Posted on 02/20/2022 8:58:24 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The New York Times made an eye-popping admission on Sunday regarding data collected by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) on Covid-19 vaccines.
In an article titled, "The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects," reporter Apoorva Mandavilli writes: "For more than a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has collected data on hospitalizations for Covid-19 in the United States and broken it down by age, race and vaccination status. But it has not made most of the information public."
Mandavilli, who covers science and global health for the Times, reported that the agency has published "only a tiny fraction of the data it has collected" since the pandemic began, including data on booster efficacy for 18 - 49 year-olds, a tremendous chunk of the U.S. population.
Reasons listed include bureaucracy, sample size, and not being "ready for prime time," but one that's definitely set to raise lots of eyebrows is the claim that the data could be "misinterpreted" by Covid vaccine skeptics.
"The C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year ... The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public ... because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective."https://t.co/hecPyHmWQn— Scott Morefield (@SKMorefield) February 20, 2022
From the report:
Last year, the agency repeatedly came under fire for not tracking so-called breakthrough infections in vaccinated Americans, and focusing only on individuals who became ill enough to be hospitalized or die. The agency presented that information as risk comparisons with unvaccinated adults, rather than provide timely snapshots of hospitalized patients stratified by age, sex, race and vaccination status.
But the C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.
Instead, health experts have been forced to rely on data from Israel and elsewhere to make decisions, the Times reported.
Anyone paying attention knows the CDC is but a scarred and wrinkly appendage of the Democrat Party and Teachers Unions, thus it is not to be viewed as a reliable source for the truth.
Sick people.
Geez! Ya think?!!!!
And yet another perfectly good conspiracy theory bites the dust!
2021: The vaccines are ineffective == CONSPIRACY THEORY
2022: The vaccines are inffective == TRUE because the CDC finally admits it
I NEED NEW CONSPIRACY THEORIES -- ALL MY OLD ONES HAVE COME TRUE
DANG!!
Although "infective" would be yet another perfectly good conspiracy theory.....
Inffective is a Fauci gene modified inFfective, so you are still correct.
If the data made their case they would release it.
It’s no wonder why their bull shit was wildly different from the result we saw in Israel and other countries.
What a travesty this givernment was so amoral and dishonest in its distribution of information that was needed to make good decisions instead of this nonsense we’ve been put through these last two years.
Just because you can still get the virus after being double jabbed and boosted and still be contagious to others shouldn’t make you think that the vaccine is ineffective.
That translates into “We think you’re stupid and have to tell you what to think.”
Pinkos gonna commie.
Not true.
They could climate change the dara and just use the data that supported their position, kind of what they are doing now but more deliberately so.
Or they could just create data out of thin air which their side has done before as well.
“But the C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.”
Ya don’t say?
Yesterday there was a thread on vaccine neurological problems being “quietly” studied. Now a thread on the CDC being “reluctant” to release vaccine data collected.
Hmmm… What could all this quiet reluctance, slow walking data possibly mean?
The vaccines are effective allright. Effective at giving people blood clots and heart attacks.
Correct. I came to a similar conclusion in the Spring of 2020 after a brief study.
See here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3832892/posts?page=47#47
.
These people need to HANG
“because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.”https://t.co/hecPyHmWQn— Scott Morefield (@SKMorefield) February 20, 2022”
Since when was it anyone’s responsibility to decide for me what I should believe about any truthful fact!
This is no different than a cult saying there is information to dangerous for you to know because you are not enlightened enough to understand it correctly.
THESE PEOPLE ARE EVIL.
no one should make a decision on the risk to me health for a medial treatment other than the person themselves.
They all lied and are still doing so
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.