|
 |
|
|
Ping!
‘age of the baby’? So you’re both admitting it’s a baby and saying that it’s OK to kill it?
I don’t want to vote for The Donald, but I do want him to continue lobbing hand-grenades into the Uniparty vipers’ nest so we can nominate Ted.
It’s too early to take out our stalking horse, don’t you think?
You’re either for life, or your not. There is no “Depends”.
The other candidates aren’t going to do a damn thing about it.
They may offer some cheap and useless talk but they’re not going to do a damn thing about it.
If he would get rid of the taxpayer funding of abortion in obamacare, that would be a good start.
What are the others offering?
—
By the way, Cruz is still my favorite.
Those who support him for the Republican nomination do so with that knowledge.
The relevant question is: Mr. Trump, what sort of judges would you nominate for the US Supreme Court?
That’s the only place significant changes in abortion law might originate, as well as gay marriage and other issues.
Pro-life except for that truckload of exceptions. I like the way it was stated- Pro life except (where anti-life). Pro-life except where he supports genetic cleansing.
He is asked about abortion and he says only rape, incest, life of abortion exceptions. The interviewer asks what if a woman is pregnant and has an abortion. Trump actually says “it depends when” but then he’s interrupted and then he goes on, “it has to be in one of those 3 categories” (rape, incest, life of mother).
This means either that (1) the interruption gave him a chance to think, and he was correcting it to “it must be in one of those 3 categories.” Or, it could mean (2)that he has one view about those that ARE taking place, and that he has another view about those that are justifiable. For those that ARE taking place he finds later term abortions to be abhorrent.
Another interesting thing he says at the outset is that this is the first time he’s ever been asked this...by a reporter, I suppose he means.
We also know he’s a convert to pro-life from back in 2011 or so. He could still be working out some of what he thinks. He should read Reagan’s book.
Anyone unhappy with Trump’s position(s) today need not worry. They will surely be different tomorrow.
remember Trump’s treatment of his wife Marla and her unplanned (by him) pregnancy
at the time it was said she gave up her marriage rather than abort the baby
maybe this was just her version of events, but I remember
Trump is enjoying heaps of accolades on his position regarding illegals, I to support his aggressive approach, but there is at least one out severeal leadership traits he does not possess, he is not TRUSTWORTHY, you can’t fool all the people all the time.
There is much to like about Trump right now and there will be revealed much more not like forthcoming, what you see on the label is not what you will get when you open the package.
Battling the enemy without and with... CRUZ 2016!
He should have said “I’m pro-Life and abortion is settled Law in America”PERIOD:-)
“Conservatives” (or so they claim to be) had no problem trading the life if a baby for a win with a guy that personally funded their death so I don’t imagine “conservatives’ (or so they claim to be) will have any issue with this at all.
Because thats exactly what many millions did. Fortunately some are smart enough to realize their error. Others intend to compound it for the cost of more dead babies. ‘No Matter What”.
Call me crazy but that’s some pretty greater ‘lesser evil’.
Trump is so totally a plant to siphon off Cruz votes.
yes disappointing , Fox was showing recent and past clips today.