Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Republicans Can Win Back Conservatives - Passing the emotional purity test
Front Page ^ | August 26, 2015 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 08/26/2015 11:13:50 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

The GOP is panicking. And it should be.

Conservatives are sending an angry unambiguous message to the party. The message can be read not only in the rise of Donald Trump, but also in the rise of Ben Carson. Republican voters are choosing candidates who don’t talk or seem like politicians. They have lost all faith in the Republican Party.

And it’s hard to blame them.

Conservatives poured time, energy and money into a party that promised to counter Obama and take back America. The GOP controls both houses of Congress and conservatives have nothing to show for it.

Support for Trump and Carson really isn’t about the issues. Attacking them for their past liberal positions is a waste of time. This isn’t about what Trump or Carson believe. It’s about what the base believes.

There has been a profound loss of faith in the Republican Party and the larger political establishment orbiting around it. Faced with a bewildering number of candidates, convoluted flip-flopping on the issues (trying to track the immigration positions of most GOP candidates alone requires a flowchart), a great many Republicans are opting out of politics by trying something else.

Trump and Carson have diametrically opposite personalities, but what they bring to the table is a completely different attitude. Their biggest appeal is that they aren’t politicians.

How do you run against that?

Trump’s biggest draw is the fight. Republican voters want a man who won’t pull his punches, won’t back down at the last minute and won’t walk out of the room with his head down and promise to try harder next time. They’ve had too much of that already and they’re sick to death of it.

That was what Ted Cruz understood with the shutdown. It didn’t matter whether it would succeed or fail. Sometimes an army needs to attack to keep up its morale. It can’t wait endlessly or it will fall apart. Cruz understood that Congress could not conduct business as usual while the voters would wait around patiently for them to act. It’s a truth that few of his Senate colleagues were willing to listen to.

This is a truth that many in the establishment busy strategizing indefinite endgames have forgotten. Their concept of victory is fundamentally different than that of the base. Trump is the reckoning. He is the base’s payback for the breach of trust. His poll numbers show the lack of faith in the GOP.

It isn’t necessary to take a specific position on birthright citizenship to compete with him. There’s no real point in taking a political position that much of the base no longer pays attention to because it doesn’t believe that the politicians taking those positions will stick to them once they are elected.

We’re not dealing with think tank checklists here. What voters want is someone with the right attitude, not the right ideology. They’re willing to overlook Trump’s past positions, his flip-flops now, because he has an uncompromising attitude. This is not an ideological purity test; it’s an emotional purity test.

Trying to show them that Trump doesn’t pass an ideological purity test is pointless. Instead Republican candidates have to pass an emotional purity test. They have to show that they’re willing to fight as hard as it takes with nothing held back. They have to stop being politically cautious and get angry.

Because their base is mad as hell.

As David Horowitz wrote in Go for the Heart, "'Caring'” is not one among many issues in an election. It is the central one. Since most policy issues are complicated, voters want to know above everything else just whom they can trust to sort out the complexities and represent them."

Trump has brought that reality home to the Republican Party.

The Republican field suffers from a lack of decisiveness, a lack of forthrightness and a lack of anger. That’s normal for politicians running for public office, but non-threatening personalities and memorized applause lines are not nearly as effective as they used to be. The base trusts passion more than professionalism.

Even before Trump, Republican candidates were advancing not on their merits, but on their willingness to be abrasive, to offend and to tell it like it is. Conservative candidates who want to edge out Trump will need more than a plan. They will need an attitude. And they will need character.

On the other side of the spectrum, Ben Carson passes the emotional purity test by avoiding the slick preparedness of the professional politician. If Trump is running on attitude, Carson is running on character. He speaks softly, he sometimes seems unprepared and his manner is casual. It should doom him, but instead it convinces voters of his integrity. He’s trustworthy because he isn’t a politician.

Carson brings sincerity to the table. In his own way, so does Trump. Both candidates engage emotions. They aren’t running on their records and they sometimes seem unsure what their own positions are.

But what people want is candidates who pass the emotional purity test.

Trump and Carson don’t like to get bogged down in details. They lay out ideas that are both big and simple. That is something that most of the rest of the field has forgotten how to do.

And both of them harness moral outrage. They don’t exist in a universe of policies, but of principles.

That is where Reagan was. That is where the rest of the field needs to be. The issues aren’t details, they’re moral choices. They’re not abstracts, but people’s lives. The obstacles are enemies. Credibility is more about conviction than another ten-point plan that few voters have the time or interest to parse.

Republican voters are looking for passion and character. Candidates who put them first will succeed. They want candidates who are as outraged about the state of things as they are. That desire isn’t limited to Republicans. Bernie Sanders’ rise is being powered by the same sense of frustration and anger.

In a landscape of antiseptic politicians, anger and clumsiness seem authentic. They humanize political candidates. Many conservatives have come to see the GOP as a mindless unfeeling machine, much like the government they are contending with. They want someone to fight that machine for them.

Republican candidates have to stop thinking about positions and start thinking about people. Inspiration has become cheap. The path to it is through principled outrage that creates the hope for political change.

David Horowitz wrote, "Because Democrats regard politics as war conducted by other means, they seek to demonize and destroy their opponents as the enemies of progress, of social justice and minority rights. Republicans can only counter these attacks by turning the Democrats’ guns around — by exposing them as the enforcers of injustice."

Injustice is the key word.

Countless millions of Americans carry the conviction that something is deeply wrong. They sense that their lives, their freedoms and their futures have become precarious. They need more than a plan. They need someone who will express the outrage they feel and fight for them.

One way or another, this election will be a referendum on the Obama years.

Republican voters do not want to be represented in that referendum by another mild-mannered politician who will sell them out and fail to give voice to the outrage at what has been done to them. They want their pain, their anger and their fear for the future to be heard. That is what Trump is doing.

That is the emotional purity test. The primaries are only a rehearsal. The real test will come in a national election when the Republican candidate will face down Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden. And all the men and women, the families that helped put him there, that spent their time and energy working to help him, will wait to see if he finally calls out their oppressors for the injustices committed against them.

They waited in vain in 2012. They don’t want to make that mistake again.

If the professional Republican candidates want to be standing there on that day representing them, they had better show them that they can do it now.

Before it’s too late.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016election; bencarson; carson; conservatism; election2016; emotion; newyork; politics; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Buttons12

No, I see a country cowed by fairies and racists. I see no salvation in politics. It’s too late to claim America is great when we slaughter babies like cattle, provide refuge to evil doers, and turn our faces from the slaughter of innocents around the world.

The fear of man is greater than the fear of God, and judgment lies at the gates. The scoffers may laugh now, but they will face the wrath of God.


61 posted on 08/27/2015 6:01:58 AM PDT by antidisestablishment (A conservative candidate needs only two things: Backbone and Balls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Simply put, the GOP base isn’t supporting Trump to be the next President, per se: they are using him as the perfect tool to attack the GOP. He’s a weapon and the GOP is the target.

We’ve come to see the party establishment as every bit as bad as the democrats.

At this point in time, it’s more important to destroy the current political structure than it is to find candidates to represent us within that structure.

Trumps ideological purity only matters if his supporters were looking for the next cog in the political system and sizing him up for quality and fit.

The GOP base is looking for a wrench to toss into the machinery. Who cares how effective the wrench is as a wrench?

The GOPe had better pay attention. This is how the current party dies, not with a whimper, but a bang.

The GOP in its current form won’t survive The Donald. That’s not a side effect, it’s primary intent.

(I support Cruz for President but I also support Trump for Wrench. If it comes down to having to elect the Wrench to jam it far enough into the machinery to cause permanent damage, I might.)


62 posted on 08/27/2015 7:07:40 AM PDT by ziravan (Didn't think it needed a /sarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer; Amntn
Internet search can be your friend sometimes:

After Saying He Doesn’t Need Donations, Trump Starts an Online Fundraiser
by Ken Meyer | 2:41 pm, August 8th, 201www.mediaite.com/online/after-saying-he-doesnt-need-donations-trump-starts-an-online-fundraiser

Donald Trump's Evolution On Campaign Fundraising
www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/25/434604383/donald-trumps-evolving-position-on-campaign-fundraising

August 08, 2015 - 01:20 PM EDT
Trump starts online thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/250655-trump-starts-online-fundraising-drive drive

63 posted on 08/27/2015 7:16:35 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I am aware that he is accepting donations from people. I just doubt your claim of receiving an email soliciting donations.


64 posted on 08/27/2015 7:20:24 AM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Amntn
Did you read any of the links at all?
He is soliciting alright. Funny enough, he is using the mailing list of Herman Cain and sending out the emails through Newsmax. It's easy enough for you to research it yourself on the internet.
65 posted on 08/27/2015 7:30:16 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Did you receive an email soliciting funds? Please post it if you did.


66 posted on 08/27/2015 7:43:47 AM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Amntn
QUOTE:
TIME’s Zeke Miller tweeted out a picture of the fundraising form. He said that the message was sent to the email supporters list of former presidential hopeful Herman Cain, in addition to Trump’s

www.mediaite.com/online/after-saying-he-doesnt-need-donations-trump-starts-an-online-fundraiser

67 posted on 08/27/2015 7:46:06 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Rather a sparkly unicorn than the low down dirty stinking rat infested GOP.

Been there, done that, ain’t doin’ it again.


68 posted on 08/27/2015 8:10:04 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

Yep.

The GOP can go to Hell.

I hate the damned thing.


69 posted on 08/27/2015 8:11:48 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

When push comes to shove, Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden’s name is gonna be on that ballot next November. Decent Americans will do their duty, whining on the Internet doesn’t frighten me into thinking otherwise.

The only thing that would worry me is some clown pulling a Perot.


70 posted on 08/27/2015 8:12:51 AM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amntn; SmokingJoe
Zeke Miller ‏@ZekeJMiller Aug 8 .@realDonaldTrump has started online fundraising (sent to the former @THEHermanCain presidential list)


71 posted on 08/27/2015 8:14:25 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Amntn; SmokingJoe

https://secure.donaldjtrump.com/donations/make-a-donation/

By clicking “Contribute” I certify that the following statements are true and accurate:

This contribution is made from my personal funds and is not drawn on an account maintained by a corporation, labor union, or national bank, and
I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident and this contribution will not be reimbursed by another person.

$2,700 is the maximum amount an individual may give for the PRIMARY election to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.

$5,400 is the maximum amount a couple may give combined for the PRIMARY election to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. If a joint contribution is made, both individuals must be listed as account holders or both must sign the check.

Contributions to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc can also take contributions for the general election at this time. An individual may give $5,400 combined for the primary and general elections. A couple may give $10,800 combined for the primary and general elections.


72 posted on 08/27/2015 8:15:31 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

EXCELLANT.......where do I send you a MEGAPHONE?


73 posted on 08/27/2015 9:01:55 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

No body is arguing that he is accepting donations.

The claim was made that he was sending out emails soliciting donations to which I stated I have made a donation to Trump and have received no such emails.

The person claiming they received the email needs to post it or I won’t believe it.

By the way, there is nothing wrong with accepting donations. He said he was not accepting large donations in return for political favors.

My donation was to let him know I appreciate what he is doing.


74 posted on 08/27/2015 9:10:58 AM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I joined the Trump campaign the day after his announcement speech. I have yet to receive a SINGLE request for a donation. I have received DOZENS of such requests(email, snail mail, and phone)from the other candidates and the RNC.

Reading comprehension is your friend.


75 posted on 08/27/2015 9:51:35 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Amntn

Okay. Just trying to help with your request.

BTW, no one says that they accept donations for political favors.


76 posted on 08/27/2015 10:25:31 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover
There is only one way to win conservatives back, and that is do what they were voted in to do, and do it before the 2016 Presidential election. Since they won’t, there is no winning conservatives back!

Amen!
77 posted on 08/27/2015 10:37:20 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer
Totally irrelevant what you have and have not received. FACT: Trump has sent out emails soliciting for money. FACT: Amongst other thing nags, he is using Herman Cain's mailing list to solicit(don't ask my why). FACT: He is using Newsmax as one of the outfits to send out the soliciting emails.
I have provided links to back up every single one of those assertions. Trouble is you don't seem to be able to read much of anything, never mind comprehending it.
78 posted on 08/27/2015 11:28:18 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Well, i’m on TRUMP’s mailing list, not Herman Cain’s. And I STILL haven’t been spammed for money by Trump. Neither has any other Trump supporter I know.

Can you explain why the Trump Campaign would chum “Herman Cain’s mailing list” for money(lol)and not his OWN?


79 posted on 08/27/2015 11:46:30 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer

See post # 71 and 72.
I have no idea why Trump is using Herman Cain’s lists.


80 posted on 08/27/2015 12:16:29 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson