Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC Mayor de Blasio forces bars to serve pregnant women
Washington Times ^ | May 9, 2016 | Bradford Richardson

Posted on 05/09/2016 12:35:39 PM PDT by rickmichaels

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s Human Rights Commission released Friday new guidelines forcing bartenders in the city to serve pregnant mothers alcohol.

The guidelines say discriminatory “stereotypes” about what is in the best interest of the health of the “fetus” are impermissible by law.

“Judgments and stereotypes about how pregnant individuals should behave, their physical capabilities and what is or is not healthy for a fetus are pervasive in our society and cannot be used as a pretext for unlawful discriminatory decisions in employment, housing, and public accommodations,” the guidelines state.

The new guidelines were issued to clarify the New York City Human Rights Law, which bars discrimination “on the basis of pregnancy or perceived pregnancy,” according to the guidelines.

The guidelines provide examples of actions that constitute discrimination toward the pregnant, one of which is “a restaurant policy that prohibits staff from serving pregnant individuals raw fish or alcohol.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: New York
KEYWORDS: alcohol; deblasio; newyork; nyc; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: rickmichaels

Feh.
My mom drank and smoked and I turned out to be humanity’s greatest hope.


21 posted on 05/09/2016 12:46:26 PM PDT by humblegunner (NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

My adopted brother has fetal alcohol syndrome. If true, this is perverse and appalling. I would lose my job rather than serve a pregnant woman.


22 posted on 05/09/2016 12:46:29 PM PDT by NorthstarMom (God says debt is a curse and children are a blessing, yet we apply for loans and prevent pregnancy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels
The AMA is going to go ballistic on this one.

So should NOW but I won't hold my breath.

23 posted on 05/09/2016 12:47:22 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

What, you think the bar is private property or something?

What silly old 20th Century notions, this is Obamerica!


24 posted on 05/09/2016 12:47:57 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
But don’t order a soft drink of more than 12 oz..

And for God's sake, don't let them use e-cigarettes. Chuck Schumer told us this weekend that there have been 4 (OMG!) cases of e-cigs "exploding." Gotta get the FDA involved, of course....

25 posted on 05/09/2016 12:49:07 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

How do you stereotype pregnant????? Either you is or you ain’t . . . I am tired of the inmates running the asylum


26 posted on 05/09/2016 12:49:58 PM PDT by RatRipper (The biggest threat to US national security is our government and those in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Satire?


27 posted on 05/09/2016 12:50:04 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Why can’t a private business decide these things for itself? It’s getting to the point that the government might as well nationalize all businesses and put their owners and employees on the public payroll.


28 posted on 05/09/2016 12:51:08 PM PDT by jumpingcholla34 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthstarMom
I would lose my job rather than serve a pregnant woman.

Then you would be eating cold ramen in a ditch, and the pregnant woman would still get served.

Not much win for you there.

29 posted on 05/09/2016 12:51:09 PM PDT by humblegunner (NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels; SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; ...

Nanny State PING!


30 posted on 05/09/2016 12:52:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Because he is soon concerned for the children


31 posted on 05/09/2016 12:52:52 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Are you my son?


32 posted on 05/09/2016 12:52:55 PM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

“I always thought that bars could refuse service to ANYONE.”

So could pizzarias and bakeries, until recently.


33 posted on 05/09/2016 12:53:26 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

I thought this HAD to be April Fool’s Day. Then realized it was May 9th.


34 posted on 05/09/2016 12:53:57 PM PDT by supremedoctrine ("If you want to be able to predict the future, first you have to create it"---Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hurricane Andrew

Why couldn’t De Blasio clarify that forcing people to drive with their seatbelts on is a form of discrimination against people who don’t like seatbelts and is therefore forbidden?


35 posted on 05/09/2016 12:54:45 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Good point! The baby might want a Shirley Temple, and the “Mom” might want a Cosmopolitan , a la Sex and the City.


36 posted on 05/09/2016 12:56:10 PM PDT by supremedoctrine ("If you want to be able to predict the future, first you have to create it"---Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage
I have always thought it overboard to ban all drinking in pregnant mothers.

Are you suggesting that a fetus should be able to consume alcohol before they are even born?!!! Why, I never.....

37 posted on 05/09/2016 12:57:31 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mware
So should NOW but I won't hold my breath.

NOW would just remind pregnant drinkers that they can always abort.

38 posted on 05/09/2016 12:57:35 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47
Are you my son?

I doubt it, I talked to mom about an hour ago and this didn't really come up.

39 posted on 05/09/2016 12:58:38 PM PDT by humblegunner (NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

New York values!


40 posted on 05/09/2016 12:58:57 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson