He’s still alive?...........................
some newshound...
Bernstein said, “the mad king that she was picturing today.”
I got a bridge I would like to sell to this idiot leftist.
Having that view makes one evil and sick and likely eligible for treatment in a mental illness facility. What an arse.
The seditious president is Biden, preceded by Obama. Both should be tried for treason.
Another paid Democrat liar.
He and that other idiot Woodward have been living off Watergate for almost five decades.
Trying to go back to the crowd to calm them is seditious?
It’s remarkable that even with blatant, provable lies, Republican leadership won’t open their mouths in defense of Trump. And they want our votes.
Lol, that under qualified bimbo was there with Cruz, Scalise and Meadows for bringing drinks and giving blowjobs. Just another lying scorned chick.
Nixon bad
Clinton no problem
Obama even less of a problem
Trump really really bad
Am I seeing a pattern Here?
And Bernstein was spoon fed a story about watergate by the FBI 50 years ago. So now he’s some kinda oracle?
he’s still stuck on watergate...
Another useless old fossil heard from. It is quite pathetic that these people have no clue how irrelevant they truly are.
Bernstein’s assessment of Ms Hutchinson’s testimony as proof makes me question the validity of his Watergate reporting and the reliability of information and ‘proof’ he used to help bring down a former President. We’re his journalistic standards always so flimsy, suspect and fraudulent?
He is such a pathetic hack.
You see, Trump was seditious because he knew that Congress should not consummate the election; he spoke against it.
Now...ask Berstein if there was ANY fraud in the elction.
I guarantee he will lsay that there was but not enough to change the elction.
So...a little bit of fraud is OK?
Where is the line, then?
SCOTUS has already said, “Fraud vitiates everything.”
No levels there.
In a national election, a fraudulent vote in Arizona illegally cancels (not replaces) a legal vote Indiana.
Think strategically: was her Bullshitey Made-Up Not Accurate Easily Disproven testimony a positive or negative for Trump?
How many minds will be changed, each way?
Will anyone who would have voted for Trump two days ago now say they wouldn’t?
Still trying to be relevant - this nutbag has been chasing Trump for years 🤪
“She gave the picture of a mad king. That’s what picture she drew was. “
Bernstein gives away the game with this — if it needed giving away. The Dems desired to paint a damning picture. Hutchinson performed as their script required, except that she jumped the shark with the “Trump tried to carjack his own limo” yarn. That destroyed the credibility of her entire narrative.
Bernstein’s concept of “proof” is a hoot: third-hand hearsay repeated by someone not subject to cross-examination.
Sure, proven by a one-sided show trial without any defense.
Wattle boy does not believe in anyone whose views he opposes having access to a defense, or the ability to examine or impeach the “Witnesses.” Like Che said, “A trial is for the bourgeois.”