[bagster]

You warn against getting "bogged down" in the difference between 'review' and 'investigation' in one post, and then in your latter post, you get bogged down...

To be fair, you're not the only dim bulb that keeps harping on the "review" aspect of Huber's directive.

As if you think there's some kind of difference between "review" and "investigation".

Can you review without investigating?

Tripping off the word "review" to make your (wrong) point is being "bogged down". And no. My correcting ignorance is not getting "bogged down".

Somebody needs to bring you people up to speed.

p.s. Acting AG Whitaker said under oath that Huber was investigating (reviewing) along with Horowitz. Did you click my link?

No press releases and no media leaks does not equal no investigation.

Time to come in outta' the cold, Free Reign. Don't wanna miss the show.

[FreeReign]

Huber`s only task was review and report.

To be fair, you're not the only dim bulb that keeps harping on the "review" aspect of Huber's directive. As if you think there's some kind of difference between "review" and "investigation".

You're either a troll or one of the dumbest posters on the forum.

You're the one who harped on the "review" aspect of the above statement in bold whilst you ignored the point.

Huber's tasks were to review (or investigate) and to report. Huber's tasks were not to review/investigate and to PROSECUTE.

That was the poster's point.

Do you get it?

No, of course you don't.