Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Should pick Justice Lagoa .. and Maybe he Will!
09/25/20 | STE=Q

Posted on 09/25/2020 11:24:25 PM PDT by STE=Q

Let's get down to brass tacks --

The communists have been trying to take over our country since world war two... and frankly, they're succeeding!

Senator Bernie Sanders is openly socialist, BLM is admittedly Marxist... and we have Antifa fascists as political enforcers.

Justice Lagoa is biased AGAINST communism and socialism... and THAT"S a bias on the court that I can live with.

She is a logical choice.

Yes, there are a lot of issues that us patriots champion... but if the communists -- under the guise of socialism take over -- these "issues" will be moot, because we well be a republic in name only.

Justice Lagoa's parents fled Fidel Castro's Communist government in Cuba to come to The United States.

Justice Lagoa is the product of her parent's American dream.

Justice Lagoa will defend our constitution and our American way of life.

President Trump has said: "America will never be a socialist country".

I would not be surprised if he selected Justice Lagoa for the Supreme court.

We will see!

Justice Lagoa's credentials

Excerpt:

"Justice Barbara Lagoa was born in Miami, Florida. She received her Bachelor of Arts cum laude in 1989 from Florida International University where she majored in English and was a member of the Phi Kappa Phi honor society. Justice Lagoa received her Juris Doctor from Columbia University School of Law in 1992, where she served as an Associate Editor of the Columbia Law Review. She is fluent in English and Spanish".

https://www.floridasupremecourt.org/Justices/Former-Justices/Justice-Barbara-Lagoa


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chat; constitution; elections; government; stupid; surprise; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: jpsb

I also haven’t read what she wrote in that ruling. Have you?


61 posted on 09/26/2020 7:54:37 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

But she wrote that that would be the correct thing to do.


62 posted on 09/26/2020 7:55:13 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

There is no under oath holding to what scenarios a prospective judge might imagine—other than not ruling out such a scenario that she just doesn’t happen to be imagining.


63 posted on 09/26/2020 7:56:13 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

PS I see on another thread you are being an apologist for Gowdy. That last b in your screen name wouldn’t stand for Bush, by chance, would it?


64 posted on 09/26/2020 7:58:00 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

She wrote that if a devout catholic was required to sign the death warrant and that conflicted with his conscience. Then he/she should recuse themselves. She has always advocated that the law be followed. Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s and give unto the Lord that which is the Lord’s. The Law is Caesar’s domain.


65 posted on 09/26/2020 8:01:26 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Yes


66 posted on 09/26/2020 8:02:10 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

YOu have no argument and aren’t bothering to address the evidence.


That’s the ting about SCOTUS. You never know until start ruling on the court. I’m not sure about Barrett. I expect she will mostly toe the corporate GOP.

However, I am sure Lagoa is the most likely of the two to bend to the pressure of being in the “Ginsburg seat.” She’s got Wise Latina 2.0 written all over her. Patronage from Crist and Guac Boy. Married into high powered Democrat family. Etc.


67 posted on 09/26/2020 8:03:25 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I am not apologist for Gowdy. I simply pointed out that has a member of the House there was absolutely nothing Gowdy could do (other then expose them) to punish those that tried to overthrow our gov. That is the job of DOJ and I have been screaming for DOJ to do it’s damn job.


68 posted on 09/26/2020 8:06:04 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
She has not campaigned to be on the Supreme Court.

Of course not. Who told you that, the Easter Bunny? Open you eyes and educate yourself, they all campaign for these jobs, that's the only way anyone gets one.

69 posted on 09/26/2020 8:11:31 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q

I say no. I’m for Amy.


70 posted on 09/26/2020 8:12:30 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

I hope that I am as wrong about her as I am wrong about her education, but probably not.


71 posted on 09/26/2020 8:12:51 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Could be. You are right that we don’t really know. That they were apparently the two put to the top by the Federalist Society frauds advising Trump says a lot.

Of course, I hope we are wrong and Trump gets a real constitutionalist in there in the next five weeks. Time is short.


72 posted on 09/26/2020 8:38:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
We will rue this choice.

We shall see.

73 posted on 09/26/2020 9:15:11 AM PDT by Ron H. (True Freedom of speech is at Gab.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

There is no one single judge that fits the total bill here so we must pick someone who checks the boxes that most conservatives feel need checking and judge Barrett appears to be that person. The last perfect person was strung up on a cross at Calvary. So folks please don’t try and crucify Judge Barrett just because she failed to check one box you favored out of all the boxes available.


74 posted on 09/26/2020 9:21:59 AM PDT by Ron H. (True Freedom of speech is at Gab.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I’m not a fan of the Federalist Society after Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. The GOP has surrendered on social issues and the SCOTUS nominees they confirm reflect that view. The Senate confirms them to deliver for the Chamber of Commerce and that is all. What we can’t afford now is a traitor like Souter. That is a big risk due to the “Ginsburg seat” issue and Lagoa seems much more likely that Barrett to betray us totally.


75 posted on 09/26/2020 9:26:25 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
.....and my tenure here rivals Methuselah.

Right up there with you.

76 posted on 09/26/2020 9:27:25 AM PDT by Ron H. (True Freedom of speech is at Gab.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
Wicked easy.

GW Bush proved that in spades.

77 posted on 09/26/2020 9:32:54 AM PDT by Ron H. (True Freedom of speech is at Gab.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
GW Bush proved that in spades.

Spot on.

78 posted on 09/26/2020 10:00:59 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...siameserescue.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q

Lagoa could be the female David Souter. Not enough of a track record to read the tea leaves on her. Wait and see on her.


79 posted on 09/26/2020 10:02:04 AM PDT by TheGreatFazool (The Great Fazool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
I hope that I am as wrong about her as I am wrong about her education, but probably not.

If you want a Judge that is a strict constitutionalist and some one that goes by what the text of the law says then there in no one better, male or female, then Amy Barrett. If you want a Republican judge then you will be disappointed.

80 posted on 09/26/2020 10:06:19 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson