Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC Mayor de Blasio forces bars to serve pregnant women
Washington Times ^ | May 9, 2016 | Bradford Richardson

Posted on 05/09/2016 12:35:39 PM PDT by rickmichaels

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s Human Rights Commission released Friday new guidelines forcing bartenders in the city to serve pregnant mothers alcohol.

The guidelines say discriminatory “stereotypes” about what is in the best interest of the health of the “fetus” are impermissible by law.

“Judgments and stereotypes about how pregnant individuals should behave, their physical capabilities and what is or is not healthy for a fetus are pervasive in our society and cannot be used as a pretext for unlawful discriminatory decisions in employment, housing, and public accommodations,” the guidelines state.

The new guidelines were issued to clarify the New York City Human Rights Law, which bars discrimination “on the basis of pregnancy or perceived pregnancy,” according to the guidelines.

The guidelines provide examples of actions that constitute discrimination toward the pregnant, one of which is “a restaurant policy that prohibits staff from serving pregnant individuals raw fish or alcohol.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: New York
KEYWORDS: alcohol; deblasio; newyork; nyc; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: humblegunner
My mom drank and smoked and I turned out to be humanity’s greatest hope.

At least when it comes to tirelessly seeking and destroying blog pimps.

41 posted on 05/09/2016 1:00:36 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
First of all, what does the city care if a restaurant is looking out for the welfare of its customers?

More likely the welfare of the bar to avoid the inevitable "fetal alcohol syndrome" lawsuit. Hope there is a "hold harmless" clause to that order.

42 posted on 05/09/2016 1:02:01 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("He's a winner in the process of winning. People like that." Scott Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage
I have always thought it overboard to ban all drinking in pregnant mothers. A beer, or a margarita or a glass of wine or two is fine as far as I am concerned.

So have I. And I think doctors would probably agree. But as with everything else they do, their decisions are motivated by the fear of a lawsuit.

I can just see stupid women whose doctor says a drink is okay overdoing it, winding up with a fetal alcohol baby and then suing the doctor because after all he said she could drink.

43 posted on 05/09/2016 1:02:22 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

First of all, restaurants are not interested in anybody’s health. They are simply liability averse.

Second — I think it’s OK to feed booze into pregnant women. Short of regular alcoholic binges, there is nothing harmful about a pregnant woman having an evening cocktail or a glass of wine with dinner. I really have no patience with the nannying and shame-mongering of prohibitionists.

And before anyone objects that no doctor will name a guaranteed safe level of alcohol consumption for pregnant women, consider that no doctor will name a guaranteed safe level of anything.


44 posted on 05/09/2016 1:02:31 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

No. de Blasio is actually more stupid than even this.


45 posted on 05/09/2016 1:02:58 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
At least when it comes to tirelessly seeking and destroying blog pimps.

Somebody has to do it.

It takes time but can be fun and sometimes is rewarding.

Just like any other worthwhile endeavor.

46 posted on 05/09/2016 1:04:12 PM PDT by humblegunner (NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Wow

I agree with Commie Mayor for once

It’s the woman’s decision not the effing government


47 posted on 05/09/2016 1:06:01 PM PDT by wardaddy (ill buy the bodybags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

Safe level of alcohol? That’s easy.

None.


48 posted on 05/09/2016 1:06:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

My husband makes enough for us to live on, my waitressing and barttending are for fun. I know she would still get alcohol somewhere, but I won’t be the one to assist her in hurting her child. I’ve seen FAS up close and personal and it’s quite sad-his birth family (aunts, uncles, and a sibling) are all professionals who do quite well. His brain is forever damaged by his mother’s drinking.


49 posted on 05/09/2016 1:07:27 PM PDT by NorthstarMom (God says debt is a curse and children are a blessing, yet we apply for loans and prevent pregnancy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

My wife smoked Marlboros and drank Fosters or PBR

And some Pinots too

Southern style folded egg nog flavored with Dickel

Look on my homepage

They and mom did great


50 posted on 05/09/2016 1:08:40 PM PDT by wardaddy (ill buy the bodybags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NorthstarMom
My husband makes enough for us to live on, my waitressing and barttending are for fun.

Probably a good thing for you that you need not rely on yourself for a living.

It affords you the luxury of giving up your job for something that makes no difference.

Three cheers and a Tiger for you.

51 posted on 05/09/2016 1:11:30 PM PDT by humblegunner (NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Can’t serve them a Big Gulp, though!


52 posted on 05/09/2016 1:14:32 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

The guidelines say discriminatory “stereotypes” about what is in the best interest of the health of the “fetus” are impermissible by law.


53 posted on 05/09/2016 1:14:54 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Excellent comment.


54 posted on 05/09/2016 1:15:37 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NorthstarMom

How much did she drink?

Did the child have the noticeable symptom of fetal alcohol syndrome:
a smooth ridge between the upper lip and nose


55 posted on 05/09/2016 1:16:19 PM PDT by FR_addict (Ryan needs to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jumpingcholla34

No, that would be communism. Just micro-managing private business is called fascism, and everyone knows fascism is far better than communism.


56 posted on 05/09/2016 1:19:16 PM PDT by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bryan999
< So what’s stopping them form serving kids? Some antiquated, judgmental law that says kids are too young to drink?

Oh that's coming as soon as the pedophiles can get the public used to seeing them running around with kids after their scouting trips.

57 posted on 05/09/2016 1:20:35 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I’m right there with you. It’s stunning how warped the liberal mind is.


58 posted on 05/09/2016 1:21:03 PM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Yep-diagnosed by a psychiatrist at Mayo Clinic.


59 posted on 05/09/2016 1:22:07 PM PDT by NorthstarMom (God says debt is a curse and children are a blessing, yet we apply for loans and prevent pregnancy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
My mom drank and smoked and I turned out to be humanity’s greatest hope.

That, along with your spirited moniker, is funny. I don't care who you are, that's funny.

60 posted on 05/09/2016 1:25:09 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson