Posted on 11/20/2015 2:54:15 PM PST by Albion Wilde
Full title: Trump says Hillary is a criminal 'walking on eggs' trying not to offend Obama with tough terror talk: 'If she angers the president she's going to get indicted'
Donald Trump laid into Hillary Clinton during a campaign appearance in Spartanburg, South Carolina...
Trump said the Democratic Party establishment has rallied around Clinton and has a vested interest in helping her steer clear of legal jeopardy related to her classified email scandal.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
LOL....I see Trump has gotten under their skin. I am getting a kick out of watching the TDSers have their meltdowns about a GOP frontrunner - a historic frontrunner, at that - leading so far ahead, and for so long, right here on FR.
Trump’s got them all in a tizzy.
He’ll build the biggest, most beautiful, most everything wall eva...
You can take that to the Trump Plaza.
LOL! It took him over 25 years of Hillary in the spotlight for him to figure out she was a bad player. What a joke. I don't think he's that stupid.
He knew what she was - a player, like him, in the game. Trump was more of a purchaser in the sale of government back then. Now, he claims he'll clean things up if we put him behind the counter. I'm skeptical.
Yes! Thank you! Let’s Make America Great Again!!
Thanks I will and thanks for adding me to your ping list!
I posted this elsewhere, but I think it deserves a copy/paste here.
Since I have at least a partial background in economics, here’s how I’ve been determining my support for a candidate: in this equation.
A = EC
Where A is ‘agenda.’ Specifically, how much of a conservative agenda a candidate would be able to implement. It’s not a percentage measure; it only serves as comparison.
E is ‘energy.’ This is a measure of how much ability the candidate would have to ensure that his platform is adopted. This includes things like popular support, financial standing, ties to donors (or lack thereof) and most of all a willingness to bust heads in Washington and not just play get along.
C is ‘conservatism.’ Simply enough, how conservative the candidate’s positions are, and how much I trust that they will keep those positions once they’re in Washington.
I imagine that the values of e and c could be adjusted depending on how important one issue or the other is during an election. In 2016, border security and terrorism are very important issues, so C would be weighted in their favor, at least in my case.
I support Trump because my best estimate is E=.8 and C=.5, so A=.4. (Again, this is not percentage of the agenda, but just a matter of comparing candidates) Cruz, I think, would be E=.4 and C=.9 for A=.36. A good candidate for views, but he doesn’t have as much power, support, oomph, or sheer skull-breaking cussedness to get his agenda past the dopes, whores, and frauds in DC.
Therefore, of the two, Trump is the better of two good candidates in this election cycle. Both are good, but I think that Trump is the greater good. Not because he’s more conservative, but because he’ll have the clout and gumption to implement more conservatism than Cruz would be able to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh8kaXXv35c&app=desktop...Trump Ad? For everyone’s enjoyment. Patriotic too. (No Virus, promise).
Not because he’s more conservative, but because he’ll have the clout and gumption to implement more conservatism than Cruz would be able to.
this part doesn’t make sense to me.
If Trump isn’t more Conservative then why would he implement more Conservativism???
You’re putting an a lot of trust in a guy who’s new to the Right. Good luck with that.
Who’s your candidate?
Cruz
Good; I like Cruz too.
Now if you’d be so kind, tell me how he’s going to be able to win without selling his political soul for big donations and establishment support, and tell me how he’ll be able to get a conservative agenda passed if he should get into office.
See, I’m confident that Trump CAN do what he says he’s going to do, and won’t have to sell out to get elected. I’m not so sure that Cruz can win at this point in time, in this political climate, without selling out.
And finally, it is absolutely VITAL that the leftists are NOT allowed to import all their illegal voters, and this is a problem that has to be taken care of NOW, if not sooner. If the wall is built, everything else can wait 4 years. If the wall isn’t built, then we lose. Even if everything else is implemented in the first term, we lose because of the fraudulent votes that will get imported.
And from all that I can see, Trump is the only one in the race who A: Can tell the donor class to GTFO, and B: Has the will and will have the political capital to bust heads in DC to make it happen.
And if he’s lying, then we were doomed from the start, so it doesn’t matter if I supported him or not. But I’d rather support someone who can but might be lying about doing the right thing, rather than someone who I know can’t or won’t.
And yes I do trust Trump to do what he says, at least in regards to the wall. And here’s why.
The establishment hates Donald Trump with a passion. The masks have come off and they’re doing everything they can to tear him down, and the biggest reason is because of the wall.
Don’t you think that if he really was lying through his teeth about the wall and the illegals, he’d have had a little pow-wow with the Establishment leaders and assured them that he was really on their side and eager to screw the rest of us just like them? It would sure remove a big obstacle in his presidential ambitions, wouldn’t it?
Instead, the leftists in the establishment are popping blood vessels in their brains over him. THEY sure think that he’s going to do what he says.
Will it not always be so?
The One Perfect Man hasn't been on the scene for almost 2,000 years now.
I suppose we could have the lesser of 3 evils if a third party with any following arises...
After hearing from Jonah; the cry was...
Will America?
|
Didn't you people learn ANYTHING from the smoke of SODOM?
-- GOD |
Simple; yet Profound.
True; but...
We're putting an a lot of trust in a guy who's NOTnew to speaking and DOING whatever he puts his mind to!
Hoosier candidate?
We’ve had a lot of them go to Washington.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.