Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court suspends own order that temporarily blocks Trump administration's 'Remain-in-Mexico' policy
faux ^ | AO via faux

Posted on 02/29/2020 9:05:37 AM PST by chief lee runamok

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel voted unanimously Friday to suspend an order it issued earlier in the day to block a central pillar of the Trump administration’s policy requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. courts.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3judgepanel; 9thcircuit; 9thcircus; aliens; asylum; ferdinandfernandez; judiciary; ninthccircus; ninthcircuit; ninthcircus; politicaljudiciary; rapinbilljudge; reaganjudge; resistthis; richardpaez; threejudgepanel; williamfletcher
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Liberal activist judges get taken to the woodshed?
1 posted on 02/29/2020 9:05:37 AM PST by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok
<blink>
2 posted on 02/29/2020 9:07:10 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok
Didn't we just flipped the 9th circuit? First time ever?🤔
3 posted on 02/29/2020 9:07:30 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

#WINNING?


4 posted on 02/29/2020 9:07:33 AM PST by blueyon (`nt to be a nothing burger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

9th suspends their OWN ORDER? If that isn’t a sign that the court is run amok and not obeying Constitutional principles then I don’t know what would be.


5 posted on 02/29/2020 9:12:46 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

I think the SC is getting upset with these blanket orders limiting presidential power.


6 posted on 02/29/2020 9:13:29 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
dishonest Clintonoid judges have the court in chaos.
7 posted on 02/29/2020 9:13:56 AM PST by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered tha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
They wanted to disrupt Trump so 'stay in Mexico is racist and unconstitutional because we say so'. But now they are worred about a virus coning to to their home towns so 'stay in Mexcio is prudent application of law'.

Such is what we get when we empower courts with dictatorial power and untether it from the constitution: they do whatever they want and use lawerly words to justify it, whatever it is.

8 posted on 02/29/2020 9:16:50 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok
"Liberal activist judges get taken to the woodshed?"

It's too bad the leftist judges can't be tried, convicted, and taken to the gallows.

9 posted on 02/29/2020 9:17:29 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Decision came from Ferdinand F. Fernandez, William A. Fletcher,and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges - two are Clinton appointees the other Reagan. They are allowing more time is all, not a final decision. Maybe they realized that an en-banke review by the entire 9th circuit court would reverse their first order anyway.


10 posted on 02/29/2020 9:19:26 AM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

“...voted unanimously...”

So, the three judges who voted for this injunction suddenly changed their minds and voted against it?


11 posted on 02/29/2020 9:22:59 AM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

The article seems to flip back and forth between the government’s statements and the opposition. What, in 25 words or less, is going on? Anybody?


12 posted on 02/29/2020 9:23:22 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

Anyone think that the judges thought for a second and realized these types of stays look bad in the face of what is currently going on in the world?


13 posted on 02/29/2020 9:27:04 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
'Didn't we just flipped the 9th circuit? First time ever?"

Right yet they still rule in favor of leftists.

I have said this many times but I will say it again. Conservatives are literally wasting time thinking they are going to get conservative judges. We won't. In a nutshell conservative judges are unicorns. They don't exist. There are only two types of judges. Outright leftists and outright leftists pretending to be conservative to one degree or another. We need to reform the courts to make judges accountable and to remove the lifetime tenure otherwise we will continue to lose. Trying to find a conservative who has spent their lives in a government job, wearing a fancy black robe and sits in a seat high about everyone else and has complete control of that room is a waste of time. True conservatives rarely if ever become judges. It's simply not in our nature to want power over others, or to believe we have some superior reasoning skills, or to be addressed as "your honor" and sit in judgement of others and wield power of everyone. This job attracts the wrong type of person period. It attracts the same type of people who are perpetually in charge of your HOA and they produce the same results. The sooner we realize this fact the sooner we will get to judicial reforms that will have a positive effect.

14 posted on 02/29/2020 9:27:55 AM PST by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

The same judges that ruled 2 to 1 against Trump...stayed their order until Trump can appeal.


15 posted on 02/29/2020 9:28:21 AM PST by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
"What, in 25 words or less, is going on? Anybody?"

They were for it before they were against it. I guess.

16 posted on 02/29/2020 9:33:46 AM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

It was 2-1 - two Rapin Bill judges versus a Reagan judge.


17 posted on 02/29/2020 9:38:42 AM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

I live in Northern Kentucky. We have the best judges in the country, our federal judges are Jim Bunnings son and a veteran judge now on senior status. The old guy is no nonsense wise and intimidating.
He presided over the Sandman v CNN matter. I have no direct knowledge, save experiance with this guy.
I imagine CNN trotted in some big caliber suits, expecting a quick dismissal. After some preliminary discovery a first conference was scheduled. The good judge probably interrupted the CNN suits and said something like “ This matter is going to a jury, where you have a well behave child being trashed and savaged by you media whores. And if you have any brains at all you’ll offer this guy $X or I my direct a verdict in his favor”
And poof, to the suprise of everybody, it quickly settled, and Sandman has a huge balance in his checking account.


18 posted on 02/29/2020 9:39:09 AM PST by drdirt333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

“What, in 25 words or less, is going on? Anybody?”

Here’s my take: They basically chose to override a Supreme Court ruling, based on their hatred of Trump. Then it occurred to them that if they continued with their rant, the Supreme Court would not only stop them, but would stop EVERY nationally-binding ruling coming from the lower courts.

So they wisely (per their agenda) chose to walk it back so that they wouldn’t risk losing their power for national-directives in the future.


19 posted on 02/29/2020 9:40:03 AM PST by BobL (If some people here don't want to prep for Coronavirus, they can explain it to their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok
President Trump has nothing to lose by simply ignoring this order, particularly with the coronavirus fears dominating the narrative. What are the dems going to do, impeach him again? I would love to see some dems going on TV complaining about the "travesty" of not letting "asylum seekers" into the US while we are in the grip of a possible pandemic. Only the most radical leftists would support such a move.

Public sentiment will absolutely be on the President's side. Let them yell and scream about this all they want. It will only hurt the dems with the rational-thinking electorate. Ignore this silly "order" while it is being appealed to SCOTUS. The dems have already used their "impeachment bullet" and it simply bounced off of Trump without leaving so much as a bruise.

20 posted on 02/29/2020 9:41:16 AM PST by American Infidel (Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson