Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/18/2017 9:43:33 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: reaganaut1

No the party of Lincoln is now the party of Hugo Chavez, same as the Democrats.


2 posted on 08/18/2017 9:46:45 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

yeah, yeah, Mona,we get it...you’re so virtuous...


3 posted on 08/18/2017 9:50:04 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

No. But the socialist-democrats are now the party of Hitler, Mao, and Stalin/Lenin, all rolled up into one.

The socialist-democrats are the new american NEO-NAZI party.


4 posted on 08/18/2017 9:50:17 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

No. The party of Lincoln knew how to deal respectfully of people like Lee.

The DNC is trying to scrub their history. That’s what is happening right now.


5 posted on 08/18/2017 9:50:36 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The totally unwarranted self-righteousness just reeks off of prim and proper Mona.


6 posted on 08/18/2017 9:52:25 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

How many people do you suppose are in ANTIFA?

What percentage of our population would they be?

These are a bunch of paid hell raisers.

Obama was in office for eight years and not a peep about statues.

They’re just prostitutes.

They’re paid to screw around.


7 posted on 08/18/2017 9:53:53 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I guess the cocktail party invitations are pending.


8 posted on 08/18/2017 9:54:15 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I think we’re conservatives who like to conserve and preserve. Conservation and preservation.


9 posted on 08/18/2017 9:59:04 AM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

My great grandfather was part of the Army that fought Lee. After the war, he gave his kids the middle name “Lee” - out of respect for the commander of the army he had fought against. One of his sons, my grandfather, did the same.

Oddly enough, none of the kids had “Lincoln” as part of their name...


12 posted on 08/18/2017 10:05:32 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

One of the concepts I learned about in my military studies was

The Golden Bridge.

If you are in combat with someone, give them a chance to quit the fight.

Maybe you offer to let them surrender.

Maybe you let them leave the battlefield but without their heavy equipment.

If you fight someone and make it a fight to the death, then it’s a fight...

To the death.

After four years of War in this country, I think that everyone, everyone, was tired of the butchery.

The Union offered acceptable terms to the Confederate Soldiers and the awful fighting was done.

The Union leaders didn’t make it a fight to the death.

They gave the Confederates a Golden Bridge to go over.

I think that part of this Golden Bridge was that the Confederates could respect their military leaders.

I think that we had a lot of families who had family members in the Confederate Army and they want to respect them.

I believe that we should allow those families the continuation of The Golden Bridge.

Any statues dedicated to slavery, honoring slavery, should be removed.


13 posted on 08/18/2017 10:05:58 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Wow, even Mona is selling us out to become an attention whore.


14 posted on 08/18/2017 10:08:42 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Go to hell Mona Charen. You’re nothing but a nevertrumper, lying b*tch!


15 posted on 08/18/2017 10:12:22 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
All right. The sanctimonious National Review lady implies that because some of the organizers of the original protest used Nazi regalia, including out and out Nazi banners--indeed visible in some of the pictures--that no people of good will were involved. She then attacks General Lee, referring to some issue over prisoner exchanges with General Grant.

I am not familiar with the incident to which she refers. But it is well known that not only did Grant treat Lee & his men with the greatest respect at the surrender; Grant threatened an actual mutiny if the radicals were to arrest Lee, afterward.

Whether the "Nazis" at the rally were genuine supporters of the German Socialist movement, or people playing some sort of role for some other ulterior purpose, it is doubtful that the flag wavers were more committed to imposing monolithic socialist uniformity on America than the counter-protestors, who clearly embraced the tactics the Brownshirts employed in the early 1930s, to intimidate all dissent from the eventual Nazi takeover.

In the clash of those unable to tolerate any dissent, Donald Trump was completely right to lay the blame for the rumble on those who came for that purpose. And completely right to recognize that everyone there was not a party to that intention.

Compulsion For Uniformity

As for General Lee? Miss Charon would have to look long & hard to find a nobler man in any land, at any time. Nor will she find one more genuinely revered by Conservative Americans North & South. His example, after the war, did more than any other to promote reconciliation, based upon mutual respect!

16 posted on 08/18/2017 10:19:45 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

In a galaxy far far away, the party of Lincoln used to be the party of Washington and Jefferson. You know, that thing called the U.S. Constitution.

The Left, media, academia, Hollywood and the Democrat party are the domestic enemy that I took an oath to defeat.

All bets are off.

5.56mm


17 posted on 08/18/2017 10:19:48 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

She doesn’t know her history. At the end of the War, Lincoln wanted to reunite the country, not put his boot on the neck of the South and beat it to death.


19 posted on 08/18/2017 10:23:37 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Another one-time-sensible voice on the right jumps the tracks - even Stuart Varney is starting to wobble - is it really so critical to show that yes you don’t like racists and Nazis just like everybody else that you lose perspective and sight of who really caused the violence in Charlottesville and is the real threat to this country? - it’s for sure not a couple of hundred silly folks advocating causes that are long dead for all intents and purposes.....


20 posted on 08/18/2017 10:23:47 AM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Another historical illiterate.

The parties have in fact changed sides of the aisle since the War Between the States. 1860 Democrats were limited government social and political conservatives with roots in Jefferson’s Anti-Federalism. 1860 Republicans were big government liberals taking their lead from Hamilton’s Federalism.

It’s not conjecture or political hyperbole, it’s historical fact. What once were Republicans now are Democrats, and what once were Democrats now are Republicans.


21 posted on 08/18/2017 10:25:23 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

It’s been the party of RINO for sometime now.


22 posted on 08/18/2017 10:27:08 AM PDT by Leep (Less talk more ACTiON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Mona Charen is a National Review Never-Trumper

On May 23, 2016, she called Mr. Trump an “authoritarian ignoramus”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435743/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-never-trump-people

It is sad watching her and the NR crowd pathetically struggling to be relevant during the Trump Era. Their pride will not let them admit they were wrong. They refuse to admit that the economy is doing pretty well, that Trump has put a conservative on the Supreme Court, that ISIS in Syria has mostly been destroyed and the Fatty in North Korea is, for the moment, backing down. Let’s see, how many of those things would have happened with Jeb! or Mittens in the WH?


23 posted on 08/18/2017 10:32:22 AM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
What benefit does the South gain by staying in the Union? To the rest of the USA we are all Nazi racists bigots Klansman down here apparently that is what happens if you object to a statue of one of our local heroes Robt E Lee. Whay stay in the Union? #SouthExit.

Mona, without Southern pride and conservatism the USA would be fully socialist by now on the way to Communism

28 posted on 08/18/2017 12:18:34 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson