Carr: Hillary Clinton, FBI colluded to ambush Donald Trump

Boston Herald ^ | October 27, 2017 | by Howie Carr

[Oldeconomybuyer]

The FBI has always been dirty — consider local G-men Zip Connolly and H. Paul Rico, who were both Mob hitmen, not to mention John “Vino” Morris and a host of other very “special” agents in the Boston office.

Still, the Famous But Incompetent crew has never been as corrupt as it is now shown to be.

The Uranium One Clinton bribery scandal and the dodgy dossier are Watergate on steroids.

That so-called dossier — a remake of “From Russia with Love.” Commissioned and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, it’s 35 pages of fabrications about the Republican candidate for president, breathlessly peddled for months by the Democratic operatives of the alt-left media. When Hillary stopped paying for it, the G-men stepped in as paymasters. They saw it as part of their job — to fix the election.

The fake-news dossier was released in January by BuzzFeed, a cat-video website owned by NBC News. You know, the outfit of Chelsea Clinton, the Rev. Al Sharpton, Brian Williams and Mike Barnicle. NBC News killed Ronan Farrow’s expose on Harvey Weinstein, one of the Clintons’ biggest campaign contributors.

Naturally the alt-left media, now that a scandal seems likely to afflict Democrats, has lost interest in it.

Three months ago, these Democrat hacks were literally accusing Donald Trump Jr. of treason for a 10-minute meeting with a Russian lawyer. Now it turns out that the Democrats funneled $9.2 million to a law firm that then worked with Russians to sabotage the presidential election, and all they can say is, “Everybody does it.”

[Lady Heron]

The word is conspiracy.

[rightwingcrazy]

“Everybody does it.”

Last refuge of scoundrels.

[DesertRhino]

The FBI took off in the radical leftist Wilson progressive era. It was run by a self aggrandizing homo for over 5 decades. It has been eyeballs deep in dirty tricks, illegal domestic spying, and blackmail almost constantly.

Now it is actually moving to establish itself as a 4th branch, literally independent of and beyond the control of the President.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Too bad the FBI can’t be prosecuted under RICO.

[Red Badger]

Now it turns out that the Democrats funneled $9.2 million...

Fusion GPS got $6M, so the lawyer-go-between-firm raked off $3.2M.....................Nice work if you can get it...............

[z3n]

Just like everything in politics, people only care one way or the other based on their affiliation. It’s a switch. It’s amazing to behold because people like to think they have intellectual integrity and they don’t see their absurd bias.

I remember having a debate with certain left-leaning family remembers last summer about Wiki-leaks and potentially getting dirt on Hillary from Russians as well. They thought it was the lowest of the low and that it was illegal and disqualified him from further running for president. He needed to drop out. Even though I typically call myself a libertarian and at that point was giving very little verbal support for Trump, I still defended him in this. I said, if I was campaign manager for president or dog catcher and I heard there was someone who had dirt on my opponent, I would meet with them. I would be less concerned with who it is and more concerned with how credible the information is.

They hissed at at me.

I said, well, what about this golden shower dossier that is rumored to be out there. Is that okay?

Yeah, well if he does all this groping of women or says he does, then maybe he has wild deviant orgies too and the people should know!

I said, doesn’t this seem hypocritical? Do you care that we don’t know who the source is or how credible it is?

**cricket sounds and scowling faces**

All of a sudden, when the tables turn, in light of what we know now, Russians being the source of influence, collusion, and even conspiracy, it’s okay.

We all know why. People whore themselves out to the end result. People don’t really care about details. They have no interest in being fair or about any rules. The only time something is unfair or against the rules is when it hurts their team.

I’m not talking about campaign staffs and beltway insiders. I’m talking about people on the street. Particularly single issue voters. The abortion rights people for example; many of them hate pro-lifers with dark malace, and consider nothing in the political world to have rules. They may not admit as much. They may front some idealistic standing. But they have none.

[Red Badger]

What says they can’t?....................

[TTFlyer]

The FBI needs to be dissolved.

[DesertRhino]

The sneaky, untrustworthy, plotting, snooty, priggish, superiority complex, backstabbing character of the FBI is exactly the personality traits found in the closeted homosexual.

Hoover left his stamp and it is in the DNA of that organization today. Every Marine unit out there today carries the ethos of Iwo Jima, Tarawa, and Hue. And every FBI unit carries that prancing gay gene.

It isn’t fair, it just ,,,is.

[ripley]

Hillary and the Democrat-Socialists are not capable of doing anything wrong. They are as clean and pure as the driven snow and the last Democrat President was the saviour of all mankind.

(Watch Hillary and the scu&bag Progressives in congress skate on the latest revelations.)

/S/

IMHO

[grey_whiskers]

“Everybody does it.”

Last refuge of scoundrels.

In their world, everybody *does*.

(Just like sexual harassment on the physical contact through rape end of the spectrum.)

[Tenacious 1]

Does anyone understand that there is enough evidence RIGHT NOW to get indictments? People could be arrested today for things that have been admitted.

[Grampa Dave]

Conspiracy to committing acts of Sedition!

Sedition is easier to prove and document, as with their own words on the internet or videos of them actually committing acts of sedition on tv.

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2384 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy US Code

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, ;1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII,;330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

[jospehm20]

I have been telling people that for years. It is beyond saving. It needs to be abolished and if it is decided federal police is something we need a new agency can be stood up.

[Grampa Dave]

Great description of the FBI. I added a little.

The FBI took off in the radical leftist Wilson progressive era. It was run by a self aggrandizing homo for over 5 decades. It has been eyeballs deep in dirty tricks, illegal domestic spying, and blackmail almost constantly.

Now, it is actually moving to establish itself as a 4th branch, literally independent of and beyond the control of the President, Congress, the Supreme Court and the American Citizens.

[Dana1960]

There is this tiny part of me that wishes DJT would schedule a press conference and say:

“Not everyone is eager to see the swamp drained.”

...and then walk away from the podium.

[spintreebob]

Transparency in government. It is technologically possible for “everyone” to be granted “browse” ability to virtually all electronic government data.

Of course, Insert, Update, Delete power would still be very limited. Of course, certain national security files and personal privacy files would need to be protected.

But a Tea Party Group hassled by the IRS, or a falsely accused individual could waive all privacy protections and thus force “browse” access to all their data.

This is a step beyond FOIA. FOIA costs taxpayers money for all the government lawyers and staff to fulfill the FOIA requests. There would be little need for FOIA if everybody had browse access.

Private email server? No problem from a transparency perspective. Just require that a cc be sent automatically to the government server for everything on the private server.

National Security? Many things labeled National Security are not national security ... The enemy already knows the data that is hid. Most data hid for National Security purposes is hid to avoid the embarrassment (and illegal activity) of our own bureaucrats.

[Gay State Conservative]

Howie Carr makes reference to Massachusetts matters because he knows the lay of the landscape here better than anyone alive.Whitey Bulger was so angered by Carr that he once tried to have him killed.

Regarding Russia...there can be no doubt that it's the RATS who have the problem,not Trump.

[Scott from the Left Coast]

“and consider nothing in the political world to have rules. ”

And to some extent, based on what we’ve witnessed in the last 30 years at least, you’d have to conclude they were right...except in the political world when polarization becomes as extreme as you ably point out there is rule that becomes absolute...and it’s at the end of the barrel of a gun.