Posted on 03/17/2021 9:02:15 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
At some point in the next few weeks, a B-52H bomber will carry a missile high into the air and launch it at an unprecedented velocity toward its target, according to the U.S. Air Force. If everything goes according to plan, that missile will accelerate to more than five times the speed of sound before deploying a dummy second stage that will promptly "disintegrate" somewhere in the atmosphere.
The missile, known as AGM-183A, is supposed to be the first hypersonic weapon — or Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW) — in the U.S. arsenal. It should move so quickly through the atmosphere — about 20 times the speed of sound — at such low altitudes that it's impossible for enemy missile defense systems to shoot out of the air. And its speed means that it can be useful for destroying "high-value, time-sensitive targets," the Air Force said in a statement.
Hypersonic missile designs, including this one, typically involve two stages.
(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...
Just think if Obama was still in office, and running his drone strike war, how many more civilian casualties he would have racked up with these babies.
Sounds like their giving it the Jimmah Cahtah Nuetron Bomb “humanity treatment” test.
Profound thought. Perhaps America is truly no longer a sovereign nation state in the classical sense. Perhaps Trump was the last stand to stop the barbarians at the gates
Because it’s difficult.
So why is it labelled ‘bizarre’ in the title?
So which is it ?
Mach 5 or Mach 20?
It didn’t. The hypersonic and above were classified. Area 51.
I thought it was bizarre that they called it bizarre, and wondered what makes a hypersonic weapon bizarre in the first place. 8>)
... but it probably needs some sort of integrated targeting & sensor network. The weakness with long-range weapons is always the inaccuracy of your targeting data. The problem with high speed weaponry is that the margin of error is exceedingly small. Miss that last turn in toward the target by a fraction of a degree and you literally miss by miles.
bizarre ‘hypersonic’ weapon this month
—
The word ‘bizarre’ is not in the article title - which is: US hypersonic missile test.
here is nothing bizarre about these weapons.
Boeing engineers been working on a hypersonic missile since the mid-60’s. Warhead can be conventional or even just a chunk of metal because of the kinetic energy on impact is devastating.
Yeah, and it’s white too.
Good insight.
Drag and friction can be ameliorated by using a laser to create a plasma in front of a projectile, reducing resistance and therefore drag for the missile to travel through.
Powered by the energy produced by the rocket motor, it is achievable. Don’t ask how I know....
1.0 is a BC equivalent of a bullet in free space.
it does not slow down in one mile. or 1,000 miles.
of course, 1.0 is not the BC of the glider.
But .8 is not out of the realm of plausibility. Long, heavy and precisely machined. In the thin stratosphere it can be hypersonic for quite a distance.
Put that in your ballistic calculator and let us know the precise result?
The Boeing X-51 Waverider is an unmanned research scramjet experimental aircraft for hypersonic flight at Mach 5 (3,300 mph; 5,300 km/h) and an altitude of 70,000 feet (21,000 m). The aircraft was designated X-51 in 2005. It completed its first powered hypersonic flight on 26 May 2010. After two unsuccessful test flights, the X-51 completed a flight of over six minutes and reached speeds of over Mach 5 for 210 seconds on 1 May 2013 for the longest duration powered hypersonic flight.So, there has already been a successful test and it isn't bizarre.
Do you know the difference between a tube and a Dutchman with an absurd sense of humor?
From Wiki:
Almost all rounds have a ballistic coefficient of less than 1.0, but large rounds like the 50 BMG can exceed this normal BC. The higher the number, the less drag the projectile will experience. But a higher ballistic coefficient doesn't necessarily mean it is a better bullet.
My point was that even using highly optimistic numbers, a glider is not much value as a missile.
Please feel free to do your own homework and post. I am not here to be the answer guy to everyones questions.
Shouldn't it be smaller?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.