Posted on 01/01/2017 8:17:30 PM PST by DaveinOK54
There are moments within investigative research when your jaw can stand agape as you recognize the scope of what you are reading or hearing. A brutally down-played audio of Secretary John Kerry is just such an occasion.(snip)
This evidence within this single story would/should forever remove any credibility toward the U.S. foreign policy under President Obama. It also destroys the credibility of a large number of well known republicans. What the recording reveals is substantive:
♦ First, only regime change, the removal of Bashir Assad, in Syria was the goal for President Obama. This is admitted and outlined by Secretary John Kerry.
♦ Secondly, in order to accomplish this primary goal, the White House was willing to watch the rise of ISIS by placing their bet that ISIS’s success would force Syrian President Bashir Assad to acquiesce toward Obama’s terms and step down.
♦ Thirdly, in order to facilitate the two objectives, Obama and Kerry intentionally gave arms to ISIS and even, arguably, attacked a Syrian government military convoy to stop a strategic attack upon the Islamic extremists killing 80 Syrian soldiers.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Retweeted and it’s out there, everywhere. Sean Hannity, see what you can do with this tomorrow...
TREASON FILE BOOKMARK
This audio was leaked by the NYT.
Not the Russians.
And roundly ignored by all media.
Until now. At least sundance at Breitbart has a pair.
So the long game plays on.
Remember: Hillary did not abandon 4 Americans to die in Benghazi. Hillary abandoned 50 Americans to die in Benghazi.
I am trusting that Trump is saying nothing about treason because he is smart. If Hillary, Obama, ValJar, and a number of other people have not been hanged by 2020, I will be disappointed.
Do you remember, Arthur, at so many rallies where he cautioned and informed America that, when it comes to our actual strategic planning, we should not telegraph our intentions?
His "head fake" about not going after Hillary was merely his making sure that she felt that further evasions were unnecessary, and to put her at ease. The fact is, the President has no authority to investigate anybody... although his Atty General most certainly can, and will.
You are wise to trust in Trump's strategic brilliance. These Newsers (rhymes with losers) are still fifteen steps behind Trump, and always will be. See how he used them like tools for the entire campaign? Not an accident.
This guy will (continue to) make us proud. I can feel it.
Bookmark
PFL
Bkmk
When lefties and commentators have what they think is a bright idea, its main value to them is how much applause and chatter it will get them.
As with Reagan, one of Trump’s great assets is that lefties think all who disagree with them are ipso facto stupid. Reagan was an intellectual, and deeply principled. But I think Trump is more brilliant and adaptable. He devours data, and sees connections. His IQ is about 156, maybe higher.
No offense intended but I saw posts like yours on DUmmies about Obama. He was always way ahead of his detractors, playing 3D chess, etc. That is not a place I want to come from.
Trust, but verify.
Meddling in the internal affairs of another nation is an act of war according to our “Great ObamaNation™” and it’s lickspittle progressives.
It will be interesting to see what comes out when those NDAs are rescinded, as I very much hope and expect will happen.
He is a genius with street smarts who doesn't drink, smoke or need much sleep. I'm okay with that.
You know those poor people are desperate to get out of the cages they’ve been put in. They were, for all practical purposes, renditioned.. after they were left to the wolves.
I actually have read that it’s 156.
He throws people off by speaking in partial or garbled sentences. I listened to almost every speech through the entire campaign. I was hearing a guy who was slowly leading the people to accept the truth. He slowly, slowly unveiled truths. By the end of the campaign, he was talking about “globalism,” and such stuff. If he had done that too early, the other Republicans would have been screeching about “conspiracy theories” and “Alex Jones.” As it was, Hillary was the one screeching about “conspiracy theories” and “Alex Jones,” and nobody cared.
Jay sekulow wrote, in depth, about this a couple years ago when we could have stopped Obama. kinda late to the party.. typical dem carrying water for Obama.
Investigate, prosecute!
As always with Oriental and Middle Eastern riddles this story is so full of mysteries that it is hard to know where to begin. However, I think we have three reasons for the Establishment to suddenly wanting to topple Assad (remember that Syria for long periods, despite its dictatorial rule was considered by the same people as a stabilizing influence in the Middle East).
a) The Arab Spring - blue-eyed idealists, and there are many of those in our foreign office departments all over the US and Europe, hoped that all dictatorships in the Middle East would vanish thanks to a few secularized youths armed with iPhones and twitter accounts. Unbelievable? No, quite a few of our "top" diplomats are no more knowledgeable about the world than so. Terrifying, but nevertheless true.
b) The Quatari pipeline - in contrast to the idealistic reason, a very down to earth reason: Money, power and influence. Assad - maybe because of his alliance with Iran - did not approve of a pipeline through Syria. Therefore he must go. Note that people who where for toppling Assad for the first reason also would like to see him go for the much more worldly reason.
c) Stopping the Shi'ite power sphere - the conflict between Sunni and Shi'a in the Middle East also has its mirror image in the CIA and State Department. Those who see Iran and Shi'a as the major threat, and those who see Sunni and the Wahabi terrorism as the major threat. The Iranian power sphere runs from Teheran through Iraq, via Syria to Lebanon and Hezbollah. Getting rid of Assad and his Alawite rule would split the shi'a power sphere in two, and reduce the threat against the Gulf States.
The last point shows just how uncoordinated the Obama foreign policy has been. We have SecState Kerry arguing for military support of ISIS in Syria, and at the same time Kerry is negotiating a total surrender towards Iran regarding the nuclear weapons deal, including enormous wealth transfer to Teheran. Is this just stupidity, or does it show an inner split in the Obama administration? Waiting for further leaks.....
And praying the adults will take over now.
Note that it is not bad at all that stories of McCain is starting to flood all over the Internet now. McCain and his SC side-kick are the two GOP senators that will try to cause trouble during the confirmation hearings with Rex Tillerson. What we see here may be part of that game as well.
What year was this incriminating picture of McCain taken?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.