Skip to comments.
Obama: New citizens can skip pledge to take up arms and defend the U.S.
The Washington Examiner ^
| 7/21/15
| Pete Kasperowicz
Posted on 07/22/2015 1:25:43 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on Tuesday said it will no longer require incoming U.S. citizens to pledge that they will "bear arms on behalf of the United States" or "perform noncombatant service" in the Armed Forces as part of the naturalization process.
Those lines are in the Oath of Allegiance that people recite as they become U.S. citizens. But USCIS said people "may" be able to exclude those phrases for reasons related to religion or if they have a conscientious objection.
USCIS said people with certain religious training or with a "deeply held moral or ethical code" may not have to say the phrases as they are naturalized.
The agency said people don't have to belong to a specific church or religion to use this exemption, and may attest to U.S. officials administering the oath that they have these beliefs.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; betrayal; braking; breaking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Does it appear that the fifth columnists who've been welcomed into our Federal government are feeling inadequate and in need of reinforcements?
To: Avoiding_Sulla
“Yeah, join those of us who wish to take a dump on the place”.
To: Avoiding_Sulla
3
posted on
07/22/2015 1:26:51 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
Obama wishes he could have skipped that part /Sarc
4
posted on
07/22/2015 1:26:52 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
If you like your jihad, you can keep your jihad.
5
posted on
07/22/2015 1:27:07 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
So if there comes an unfortunate time that a draft is instituted again, they don’t have to go?
6
posted on
07/22/2015 1:27:39 PM PDT
by
Marko413
To: Avoiding_Sulla
Obama doesn’t want to ask his new immigrants to do anything he wouldn’t do himself.
7
posted on
07/22/2015 1:27:45 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: Avoiding_Sulla
Yeah well, people with certain religious training or with a “deeply held moral or ethical code” DON’T have to be allowed into this country.
8
posted on
07/22/2015 1:27:55 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
New U.S. Citizens must instead vow the following oath:
“I pledge to vote Democrat, maximize my use of social services, refuse to work, reproduce at alarming rates, support America’s enemies, and generally scare the hell out of native born American Citizens.”
9
posted on
07/22/2015 1:28:31 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(WSJs approval of law-breaking and disdain for the Bill of Rights reveals anti-American principles)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
The hits just keep on coming.
10
posted on
07/22/2015 1:29:05 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
11
posted on
07/22/2015 1:29:30 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
Am I living in a nightmare or something?
12
posted on
07/22/2015 1:30:27 PM PDT
by
rdl6989
To: Avoiding_Sulla
To: Avoiding_Sulla
An Islam exception (promising to bear arms for an infidel nation is harem in Islam).
14
posted on
07/22/2015 1:31:29 PM PDT
by
piytar
(Good will be called evil and Evil will be called good.)
To: Uncle Miltie
15
posted on
07/22/2015 1:32:20 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Bkmrk seconded. (Shakes head in disgust)
16
posted on
07/22/2015 1:32:22 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
("I wish we were back in the world of Andy Williams." - My mother, 1938-2013, RIP)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
USCIS said people with certain religious training or with a "deeply held moral or ethical code" may not have to
You mean like the Little Sisters of the Poor?
To: Marko413
Wouldn’t effect that at all. It’s just the pledge, it doesn’t actually MEAN anything legally other than once they’re done saying it they’re citizens with all the benefits and obligations (including being drafted if they’re the right age).
18
posted on
07/22/2015 1:33:03 PM PDT
by
discostu
(It always comes down to cortexifan)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Inconsistency is consistency.
19
posted on
07/22/2015 1:33:23 PM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(Fear govts that never dis & often employ Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
The nightmare continues.. Someone please wake me up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson