Liberal activist judges get taken to the woodshed?
To: chief lee runamok
<blink>
2 posted on
02/29/2020 9:07:10 AM PST by
tomkat
To: chief lee runamok
Didn't we just flipped the 9th circuit? First time ever?🤔
To: chief lee runamok
4 posted on
02/29/2020 9:07:33 AM PST by
blueyon
(`nt to be a nothing burger)
To: chief lee runamok
9th suspends their OWN ORDER? If that isnt a sign that the court is run amok and not obeying Constitutional principles then I dont know what would be.
To: chief lee runamok
I think the SC is getting upset with these blanket orders limiting presidential power.
6 posted on
02/29/2020 9:13:29 AM PST by
Raycpa
To: chief lee runamok
"Liberal activist judges get taken to the woodshed?"It's too bad the leftist judges can't be tried, convicted, and taken to the gallows.
To: chief lee runamok
“...voted unanimously...”
So, the three judges who voted for this injunction suddenly changed their minds and voted against it?
11 posted on
02/29/2020 9:22:59 AM PST by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
To: chief lee runamok
The article seems to flip back and forth between the government’s statements and the opposition. What, in 25 words or less, is going on? Anybody?
To: chief lee runamok
Anyone think that the judges thought for a second and realized these types of stays look bad in the face of what is currently going on in the world?
To: chief lee runamok
President Trump has nothing to lose by simply ignoring this order, particularly with the coronavirus fears dominating the narrative. What are the dems going to do, impeach him again? I would love to see some dems going on TV complaining about the "travesty" of not letting "asylum seekers" into the US while we are in the grip of a possible pandemic. Only the most radical leftists would support such a move.
Public sentiment will absolutely be on the President's side. Let them yell and scream about this all they want. It will only hurt the dems with the rational-thinking electorate. Ignore this silly "order" while it is being appealed to SCOTUS. The dems have already used their "impeachment bullet" and it simply bounced off of Trump without leaving so much as a bruise.
20 posted on
02/29/2020 9:41:16 AM PST by
American Infidel
(Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
To: chief lee runamok
26 posted on
02/29/2020 9:52:16 AM PST by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: chief lee runamok
So..This ruling is going to soak in the ‘Wide latrina.’?
39 posted on
02/29/2020 10:50:15 AM PST by
Beagle8U
(Did Eric Ciaramella kill Epstein? He didn't kill himself.)
To: chief lee runamok
This smoke begs the question of what the fire is...?
This could be a big deal, something appears to be up....
To: chief lee runamok
Panicked by the coronavirus.
To: chief lee runamok
I suspect some informal polling amongst other 9 circuit judges told them that an en banc decision would stay the order. One way or the other, there was some serious backroom politics that went into this flip flop.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson