> Then it’s time for conservatives to fire up the printing presses and fight fire with fire.
“Yes, this rural county with 3,000 residents returned 80,000 votes for the Republican candidate.”
Problem is, we don’t control any big urban centers. Hell, even then they had to resort to 90%+ turnout in some places to get Biden over the line and nobody apparently cares. But you really think judges won’t happily smack down Republicans for trying the same shit?
Problem is, we don’t control any big urban centers.
Bingo. And that's why all the pre-election "Goody, goody gumdrops -- Republicans have a few more new voter registrations than Democrats!" on here was not exactly BS, but simply irrelevant. We gained (relative to Democrats) in registrations in close to 90% of PA counties, but anyone who looked could easily have seen the massive increases for DEMOCRATS in the Philly suburbs. And guess where the epicenter of the fraud was? While all eyes were on the city of Philadelphia, what happened in the suburbs? That's right.
Even if our overall gains in small counties slightly outweigh their gains in bigger counties, it doesn't mean shit for us because the bigger counties are where the fraud is and bigger registration numbers mean a bigger "upper limit" for their fraud.
Would they risk bringing attention to leftist vote fraud by trying to persecute conservatives for doing the same? I don’t know. Maybe that’s a potential strategy: If politicians and the legal system insist upon turning a blind eye to democrat vote fraud, then we crank the fraud up to 11 until they’re forced to do something about it, inadvertently slamming the door on dem fraud in the process.
Sounds crazy to have to say something like that (because it is), but we’re living in a post-constitutional, post-rule of law country now. All that is left is the law of the jungle.