Hillary Clinton: Trump Could Use IRS To Punish Opponents

RealClearPolitics ^ | July 13, 2016 | RealClearPolitics

[i88schwartz]

At a campaign event in Springfield, Illinois Wednesday afternoon presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton warned Donald Trump would use the military and IRS "to go after his critics and opponents."

[WilliamCooper1]

Wow, wow, wow this is sooooooo RICH!!!!!

[onona]

This statement is full proof that she is a retard.

[DEEP_e]

if she weren’t evil one would have to surmise she had a sense of humor

no shortage of gall here

[b4its2late]

The IRS knows how to do that all by its’ lonesome.

[LucyT]

Hillary's friend and mentor, Alinski:

>>>>""Accuse others of what you are doing, or will do, yourself.""<<<<

Hillary Clinton, who is already the presumed front-runner for President in 2016, has a radical past, and details are only now bubbling to the surface.

Today, The Washington Free Beacon put together an excellent report about new letters between Hillary Clinton and Saul Alinsky, the infamous community organizer who wrote ‘Rules for Radicals.’

That book, which Alinsky dedicated to ‘Lucifer,’ became the handbook for racial agitators and left-wing political problem causers.

(excerpted):

Alinsky's efforts - which were just as evil as they were brilliant - were essential to the growth of the political left, including Marxism - as David Horowitz explains:

[Alinsky was] the practical theorist for progressives who had supported the Communist cause to regroup after the fall of the Berlin Wall and mount a new assault on the capitalist system.

and

It was Alinsky who wove the inchoate relativism of the post-Communist left into a coherent whoe, and helped to form the coalition of communists, anarchists, liberals, Democrats, black racialists, and social justice activists…

Clinton met with Alinsky several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis about his theory of community organizing.

Clinton’s relationship with Alinsky, and her support for his philosophy, continued for several years after she entered Yale law school in 1969, two letters obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.

The letters obtained by the Free Beacon are part of the archives for the Industrial Areas Foundation, a training center for community organizers founded by Alinsky, which are housed at the University of Texas at Austin.

The letters also suggest that Alinsky, who died in 1972, had a deeper influence on Clinton’s early political views than previously known.

A 23-year-old Hillary Clinton was living in Berkeley, California, in the summer of 1971. Hillary was interning at the left-wing law firm Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, known for its radical politics and a client roster that included Black Panthers and other militants.

On July 8, 1971, Clinton reached out to Alinsky, then 62, in a letter sent via airmail, paid for with stamps featuring Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and marked “Personal.”

A copy of those letters are shown at the link:

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/breaking-newly-discovered-letters-hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-marxist-community-organizer/#ixzz4EJX5AhWW>http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/breaking-newly-discovered-letters-hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-marxist-community-organizer/#ixzz4EJX5AhWW

[pfflier]

She knows that from experience. Next thing you know she will worry the FBI can be politicized.

[tflabo]

I’m speechless....the lying hypocrite speaks.

[LS]

Why would you ever think that Cankles? Isn’t the IRS fair and above reproach?

[tflabo]

30 traits of the Jezebel spirit..

https://truthinreality.com/2012/09/24/30-consistent-traits-of-the-jezebel-spirit/

[navymom1]

Pot meet kettle.

[Rusty0604]

I watched her speech and it was so bad Karl Rove was defending Trump afterwards.

[FroggyTheGremlim]

"Projection"

Accuse your opponent of what you are doing yourself.

[amnestynone]

trump might do it but Clinton definitely would.

[rottndog]

Classic Alinski style projection.

[doug from upland]

Trump should immediately come back with his administration being COMPLETELY transparent. No one from the IRS in his administration will come before Congress and plead the 5th. If they do, they will immediately be fired.

[AC86UT89]

just like Obama?

[Coffee_drinker]

Hillary Tee’s them up, and Trump hits the home run. I can’t wait for him to respond to this one!!! LOL

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Trump should just respond by saying “if she is elected, Hillary could give or sell top secret information to our enemies, resulting in the deaths of our personnel located overseas, or, she could sell that information to people who will pay her or her husband for it. We know this BECAUSE SHE ALREADY DID IT, and the DOJ has already given her a pass for this activity”.

[UCANSEE2]

ya mean like Obama and Lerner did??

Did she not do the same thing when she was co-president ?

[Amendment10]

The only reason that the IRS can be used to punish citizens is because low-information citizens, rich and poor, are probably not being taught the following about the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers and associated limited power to appropriate taxes, and consequently cannot protect their wallets.

From related threads ...

The Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, evidently a good place to hide these clauses from Congress, to clarify that all federal legislative / regulatory powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, and not in faceless, non-elected bureaucrats such as those running the constitutionally undefined EPA and IRS as examples.

So Congress has a constitutional “monopoly" on federal legislative powers whether it wants it or not. But by unconstitutionally delegating such powers to non-elected bureaucrats, Congress is wrongly protecting such powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of Sections 1-3 mentioned above.

Note that by allowing bureaucrats outside the legislative branch steal and exercise Congress’s power to appropriate taxes that lawmakers are able to keep their voting records clean. And by keeping their voting records clean, corrupt lawmakers are able to fool low-information patriots into reelecting them.

Also, patriots who might have missed the following note about the annual federal budget, as the Founding States had probably meant for it to be understood, will probably find it disturbing.

Regarding $4 trillion and projected $5 trillion dollar annual federal budgets, note that a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress is prohibited from appropriating taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. This is evidenced by the excerpt below.

”Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

In fact, based on the Court’s statement above, here is a rough approximation of how much taxpayers should be paying Congress annually to perform its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited power duties.

Given that the plurality of clauses in Section 8 deal with defense, and given that the Department of Defense budget for 2015 was $500+ billion, I will generously round up the $500+ billion figure to $1 trillion (but probably much less) as the annual price tag of the federal government to the taxpayers.

In other words, the corrupt media, including Obama guard dog Fx Noise, should not be reporting multi-trillion dollar annual federal budgets without mentioning the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to appropriate taxes in budget discussions.

Also, noting that I will gladly vote for constitutionally low-information Trump, Trump will undoubtedly be surprised when Constitution-savvy patriots inform Trump that he and his rich friends have probably been paying more taxes than corrupt Congress is constitutionally authorized to appropriate.

Remember in November !

Patriots need to support Trump by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes and federal interference in state affairs as evidenced by IRS and Congress stealing dollars from citizens' wallets.

Also consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.