Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Mail-In/Absentee Ballots with No Dates or Handwritten Name/Address Can be Counted!
Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/23/2020 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 11/23/2020 5:24:14 PM PST by SeekAndFind

The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court has once again shown its contempt for a free and fair election.

The PA Supreme Court on Monday ruled that mail-in/ballots with no dates or handwritten names/addresses on the outer envelopes can be counted.

The Trump campaign challenged the decision of the Philadelphia County Board of Elections to count 8,320 mail-in/absentee ballots arguing the voters failed to handwrite their name, address or the date (in some cases a combination of all three) on the outer envelope.

Trump’s legal team argued that the General Assembly set forth in the Election Code the requirements for how a qualified elector can cast a mail-in or absentee ballot.

A voter is required to “fill out, date, and sign” the declaration on the outside envelope the Trump campaign argued (citing 25 P.S. §§ 3146.6(a) and 3150.16(a)).

The Trump campaign argued that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the requirements of the sections of Election Code impose mandatory obligations that the ballots cast falling short of these requirements cannot be counted.

The Philadelphia Board actually argued that the Election Code set forth by the General Assembly does not require them to set aside “timely-filed ballots” for “merely missing handwritten names, street addresses, and/or dates on the signed voter declaration.”

Who cares about filling out the outer envelopes? We are a banana republic.

The Trump team argued that a Pennsylvania court already invalidated 2,349 absentee ballots in Allegheny County where the voter didn’t date their declaration.

Commonwealth Court Judge P. Kevin Brobson last Thursday reversed a lower court judge and directed the “Elections Board to exclude the challenged 2,349 ballots from the certified returns of election for the County of Allegheny.”

“…[There] is an obvious and salutary purpose behind the requirement that a voter date the declaration. The date provides a measure of security, establishing the date on which the elector actually executed the ballot in full, ensuring their desire to cast it in lieu of appearing in person at a polling place. The presence of the date also establishes a point in time against which to measure the elector’s eligibility to cast the ballot, as reflected in the body of the declaration itself,” the judge wrote.

Judge Brobson said the votes in question will not be counted “because the votes are invalid as a matter of law.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court shot down the Trump campaign’s argument and said voters failing to fill out their name/address and date on the envelope is just a “technical violation” of the Election Code and does not “warrant the wholesale disenfranchisement of thousands of Pennsylvania voters.”

“The decision of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas is hereby affirmed. The decision of the Commonwealth Court is hereby reversed and the decision of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas is reinstated.”

Incredible contempt for free and fair elections by the out of control PA Supreme Court. https://t.co/Rl0Y07Yha5

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) November 23, 2020



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bananapennsylvania; bloggers; dirtypasupremes; dirtypennsylvania; dirtypennsyvania; election2020; electionfraud; joebiden; mailinballots; paping; pasupremecourt; pasupremesonarope; pennsylvania; signature; supremecourt; trump; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: noiseman

I have argued since the 90’s that the only way to stop Democrat vote fraud is with overt Rep voter fraud. Only then will the Dems do something to stop it.


41 posted on 11/23/2020 5:52:46 PM PST by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

> Then it’s time for conservatives to fire up the printing presses and fight fire with fire.

“Yes, this rural county with 3,000 residents returned 80,000 votes for the Republican candidate.”

Problem is, we don’t control any big urban centers. Hell, even then they had to resort to 90%+ turnout in some places to get Biden over the line and nobody apparently cares. But you really think judges won’t happily smack down Republicans for trying the same shit?


42 posted on 11/23/2020 5:55:04 PM PST by shaven_llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

> You can just say Soviet States since we’re no longer anything close to being united.

Sure we are, don’t you watch the news, comrade? It’s just a few right-wing fringe nutjobs spoiling everything...


43 posted on 11/23/2020 5:56:19 PM PST by shaven_llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'm losing all hope for our Republic.
44 posted on 11/23/2020 5:57:44 PM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaven_llama
Sure we are, don’t you watch the news, comrade? It’s just a few right-wing fringe nutjobs spoiling everything...




"A four-alarm fire in Downtown Moscow clears way for a glorious new tractor factory, And, on the lighter side of the news, Hundreds of Capitalists are Soon to Perish in Shuttle Disaster."

45 posted on 11/23/2020 5:58:09 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If the Supremes allow this then wouldn’t that work against their own interests? That is, it would put them at risk as well since lack of election integrity makes it easier for the Dems to gain total control and stack the Court.


46 posted on 11/23/2020 5:59:30 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: lizma2
According to Ezra Taft Benson among others, Khrushchev said:
"Your children's children will live under communism, You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright; but we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you; We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands."

A strategy he repeated over & over again during the 50's and 60's...

47 posted on 11/23/2020 6:01:02 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The NCSC did the exact same thing. The rules changes made by the NCAG and the SBOE were clear violations of the state constitution. ONLY the legislature can make changes to rules about absentee ballots. The NCSC ignored the state constitution and the rules were changed!


48 posted on 11/23/2020 6:01:55 PM PST by 100%FEDUP (I'm seeing RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
"You can just say Soviet States since we’re no longer anything close to being united."

Excellent point... Well taken...

49 posted on 11/23/2020 6:03:05 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Absolutely!!

Enough is enough!

Supreme Court MUST OVERTURN this Election Fraud.


50 posted on 11/23/2020 6:03:26 PM PST by HypatiaTaught
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Yup. that was the plan for SCOTUS. There was a reason why Graham was nominating more than 200 judges like clockwork for 4 years BECAUSE of these assholes.


51 posted on 11/23/2020 6:05:11 PM PST by max americana (fired liberal employees at every election since 2008 because I enjoy seeing them cry )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

Kavanaugh is Anthony Kennedy 2.0. Gorsuch has already been all over the board. Hope for the best with ACB. It’s all we can do that this point.


52 posted on 11/23/2020 6:07:29 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

if the Supreme court does not stand up against this blatant fraud that is coming out of Pennsylvania then it is useless, the Dems can pack it with whatever they want


53 posted on 11/23/2020 6:07:30 PM PST by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaven_llama
"Yes, this rural county with 3,000 residents returned 80,000 votes for the Republican candidate."

Problem is, we don’t control any big urban centers.

Bingo. And that's why all the pre-election "Goody, goody gumdrops -- Republicans have a few more new voter registrations than Democrats!" on here was not exactly BS, but simply irrelevant. We gained (relative to Democrats) in registrations in close to 90% of PA counties, but anyone who looked could easily have seen the massive increases for DEMOCRATS in the Philly suburbs. And guess where the epicenter of the fraud was? While all eyes were on the city of Philadelphia, what happened in the suburbs? That's right.

Even if our overall gains in small counties slightly outweigh their gains in bigger counties, it doesn't mean shit for us because the bigger counties are where the fraud is and bigger registration numbers mean a bigger "upper limit" for their fraud.

54 posted on 11/23/2020 6:07:57 PM PST by PermaRag (We have SO many targets, and -- for now -- the means to see they get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

It is in the US Constitution that one must be a US Citizen to vote in Federal elections I believe.


55 posted on 11/23/2020 6:10:10 PM PST by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

It is in the US Constitution that one must be a US Citizen to vote in Federal elections I believe.


56 posted on 11/23/2020 6:10:11 PM PST by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr
We have reached third world status.

Maybe lower?

57 posted on 11/23/2020 6:23:32 PM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

I agree with you. We follow the rule of law but the left has set the new standards. 2020 showed up how to play the game, now we just manufacture more votes than they can.


58 posted on 11/23/2020 6:25:52 PM PST by New Perspective (Proud father of a son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal
This is where it started.


59 posted on 11/23/2020 6:28:55 PM PST by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
On to the U.S. Supreme Court we go!

SCOTUS is not going to hear a case about 8,000 ballots in Pennsylvania-- it won't change the outcome in that state, much less in the total EC votes.

60 posted on 11/23/2020 6:30:54 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson