To: SoConPubbie
On to the U.S. Supreme Court we go!SCOTUS is not going to hear a case about 8,000 ballots in Pennsylvania-- it won't change the outcome in that state, much less in the total EC votes.
To: Lurking Libertarian
SCOTUS is not going to hear a case about 8,000 ballots in Pennsylvania-- it won't change the outcome in that state, much less in the total EC votes.
Bullshit!
This will probably be wrapped up in another case, either way, this effort, by the Trump Team, to get justice where Voting Fraud is concerned will end up in front of the Supreme Court, and you know it.
71 posted on
11/23/2020 7:05:22 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Lurking Libertarian
72 posted on
11/23/2020 7:14:33 PM PST by
BigEdLB
(All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)
To: Lurking Libertarian
said,
"SCOTUS is not going to hear a case about 8,000 ballots in Pennsylvania-- it won't change the outcome in that state, much less in the total EC votes" I'm afraid you're right. Why did they set this up with 8,000 votes?
74 posted on
11/23/2020 7:27:37 PM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson