Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(From July 20, 2005) Cruz OpEd: John Roberts Should Be A Quick Confirm
nationalreview.com ^ | July 20 2005

Posted on 02/14/2016 5:18:34 AM PST by Helicondelta

This week, the president announced his intention to nominate John Roberts to be a Supreme Court justice.

His nomination has been met with widespread praise, from left and right. Nevertheless, there are some who have raised complaints that his two years on the bench provide insufficient record for them to assess (and attack) his jurisprudence.

That complaint misses the mark for three reasons.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 2016election; antoninscalia; cruz; election2016; johnroberts; paidtrumptroll; roberts; scalia; scotus; tedcruz; texas; tinfoilhattrump; trumpwasright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: DJ MacWoW

The point is that he was on Dubya’s radar, dubya being from Texas and all.


81 posted on 02/14/2016 8:22:11 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No. That wasn’t the point of posting this.


82 posted on 02/14/2016 8:30:36 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Why do you think National Review posted it?


83 posted on 02/14/2016 8:33:20 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I wasn't talking about what National Review did in 2005.

You have a lovely Sunday. My Grandkids want lunch.

84 posted on 02/14/2016 8:41:16 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

???

Then I missed something someplace. Seriously.

Help me figure out what you are saying.


85 posted on 02/14/2016 8:52:37 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger; palmer
...virtually every freeper replying to that was saying that she was wrong, that Roberts was a great pick.

Lol...not even close.

However, it is interesting to see who his biggest advocates were back then and what their reasoning was.

86 posted on 02/14/2016 8:55:44 AM PST by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Ted Cruz just went through one lie after another about Donald Trump on ABC. He said the ONLY person Trump has recommended for the court is his sister…out and out LIE. Last night, during the debate, standing next to Cruz, Trump named two good conservative judges, Judge Diane S. Sykes and Judge Bill Pryor.

Cruz has a problem with the truth.


87 posted on 02/14/2016 9:14:34 AM PST by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
A noobie Trump supporter searches for and posts an opinion article from 2005 that most FReepers agreed on even if they didn't see it back then.

Try posting something Trump said 6 or even 8 months ago.

Donald Trump on Kentucky clerk: Same-sex marriage the "law of the land" September 7, 2015.

"You have to go with it. The decision's been made, and that is the law of the land,"

I really have to go.

88 posted on 02/14/2016 9:22:46 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

Yes, I remember it well. Everyone thought Roberts was a good choice at the time. And I also remember folks shouting “Rubio for POTUS!” shortly after he came onto the scene. People have short memories!


89 posted on 02/14/2016 9:37:57 AM PST by MaggiesPitchfork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MaggiesPitchfork

People want to think the best and get carried away, only to swing back hard the other way when disappointed. There were a few red flags with Roberts but to be honest, there was a lot that appeared favorable at the time as well. Rubio, well, he seemed to have turned on his constituency in record time, I don’t think there were many here cheering him for President, not for long.


90 posted on 02/14/2016 9:40:56 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
When the pick was announced, everyone here at FR, gave it thumbs up. No one thought Roberts would become a turncoat that he is, so your little hit piece on Cruz is BS.

Yes but WE didn't know about Robert's work in helping gay activists win at the SCOTUS. Cruz -- who CLERKED with Roberts for Rehnquist, surely did know all about it.

91 posted on 02/14/2016 9:26:11 PM PST by montag813 (NO MORE BUSHES (or Clintons) EVER...Put it in the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Half the country already thinks she *is* on the Supreme Court. So hey, why not?

Judge Judy would be more conservative than either Roberts or Kennedy.

92 posted on 02/14/2016 9:28:40 PM PST by montag813 (NO MORE BUSHES (or Clintons) EVER...Put it in the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson