This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 05/30/2019 5:47:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness |
Posted on 05/28/2019 7:30:03 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Former US Attorney Joe diGenova says that the Huber investigation into the Clinton Foundation is a farce. Huber hasnt even interviewed the top witness in the case whom diGenova represents!
John Huber is the special prosecutor tapped by former AG Jeff Sessions to investigate FISA abuses by Obamas DOJ/FBI. Sessions nominated Huber to perform this investigation after numerous calls for a special investigation into the Clinton Foundation and the Deep State.
But months ago we reported that nothing was getting done. Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee say John Huber still has not interviewed key witnesses and they want answers.
Mark Meadows (R-NC), Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Doug Collins (R-GA) sent a letter to special prosecutor John Huber on January 8th demanding answers by a January 21st deadline.
Your investigation has been ongoing for over nine months. During the course of our extensive investigation we have interviewed more than a dozen current and former DOJ and FBI personnel, and were surprised to hear none of these potentially informative witnesses testified to speaking with you, the GOP lawmakers wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Word, nukka
#troofitsoutthere
Finally some truth, Such strong convictions LOL
You are nothing but some anonymous poster on the internet.
PS admiral Rogers is the reason we know what we know now.
The fact you don’t trust him says a lot.
Hate to say it, but Sessions needs to be investigated.
Yep, and anyone who would believe me if I told them to trust Obama appointees to investigate the wrongdoings of other Obama appointees, would be a moron.
But we're supposed to believe YOU, an anonymous internet poster when you say NOT to trust them, right?
*rolls eyes AGAIN*
Try to make sense when you post, please.
Thank you.
#CantHaveItBothWays
#MyEyesGonnaRollOuttaMyHead
That’s silly. Adjusting one’s belief on proof to the contrary is common sense. What does that have to do with convictions? Your definition of conviction is insanity.
Again not one arrest has happened. We have been deceived by our government thousands, upon thousands of times. I don’t think it is unreasonable to have a wait and see attitude. Do I see positive things happening? Yes. But, I have been fooled plenty of times before.
When Comey is arrested for committing a crime in front of millions of people, I promise to shift my conviction. The case against him is open and shut.
So, are dozens of others, not one arrest.
You didn’t need to tell us you’ve been fooled before. Your screen name already clued us in.
To be honest, I'm responding to the postings of fools. That's not trolling. That's truth telling.
You have opinions. I have opinions. You say you have evidence. I say I have evidence. I see things different than you do. We argue. How is that trolling? Would it be better if everybody got on a thread and agreed that all is lost, nothing's happening (despite all that's happening) and called people who are paying attention "kooks"?
So, are we going to believe our lying eyes or you?
Not at all. You are supposed to believe what you wanna believe. Free country and whatnot.
What is going to happen (or not happen) will happen. Our arguing will change nothing. Though support for the President is crucial to his success. Balling up and crying isn't support.
,,,all evidence points to him not impaneling a Grand Jury to even get one.
"All evidence" you say? Evidence to prove a negative? What is this mysterious evidence. That they didn't have a press conference or send you a memo? C'mon, man.
Did you watch that video link I posted above? Did you see the part where Whitaker explained WHY he couldn't talk about certain things? Because of the Huber/Horowitz investigations. And that's the same reason the FBI doesn't release certain information to Congress or the public.
This is simple stuff. In the old days, when derps controlled all the agencies, redacting and not releasing/testifying to certain information was exactly what you are talking about. But there are legitimate reasons not to release grand jury information, and this time the good guys are running things.
You can choose to believe that there are no good guys if you like.
Time will tell. If you can read the tea leaves, you should know where this is heading. It's becoming fairly obvious, even out here beyond the trees.
I'll take comments that won't age well for $500 Alex
McCabe Investigated Not Just Trump but Sessions Too
Top FBI official Andrew McCabe did not just investigate President Trump. As he notes in a little-publicized part of his new book, McCabe even investigated his department boss then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions after Senate Democrats asked McCabe to look into allegations Sessions perjured himself during his confirmation hearings when he denied meeting with Russian officials during the 2016 campaign.
Yea, I was gonna say.
But I'm too polite.
Would you describe what you've seen on this thread (and other threads for over a year by mostly the same people) as a "wait and see attitude"?
Be honest, now.
Ha, ha. I will never live down the screen name. :(
Don't worry. I voted for W twice, aggressively supported him, went to his rally in Fresno. Got excited when he waved to me and my friends on a lonely downtown street as his limo rolled by, him and his wife. I even got a W hat.
Now I know how I was duped.
The times they are a changing.
#TheGreatAwakening
Conversations have generally deteriorated on Freerepublic and its a shame. I try to do my upmost and present my point in a respectful way. When im proven wrong by the strength of another argument I admit it immediately. This happens more then I would like. As far knee jerk one line posters I generally ignore them so I can answer your question about their past posts.
Well, if you get a chance, re-read this thread. If that looks like a "wait and see attitude" to you, then I'll eat my hat.
It's been much worse, I'll grant you. These so-called "skeptics" are losing steam as their arguments fall one by one over time. As you can see, all they have left is a re-hashed "Huber's doing nothing" article, which has been posted over and over again for months, Sessions bashing, and a general NOTHING'S EVER GONNA HAPPEN mantra.
But all the while things ARE happening, which they fail to acknowledge or understand what it all means and where it's heading.
It's fascinating to watch, actually, and appeals to my sense of humor. But in the end, it's not really funny as so much is at stake.
Not just for our country and our future, but for that of the world.
This is not a game.
what is the president doing about it?
“But we’re supposed to believe YOU, an anonymous internet poster when you say NOT to trust them, right?”
Nope, you just have to use common sense. Well, you would, if you had any.
“The fact you dont trust him says a lot.”
The fact that you trust anyone in government says a lot.
Projection Speculation.
Qtips quote anonymous sources from porn cites as facts and evidence.
Normal people do not.
Ahhh, common sense. Is that what you used to figure it all out?
*rolls eyes frikken AGAIN*
Your honor, I submit Boogieman's common sense as exhibit Q.
Hahahahahahahahahaha.
#AnonymousInternetCommonSenseBoogieMan
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.