Wilder with wife Kriztina. Blue in Netherlands politics means different than here.
Posted on 05/07/2016 11:25:20 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Anti-Islamist politician Geert Wilders will fly to Cleveland convention to support Donald Trump.
Geert will be in Cleveland.
The Trump campaign plans on “juicing up” this year’s convention.
Bloomberg spoke with Trump senior advisor Barry Bennett on Friday.
“Our team will be headed out [to Cleveland] next week or the week after to get our first kind of update of what’s going on. But I think when it comes to the program a lot of us feel that we could juice up the format just a little,” Bennett told Masters in Politics. “More entertaining, more interesting. I don’t know why the candidate only speaks on acceptance night, why shouldn’t he speak every night from a different city? How come we are not doing broadcasts on Facebook or Google, why are we just relying on 45 minutes of network television time.”
It could
I heard it from a caller on the Herman Cain show so I stole it
Disagree. This is, plainly, going to be a national security election, with both illegal immigration and Islamofascism as its driving issues. Trunp's certain candidacy is, demonstrably, because of this; while, on the other side of the aisle, Cankles is routinely thumping Sanders, re: his own lack of national security credentials.
Anyone sap or mug enough to nonsensically froth over Wilder's mere presence at a public event were never going to vote for him to begin with. Period, end of.
lulz. As if the last year of anti-Trump media coverage wasn't enough to satisfy your need to destroy Trump.
In order for Trump to win it all, he is going to have to attract a more diverse set of voters than those who vote in Republican primaries.
A 2nd consecutive paragraph that indicates you haven't been paying attention to what's been happening.
Ten bucks says that President Black Muslim Christian Pastor Imam Hussein Obama will try to block Geert Wilders from entering the country
Your all or nothing thinking is what dooms a lot of conservatives.
There is NO chance I will be voting for Hillary. If I end up voting for Trump, it will mostly be a vote AGAINST Hillary.
Trump wil need to attract more and different kinds of votes to win in the general election. That would include people like me.
Now you and your distribution list of freepers can continue your insular chatter to exclude everyone that doesn’t meet your self-determined criteria for who qualifies as a true conservative. That kind of swarming tactic is what chased most of the really good posters away from FR years ago.
I haven’t been reading the scintillating commentary on FR recently, that’s for sure.
I haven’t been reading the scintillating commentary on FR recently, that’s for sure.
Too many cracked (and unsupported) assertions jam-packed into that hostile huff to bother with... so: I won't, then.
Breathe into a paper bag, or something.
Hmm.
You're an infrequent poster, returning just in time to say negative things about Trump as he ascends to the nomination.
You may need a scintilla of a clue about how you may appear to regular FReepers.
Paid shill may be the most popular view.
You responded to my comment and added a list of other posters to the response, the purpose of which was to invite each one of them to agree with you, and to question my motive and my conservative bona fides.
I call that swarming. As for breathing in a paper bag, more ad hominem.
You cannot possibly "hear" what you're sounding like, right now.
If you feel you're being flamed or trolled, send a copy of the post(s) in question to Jim Robinson or Admin Moderator, by all means. Otherwise, you're simply caterwauling, for whatever reason(s) behind my control.
As for breathing in a paper bag, more ad hominem.
Incidentally, that's a misuse of the term "ad hominem." And, no, pointing that out is not, in and of itself, ad hominem.
That’s wonderful! We MUST support Donald-voice of WeThe People! Let’s make this the biggest Republican voter turn out in history!!!
“Paid shill may be the most popular view.”
That’s the cost for not being able to screen people that post here. He’s OBVIOUSLY showing the signs of someone that is part of someone’s ‘social media outreach’ effort - trying to skirt the line between demeaning Trump without being zotted. He’s probably ok now...but most of these types end up giving themselves away and then have to find a new place to post their garbage.
Not a paid shill, not zotted, and not a he.
Exactly!
YOU GO Geert!
Certainly no scintillating (or even coherent) commentary will ever be found if it relies upon you to be written.
The GOP would be wise to take heed of Wilders’ warnings.
When has the GOP ever been wise?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.