Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519
Yep, trust Giuliani to undermine the case, saying there was no fraud.

Giuliani did not say that there was no fraud, he did not plead fraud as the issue in this case. He was pleading that the violations of the voting process—which are uncontested—were enough to overturn the legitimacy and certification of the vote.

28 posted on 11/27/2020 10:06:11 AM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Petrosius; All
Giuliani did not say that there was no fraud, he did not plead fraud as the issue in this case. He was pleading that the violations of the voting process—which are uncontested—were enough to overturn the legitimacy and certification of the vote.

Exactly. It is easier to show violations than proving there is fraud (intentional violations). If these PA judges can't see the obvious violations, the SCOTUS would be more likely to agree with Trump's people. Violations or fraud, the election is bad.

186 posted on 11/27/2020 11:46:39 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (Die-ggl,TWT,FCBK,NYT,WPo,Hwd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antf,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA,ARP,MSNBC )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson