Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Hilariously Claims She Didn’t Ask for Classified Info to be Sent Over a Non Secure System
redstate.com ^ | 1/8/16 | Leon H. Wolf

Posted on 01/08/2016 7:24:00 PM PST by doldrumsforgop

You really have to hand it to the Clintons. If nothing else, they are some of the ballsiest liars on the face of the earth. If Billy Mays were resurrected from the dead and asked to pitch the latest thing Hillary Clinton is selling, he would no doubt respond, “Sorry, I have my professional reputation to think about.” The facts, of course, are that State Department was forced, virtually at gunpoint, to turn over an email in which Hillary Clinton is discussing getting some classified talking points from one of her underlings. The secure fax on which they were supposed to be sent apparently was experiencing problems, so Hillary said, verbatim, “turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” This is not my interpretation of what she said, these are her exact words, which you can see with your own eyes here.

This particular email is so damaging to the narrative that Hillary has been trying to spin that she was forced to sally forth and offer an explanation to the press. Her explanation? Never happened.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; benghazi; clinton; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; jacobsullivan; jakesullivan; newyork; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Won't be funny when she is locked up with others.

bet she is doing her level best right now groveling to Obama so she can get a pardon while he is still on the job.

She has 377 days to get her conviction in time to make it happen.

This is one time for her to beg instead of laugh it off, and to expedite things.

1 posted on 01/08/2016 7:24:00 PM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

She probably figures she can just pardon herself once she’s been sworn in. I think the MSM figures that should be fine too.


2 posted on 01/08/2016 7:26:24 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

Cackle Cackle Cankles and clovens I am above the Innocents. Avert Your Gaze...


3 posted on 01/08/2016 7:32:02 PM PST by Shady (We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

I think more likely someone below her will go to jail for her so she will pardon the person when she’s elected president


4 posted on 01/08/2016 7:32:26 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop
"w no identifying heading"

Two possibilities: classified document illegally redacted. Or unclassified document with no need to redact an "identifying heading".

5 posted on 01/08/2016 7:33:27 PM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

Tell it to the jury.


6 posted on 01/08/2016 7:34:39 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

She didn’t ask, she actually told people to send it to her nonsecure;

https://www.foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_Jan7thWeb/08635C6-8/DOC_0C05787519/C05787519.pdf


7 posted on 01/08/2016 7:35:34 PM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

Huma, Sullivan, Mills, talk about the staff that couldn’t shoot straight. What did they have two years to clean out the incriminating emails? Can you imagine what they did deep six? Obama will make it all well for no other reason than to bail out the black chick (mills)


8 posted on 01/08/2016 7:37:27 PM PST by DAC21 (.z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

I am of the opinion that not even Democrats will vote for a candidate under indictment, or even one referred for indictment, the only reason being that it “it looks bad”.


9 posted on 01/08/2016 7:40:39 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
I think in the next month or so the Justice Department will announce that "no laws were broken" and then Hillary will be able to say "Those nasty Republicans have hounded me and even with all that scrutiny I was found to be totally honorable".

It's all in the timing... Obama has no choice but to bail her out of this one.

10 posted on 01/08/2016 7:44:06 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Hopefully, she will be indicted before it is too late for the USA. However, I have yet to talk to anyone who doesn’t think she is criminal. Some surprising people too.


11 posted on 01/08/2016 7:45:55 PM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop
At this point, I kind of expect Bill Clinton to run for president. People will say, "Bill, you can't do that! You had two terms and that's the maximum! You're done!"

And Bill will just say, "What are you talking about? I was never president. But I'm running in 2016, and you should vote for me."

And the media will probably say, "Okay. Will do."

I mean -- they think they can get away with anything, right?

12 posted on 01/08/2016 7:47:00 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

Question: Well, Hillary is it classified or is it unclassified?

Answer: Well, that depends on what your definition of is, is, and what difference, at this point, does it make?


13 posted on 01/08/2016 7:49:24 PM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Heh. And any legal challenge will be met with "no standing," Congress will count the electoral votes, and the CJ of SCOTUS will swear him in.

It all depends on what the meaning of "two" is.

14 posted on 01/08/2016 7:50:52 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

First in to say they recruit Biden.

He will say that he believe Bo is calling to him from the grave to run.

He will recruit fauxcahontas for his running mate.

Winning.


15 posted on 01/08/2016 7:52:55 PM PST by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

my take on this is...

the FBI wants a prosecution.
Obama goes along with the FBI, or doesn’t.

will be the biggest decision he makes of his 2nd term


16 posted on 01/08/2016 7:54:35 PM PST by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Famous last words:

I am of the opinion that not even Democrats will vote for a pot smoking, draft dodging hillbilly from Arkansas.

I am of the opinion that not even Democrats will vote for a homosexual Kenyan Muslim.

I am of the opinion that not even Democrats will vote for a candidate under indictment.


17 posted on 01/08/2016 7:56:48 PM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RockyTx

Maybe he learned that the Clinton machine WILL come after him, if he ‘permits’ the FBI to have his ‘blessing’ to prosecute Hillary.

That would make him cry.

I wouldn’t want to have popcorn. 0bama and the Clintons have bred perversion and pure sleaze into this country, and have suckered us as though we are idiots. I would want something very different. Very different.


18 posted on 01/08/2016 8:00:18 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

I am of the opinion that not even Democrats will vote for a vehicular homicide candidate that leaves the scene of an accident.


19 posted on 01/08/2016 8:08:34 PM PST by C210N (Supporting the Constitutional Conservative in the race. Constitutional Conservative Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

Well since people obviously knew better when they elected lesser evils who have NEVER IN HISTORY done anything but grovel to the clintons, I guess there will be silence on the issue from the right. Because if people on the right cared about such trivialities, they’d have elected principled people.


20 posted on 01/08/2016 8:11:14 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson