Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The moment I heard Harry & Meghan had used the Queen's personal pet name for their new daughter, it reeked of Meghan's trying to get herself back on the Queen's good side ... classless

At some point Harry has got to speak out about being exploited like this!!

1 posted on 06/09/2021 8:15:30 PM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: canuck_conservative

WGAF.


2 posted on 06/09/2021 8:17:14 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

In my lifetime, I’ve never seen a more pronounced example of
a man being pu—y whipped.

She has his anatomy in the iron grip of her clutches.

Harry, you’re going down with the dingy. Have some dignity
and control your own fate for once.

He acts like he was a virgin until she came along.

You screwed up boy.

You know folks, this is why he doesn’t understand our 2nd
Amendment. He has no right to express his views even in
his marriage / his home.


4 posted on 06/09/2021 8:24:22 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Folks, if you haven't yet, please start an automatic monthly for Jim and his crew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Agree, the choice of name sounded more like an
attempt to suck up to the Queen..Those two are
clueless, how can they possibly think by choosing
a name that was the Queen’s nickname, that the
Queen would just ignore how much they have trashed
her family in public.
Now, wouldn’t it be nice if Megan and Harry could
just find a private island to retire to so they
would have the privacy they claimed they wanted.


5 posted on 06/09/2021 8:25:35 PM PDT by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

They should have named her Nannette.


8 posted on 06/09/2021 8:28:55 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

the moment I heard about it, my first reaction was, it was a malicious theft of an intimate property, especially after trashing her mother in law as racist, with her friends calling the Queen the ‘poster for white supremacy’. An intimate familiarism used by one lover to another for well over three-quarters of a century deserves respect as something personal to the Queen. Had her nickname been ‘pickles’ would that be the baby’s name?

To add to her obtuse insults towards the Crown and the British in particular, Sparkles’ new ego-laden ‘children’s’ book pictures her hubby in an American, not British, military uniform, demoted to the rank of chicken-feeder and bench-sitter.


12 posted on 06/09/2021 8:30:57 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GXPd0fnpKw

Comedian Sam Kinison on marriage...”You going out?..._ .this is so like Harry


16 posted on 06/09/2021 8:37:43 PM PDT by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

So they chose the Queen’s nickname as their child’s name. How is this exactly “currying favor” with someone, especially the Queen? Its quite presumptuous.

Its not quite as bad as them naming their dog with the Queen’s nickname, but then again, these two idiots are capable of anything.


18 posted on 06/09/2021 8:42:30 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Harry, formerly known as Prince, and his brown sugar Thot.


22 posted on 06/09/2021 8:46:46 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Poor kids are just as bright, just as talented, as white kids." - Joe Biden Aug 8, 2019)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

“Relations between the Sussexes and the Royal family have become strained after a series of interviews...”

The writer seems to be addressing his article to Martians who are the only ones who do not know that Harry and Megan gave interviews to Oprah that caused stress to the family.


34 posted on 06/09/2021 9:43:41 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Love bombing is a technique used by narcissists to try to win others back into their circle of control.This is definitely an attempt to try to win back the favor of the Queen. Once the narcissists regain control, they either belittle them (Oprah Interview) or discard them (Leaving for the U.S.?) They will then repeat the process, but only if you let them. They crave attention and will suck the life out of anyone that has a relationship with them.

While Diana became the Princess of the people, MM is the Queen of Drama.


35 posted on 06/09/2021 9:51:28 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (Escaped CA, not going back except to visit a friend or two perhaps every two years. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative
At some point Harry has got to speak out about being exploited like this!!

He's in on it. He's stupid, but he is also a collaborator, and she's effective at helping him settle scores.
36 posted on 06/09/2021 9:53:35 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (“At first you go bankrupt slowly, then all at once.” -- Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

I’m really sick of all this Meghan bashing. I think she was treated shamefully by the British press because 1) she is an American, and 2) she is racially mixed. How the heck do we know she is any of these horrible things that are being said about her? We have no personal knowledge of this whatsoever. All we are doing is repeating nasty slander against a young American woman who happened to marry into the British royal family. Also, why all the nastiness toward Prince Harry? After all, the royal family likely murdered his mother. Why shouldn’t he have some issues with that, that carry over to his life in general? Why are we allowing the British press, probably on the order of the royal family, continue to slander Meghan like this? Why aren’t we on the side of our fellow American even if she is a clueless liberal. Besides, “Lilibet” is a charming name for a little American girl whose great-grandmother is the Queen of England, and not so childish that she will feel silly when she is an adult.


37 posted on 06/09/2021 9:58:39 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Harry doesn’t think he’s been exploited at any point.


39 posted on 06/09/2021 10:02:14 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative
At some point Harry has got to speak out about being exploited like this!!

Harry's too dense to fully understand he's being lead around by his nose ring.

He is destined to "learn the hard way."

41 posted on 06/09/2021 10:14:55 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Harry’s wife didn’t choose Lilibet to curry favor, she chose it to belittle the Queen.


47 posted on 06/09/2021 10:47:18 PM PDT by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Here’s the thing—much as I find Megan and Harry to be manipulative spoiled brats, paybacks are hell and the Queen had it coming after the way she treated Diana, probably had Diana killed and allowed that dippy Charles to marry horseface.


49 posted on 06/09/2021 11:00:21 PM PDT by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Psychos do not take well to being told “No”. She despises the Queen with a deep rage.

Remember when the Queen told H & M they could NOT use the word “Royal” for their charity’s name, and Meghan responding “No one owns the word “Royal”? Well, this is Meghan saying to the Queen: “You don’t own the word Lilibet”.

A bullseye strike inflicting the deepest wound she could think of. Her way of giving the Queen the finger.

She is one very sick and dangerous creature.


50 posted on 06/09/2021 11:07:35 PM PDT by Kalamata (BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

Diana Elizabeth would have been fine....

But noooooo ....Mr and Mrs Markle have to stir the pot...


52 posted on 06/09/2021 11:38:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

It’s not abut getting on the Queens side...they’ve made their position perfectly clear they’re out of the Royal Family life as they stomped on most of them going out the door and since.

It’s about Meghan securing her position as mother to two Royal grand-children who will always be Royals regardless if their marrage lasts or not. SHE wants that security for herself...


55 posted on 06/09/2021 11:44:06 PM PDT by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

I posted this in an earlier thread:

I don’t think this is honor the queen. After all the shit she stirred up about the royal family, it wouldn’t surprise me if this was to hurt the queen because her husband just passed away.


56 posted on 06/09/2021 11:45:11 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson