>Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.
He didn’t say there was no fraud, just that this particular argument wasn’t about fraud but about voter discrimination. I don’t know why the court even brought it up in their decision.
He didn’t say there was no fraud, just that this particular argument wasn’t about fraud but about voter discrimination. I don’t know why the court even brought it up in their decision.Finally someone who gets it. This case is about equal protection and due process. Now, the decision did address that briefly but inadequately:
in proposed Count Four, it challenges giving voters notice and letting them cure ballot defects as violating equal protection. The Campaign could have disputed these practices while they were happening or during the canvassing period. Instead, it waited almost a week after Election Day to file its original complaint, almost another week to amend it, and then another three days to amend it again. Its delay is inequitable, and further delay would wreak further inequity.Bullshit. How could harm have been proved in advance? Stupid. Then this:
A violation of the Equal Protection Clause requires more than variation from county to county. It requires unequal treatment of similarly situated parties.And that's precisely what this complaint alleges. Onward beyond his dumbass court ruling.