Posted on 09/04/2015 8:22:48 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
Hillary Rodham Clinton and her family personally paid a State Department staffer to maintain the private e-mail server she used while heading the agency, according to an official from Clintons presidential campaign.
The unusual arrangement helped Clinton retain personal control over the system that she used for her public and private duties and that has emerged as an issue for her campaign. But, according to the campaign official, it also ensured that taxpayer dollars were not spent on a private server that was shared by Clinton, her husband and their daughter as well as aides to the former president.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Don’t forget if this was a government IT pro he/she must have known secret/confidential government protocol and purposely set up a sever to bypass it.
Door Number 3:
Is this the latest way a Clinton employee figured out how to get multiple paychecks for working different jobs simultaneously? Just when you thought Democrap leeches couldn’t figure out a new way to game the system.
Some basic questions the press should ask:
- Why did we learn about Mr. Pagliano so late in this discussion?
- Was the Dept of State aware of Mr. Pagliano’s activities?
- Why did Mr. Pagliano hide his income from this job?
- What are Mr. Pagliano’s qualifications for this job?
- What is Mr. Pagliano’s security clearance level?
- Why did you not provide a W2 or 1099 for Mr. Pagliano?
- Please show us the cancelled checks or transfer notices for the payments to Mr. Pagliano?
- How did Mr. Pagliano interface with the private firm managing the server?
...And so on. The questions write themselves.
Can't happen. Unclassified PCs and servers are connected to different networks. Say for instance that even if he did, it would be illegal. I don't think a government IT pro would even contemplate trying a around, no matter how much his criminal boss tried to pay him.
Exactly. If Bill Clinton took a tax deduction for donating his used underwear, there is no way they paid for this personally. This was paid for by the Clinton Foundation. Somebody subpoena the paychecks.
You seem to know about government IT stuff so I’ll ask
Back during the Bengazi affair I seem to remember Hillary using the word “cable”. that would be an archaic term for a telex or similar message that somehow made it into the age of the email. in my mind, the telex was replaced by the fax that was pretty much replaced by e mail.
one wonders if cables in the form of coded telex messages still exist in the State Department for very sensitive correspondence or if routine highly classified e mails are encrypted.
my thought is that Hillary just couldn’t be bothered with routine encryption and bypassed it and eventually may have just disregarded encryption at all.
A cable, I think is still being used in State adept terms, as “official” correspondence through official chAnnels. There used to be a system in DOD for messages just like in DOS, but now a days I think it is all email, just through official email addresses. By the way, a “cable” would also be written clearly and consisly, for formal than a standard email.
The alternative media needs to be all over this story.
Yep, I’ve been saying it for a long while now that Michelle would be the Dem nominee. The only question is would Barack allow her to upstage him? He won’t be getting all the glory anymore.
She's 200:1 on the Euro wagering sites.
If you really believe that, head on over and lay down some dough, those are awesome odds, almost like free money.
(demise of the dem/lib party much?)
Nah. 45% of the “journo lists” now identify themselves as “independents” (ie, communists and socialists) already.
Another 40% proudly DO identify themselves as democrats.
There are, as I recall, only 6% that claim even (luke-warm establishment liberal) republican (GROPe) voters like George Will.
If the Clinton Foundation paid this idiot, it opens the door to a forensic audit of that suspect enterprise.
Oh please Oh please Oh please Oh please.
Yeah, as frightening as it is, I just don't see it. She's even less qualified than him (or Faux-cahontas). And even less likable she's brittle and shrill; she makes Hillary look cuddly.
I meant setting up Hillary’s stand alone system to bypass security directives not internal server protocols.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.