Can't review and report without investigating, sleepy.
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 05/30/2019 5:47:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness |
Posted on 05/28/2019 7:30:03 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Former US Attorney Joe diGenova says that the Huber investigation into the Clinton Foundation is a farce. Huber hasn’t even interviewed the top witness in the case whom diGenova represents!
John Huber is the special prosecutor tapped by former AG Jeff Sessions to investigate FISA abuses by Obama’s DOJ/FBI. Sessions nominated Huber to perform this investigation after numerous calls for a special investigation into the Clinton Foundation and the Deep State.
But months ago we reported that nothing was getting done. Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee say John Huber still has not interviewed key witnesses and they want answers.
Mark Meadows (R-NC), Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Doug Collins (R-GA) sent a letter to special prosecutor John Huber on January 8th demanding answers by a January 21st deadline.
“Your investigation has been ongoing for over nine months. During the course of our extensive investigation we have interviewed more than a dozen current and former DOJ and FBI personnel, and were surprised to hear none of these potentially informative witnesses testified to speaking with you,” the GOP lawmakers wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Can't review and report without investigating, sleepy.
The links weren't for you, sparky.
They're for people interested in knowing things.
"When the facts are on your side, pound the facts. When the law is on your side, pound the law. When neither is on you side, pound the number of links.”
~Dead White Male
Re-read the thread, sparky, and see who exactly brought up that thing you mentioned and keeps talking about it.
You may be surprised.
Are they gonna get zotted?
TRIGGER WARNING
SENSITIVE IMAGES TO FOLLOW
The Trump Administration requested he resign and was renominated by POTUS
The three Obama holdover US attorneys that Trump did not fire when he took office:
Dana Boente
Rod Rosenstein
John Huber
bagster post #141:
"Can't review and report without investigating, sleepy."
LOL!
You warn against getting "bogged down" in the difference between 'review' and 'investigation' in one post, and then in your latter post, you get bogged down...
LOL!
“Review” is such a little word to be arguing semantics and hang your whole argument on, don’t you agree?
Kinda lawyer speak, “We don’t really have crosshairs on your assets, we’re just reviewing”.
Stephen E. Boyd’s letter to Goodlatte:
EXCERPTS:
“In conducting this review, all allegations will be reviewed in light of the Principles of Federal Prosecution. (USAM 9-27.000)
“As you know, consistent with longstanding policy, the Department does not ordinarily onfirm or deny investigations, and this letter should not be construed to do so. While this policy can be frustrating, especially on matters of great public concern, it is necessary to ensure that the Department acts with fairness and thoughtfulness, and always in a manner consistent with the law and rules of the Department.”
READ p.23
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5764384-DOJ-11-18-MSJ-Declaration.html#document/p23/a485901
9-27.000 - Principles Of Federal Prosecution
EXCERPT:
9-27.200 - Initiating and Declining Prosecution—Probable Cause Requirement
If the attorney for the government concludes that there is probable cause to believe that a person has committed a federal offense within his/her jurisdiction, he/she should consider whether to:
- Request or conduct further investigation;
- Commence or recommend prosecution;
- Decline prosecution and refer the matter for prosecutorial consideration in another jurisdiction;
-Decline prosecution and commence or recommend pretrial diversion or other non-criminal disposition; or
- Decline prosecution without taking other action.
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution
Sessions Letter Shows DOJ Acted on Trump’s Authoritarian Demand to Investigate Clinton
Publish Date: March 9, 2019
“View the Sessions directive to Huber obtained by American Oversight below:”
https://www.americanoversight.org/sessions-letter
Our enemies are sure making noises as if they are being investigated and pissed off as are these anti-Sessions/Trumpers “patriots” that the DOJ doesn’t keep them apprised of their day to day movements via email, memos and personal phone calls.
I guess that’s what makes them so miserable. :)
You warn against getting "bogged down" in the difference between 'review' and 'investigation' in one post, and then in your latter post, you get bogged down...
To be fair, you're not the only dim bulb that keeps harping on the "review" aspect of Huber's directive.
As if you think there's some kind of difference between "review" and "investigation".
Can you review without investigating?
Tripping off the word "review" to make your (wrong) point is being "bogged down". And no. My correcting ignorance is not getting "bogged down".
Somebody needs to bring you people up to speed.
p.s. Acting AG Whitaker said under oath that Huber was investigating (reviewing) along with Horowitz. Did you click my link?
No press releases and no media leaks does not equal no investigation.
Time to come in outta' the cold, Free Reign. Don't wanna miss the show.
BUT THEY SAID REVIEWWWWWWW!!!!!!!
To be fair, you're not the only dim bulb that keeps harping on the "review" aspect of Huber's directive. As if you think there's some kind of difference between "review" and "investigation".
You're either a troll or one of the dumbest posters on the forum.
You're the one who harped on the "review" aspect of the above statement in bold whilst you ignored the point.
Huber's tasks were to review (or investigate) and to report. Huber's tasks were not to review/investigate and to PROSECUTE.
That was the poster's point.
Do you get it?
No, of course you don't.
Can't prosecute without reviewing and investigating, right?
Do you know how the DOJ works?
Read haffast's post above for further information (#149).
You: Huber's tasks were to review (or investigate)…
And now you admit that "review" and "investigate" mean the same thing, essentially.
Baby steps. You'll get there.
(fyi, here's the ignorance you originally agreed with).
Pear-ord.45: Huber wasn’t assigned to do any further investigating. He was assigned to review what had been done and make recommendations as to what he concluded still needed to be done....
Ergo, no grand juries, no subpoenas , no indictments , no arrests and no convictions. Huber`s only task was review and report.
You: This.
I never said otherwise.
And now you admit that "review" and "investigate" mean the same thing, essentially.
I never said there was a difference. You are the one who implied that there was one in post #141.
FreeReign:
Still this!!
Review (investigate) and report. "ERGO no grand juries, no subpoenas , no indictments , no arrests and no convictions".
Sorry things aren’t moving quick enough for you troll but to say no grand juries is just a flat out lie.
Now for future reference your ignorance that something occurred is not PROOF it hasn’t or will not occur.
Prosecutors use grand jury as investigation of Andrew McCabe intensifies
Federal prosecutors have for months been using a grand jury to investigate former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe — an indication the probe into whether he misled officials exploring his role in a controversial media disclosure has intensified
(Excerpt)
Try to grasp how amazing that is. A key Spygate plotter has had a grand jury investigating him for almost a year, and for the first months of its existence, not even a whisper about it reached the ear of anybody in the media. And once news of the grand jury did leak out, there’s been total radio silence since. Given how powerful the leak culture inside Washington is, it has to be asked: How was this accomplished?
Out of 90k indictments, how many will face prison? 1 or 2?
Troll still trolling. Sessions and Huber paying you well?
Troll still trolling. Hillary and Soros paying you well?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.