Posted on 08/01/2018 5:46:06 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
WASHINGTON (AP) The Trump administration is citing safety to justify freezing gas mileage requirements.
A draft of a regulation prepared this summer would freeze an Obama-era program that was intended to improve fuel efficiency and cut pollution.
In excerpts obtained by The Associated Press, the administration argues that heavier vehicles are safer than lighter ones and that people would drive more and be exposed to increased risk if their cars get better mileage.
Transportation experts dispute the arguments. Automotive engineer Giorgio Rizzoni of Ohio State University calls the administrations safety claims a stretch.
The draft also shows the administration plans to challenge Californias long-standing authority to enact its own, tougher pollution and fuel standards
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
If it saves one life ...
I had a 1 ton 78 Ford truck with a 10 ft home built flat bed. A lady backed into the street and hit me. It totaled her car. It scratched my paint.
Oh YEA?
Ok, lets take a 1995 Crown Vic and a new Toyota Corolla and hit them head on at 55mph in one of those crash tests and see what happens!
Last fall a woman in a Honda Pilot rear ended me. She couldn’t open her door. Various fluids pouring on the ground.
Some of the reflective tape on my bumper got dislodged.
LOL
He is an author about electric vehicles, so he argues larger electric cars don’t make any trade offs.
Heavy electric cars don’t have the range and take too long to charge. They are crazy expensive to buy and maintain.
Get rid of the ethanol in regular gas and mileage goes up at least 10% instantly!
Yeah i looked him up ad well. He is a published professor who works holds a tenuered chair funded by electric and hybrid car intrest. So his paycheck depends on his position. That would be why the journalists looked him up and included him in the article. For balance. Plus it was easy. Journalists love easy quotes to fluff the article. Just lazy freshman level journalism. Yawn.
Really? Tell you what, Giorgio, how about I get in an F350, you get in a Smart Car and we'll both drive 40 mph and hit head on and see if it's a stretch.
“Bump for heavy trucks!”
We wrapped our kids in an old Ford Explorer XLT during their post-licensing formative years. Not the heaviest of trucks...but the government refused to sell us an Abrams tank. In the case of the oldest child...it was a wise move on our part. The kid could wreck vehicles (yes, plural). Luckily everyone survived her misadventures, including the truck.
Hussein Obama was more concerned with “saving” the planet than saving lives. Plastic and aluminum don’t have the same impact resistance as good old-fashioned steel.
Dude! E-Trailer has you covered on the hitch. But you're gonna need the Carroll Shelby Turbo package to pull that trailer with a Bobcat.
My 2003 Dodge 1500 Hemi Ram Quad-Cab pickup never got better than about 10.2 miles per gallon gas mileage according to it’s computer, but it was pretty bad @ss.
"But they drove with pride....."
I’m in Upstate NY....with a nice heavy car that keeps me safe.
Wow, someone is believing in some basic laws of physics.
I have no need for a truck,but would love to see the Buick Park Ave. brought back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.