[Reno89519]

Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

[Jane Long]

Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

---

????

[existentially_kuffer]

Dang, sure looks like fraud to me!

[Jamestown1630]

Don’t you grasp the concept of ‘strategery’?

[Alter Kaker]

Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

I have no clue why Trump hired him. Putting a guy in a courtroom in a high stakes case who hasn't been in a courtroom in 40 years seems like maybe a bad idea?

[dp0622]

Yes Rudy is to blame for all of this..

That fantastic speech in front of the legislature is getting them to act like they are in control of the 20 electoral votes and not have this thing certified yet.

But don’t let facts get in the way of your disliking someone.

Have a good day

[RummyChick]

He is operating a Clown Show

Every day in almost every way I wish there was a team on the ground the likes of which George Bush put together

I will always believe Bannon would have been ready. I will always blame Kushner and Ivanka for this monumental screw up

[Petrosius]

Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

Giuliani did not say that there was no fraud, he did not plead fraud as the issue in this case. He was pleading that the violations of the voting process—which are uncontested—were enough to overturn the legitimacy and certification of the vote.

[AndyTheBear]

Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

Did Giuliani actually say there was no fraud, or was it that he did not argue fraud in this particular case?

[Tejas Rob]

>Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

He didn’t say there was no fraud, just that this particular argument wasn’t about fraud but about voter discrimination. I don’t know why the court even brought it up in their decision.

[caww]

But he hasn’t.....it’s going to Scotus as planned.

[lepton]

Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

---

That is not what he said.

[OIFVeteran]

He has to say that in court because he doesn’t have evidence of fraud. If he claims their is fraud and he has no evidence he could lose his law license and suffer other penalties.

This has been nothing more than a money grab by the Trump organization and the RNC. They are lying that they evidence of fraud and are using smoke and mirrors to throw doubt on the election. And way to many freepers are falling for it.