Posted on 12/11/2018 11:21:44 AM PST by fishtank
Earths Magnetic Field Decaying at an Alarming Rate
December 11, 2018 | David F. Coppedge
The biosphere depends on earths magnetic field, but it has been decaying rapidly for at least 1500 years.
In Spacecraft Earth: A Guide for Passengers, Dr Henry Richter describes how the story of the decay of the earths magnetic field caught his attention. He had read the monograph by Dr Thomas Barnes in the 1970s, and realized the implications: if the decay is true, the earth could not be billions of years old. He considered the various proposals for maintaining the field, but none of them work, he concluded. If this is a well-known fact, what do secular geophysicists have to say about it?
(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...
A must-watch for anyone interesting in this topic...
Nova - Magnetic Storm - Earth’s Invisible Shield
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJUTUFAWfEY
Throughout earth history the record shows that the field weakens before a pole reversal. Without a field we will be subject to increased cosmic ray bombardment, which will lead to higher cancer rates and increases in genetic mutations (ie, more liberals).
Exactly this guy, or folks using his work, trying to prove a young earth is laughable. As long as we have a spinning core surrounded by magma we will have a magnetic field. It will wander and poll flip and strengthen and weaken, but its not going anywhere, and the idea that current weakening proves a young earth is not supported.
A must-watch for anyone *interested* in this topic.
____________________________
A must-watch for anyone interesting in this topic...
Nova - Magnetic Storm - Earths Invisible Shield
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJUTUFAWfEY
The article might be new. The theory & assumptions behind the article, and the presentation, is not.
That doesn't sound like a rapid decay rate. But just in case here's a bunny with a waffle...
The vast majority of Earth's protection from galactic cosmic rays is the sun.
yes I know!
Maybe the GPS system provides magnetic declination information. That system provides rather large tables for computing position from all of those satellite fixes. Magnetic declination would add very little to that bulk, especially if it merely provided the coordinates of the instantaneous magnetic north. Maybe I should just get off my butt and read that stuff again.
Good point. I don’t think that it does it directly since the mag pole is a natural thing that can and does move.
Whenever I used the compass in a GPS unit it was for orienteering/orientating wrt north probably for paper maps. But also for taking that first step because your GPS unit requires movement to get direction. Weird. But that is the way they used to work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.