading through the transcripts of the oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the two major COVID mandate cases earlier this year, I determined that Supreme Court justices may well be the dumbest people you’ll ever encounter in a professional setting.

If KBJ has the intellect and wisdom of a grapefruit, she might actually make the justices smarter collectively.

51 posted on 10/07/2022 3:46:52 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: C210N

And then the next sentence, we get demoted to being: “subject”. The Federal Governemnt is the subject!


52 posted on 10/07/2022 4:05:23 AM PDT by Theophilus (It's fake and defective)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Then we’re having all democrats elected in illinois by Chicago, like senators. No thanks.


53 posted on 10/07/2022 4:16:25 AM PDT by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Not sure what she is trying to say ...

Neither does Affirmative Action Jackson.

The woman is grotesquely underqualified to serve as a SC Justice.

54 posted on 10/07/2022 4:16:34 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

Took 34 replies to make the best point ! Only make mention because it Screams out. Good job.


55 posted on 10/07/2022 4:37:35 AM PDT by WorksinKOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bitt

It’s a tossup, to be determined.

She’s Black and she’s a woman. as such, she has two agenda’s that have nothing to do with the law she is sworn to uphold.

I think that the Black agenda will prevail. She’s a professional Black, Black for a living

Political analysis


56 posted on 10/07/2022 4:41:11 AM PDT by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TiGuy22
How do you figure that? Illinois has 12.7 million people. About 5.2 million live in all of Cook County. Illinois has 17 seats in the House of Representatives. You don’t think a single Republican could even finish in 17th place in an open statewide election?

Unlike a statewide race for senator or governor, the scenario I described is not a “winner take all” election. It’s more like an “everyone gets a gold medal as long as you finish in the top 17” contest.

57 posted on 10/07/2022 4:42:40 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The racist, not knowing what a women is judge has now created a cute term for just making up whatever she wants. How Democrat.


58 posted on 10/07/2022 4:46:23 AM PDT by Vision (Elections are one day. Reject "Chicago" vote harvesting. Election Reform Now. Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Big difference between persons and people. A ‘person’ can be a corporation, according to legal dictionaries. A ‘people’ can be, or apprised of, human beings. A ‘person’ can also be a public servant.

The Constitution’s usage of ‘person’ and ‘people’ are very carefully chosen.


59 posted on 10/07/2022 5:06:21 AM PDT by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

The 14th was just one of many diabolical chips against We the People. It was the setup, perhaps for much worse, but the setup was a requirement.


60 posted on 10/07/2022 5:07:46 AM PDT by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson