Posted on 06/29/2015 1:44:06 PM PDT by Zakeet
States not permitted to alter federal voter registration form to require proof of citizenship.
The Supreme Court today refused to accept a case which sought to allow states to supplement a federal voter registration form so as to require proof of citizenship to vote.
Such proof is particularly important given how freely many states are handing out drivers licenses to illegal immigrants, and the Obama administration’s unilateral implementation of quasi-amnesty deferrals (some of which were stopped in court). It’s just not enough anymore that someone is here legally (or at least, is not being deported)
[Snip]
This is not just a battle of forms. It’s a battle for preventing theft of elections.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Could put it on the ballot application form you fill out at the polling place. The feds will throw a tantrum and make the state remove it like they did Michigan but we can make them fight it.
Justice Roberts is correct...it is not the job of SCOTUS to remedy a badly written law. Hold the congress critters and the president responsible.
So long as we keep electing likes of Obama, be ready and willing to get hosed.
You’re right.
Kennedy was appointed by Ronald Reagan. Should we have voted for Mondale?
I know, right? (i hate that phrase, but I just can’t help myself this time). If we just take the House...if we just take the Senate and Congress...if we just take the White House...it’ll be like the ‘rats never left.
INS will, cough,cough, will soon issue voter ID.
Our world planned and controlled by Harvard and Yale fascists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Managerial_state
What does that have to do with all the open liars that didn’t lift a finger to keep their promise of holding feet to the fire in exchange for good people abandoning their conservative principles?
Shaking My Head Ping!
It’s time for a revolt. Time out - adults have to take over.
What idiot actually asked permission to do that? The states should just go ahead and do it. You mean, there is no governor who will stand up and tell the Supreme Court to go to hell.
Reads fine to me. You just hate the fact that the lesser evils got what they asked for and now are pissed about it.
Why again are the feds involved in s state issue?
Check my tagline....
This SCOTUS session is the biggest disaster to hit the USA since 9/11!
In some ways it is worse!
The U.S. Election Assistance Commission politburo can overrule state powers under Article I Section 2 and the 17th Amendment.
But I'm constantly told that an Article V state convention to propose amendments is dangerous.
The coup de grace of the Republic.
I repeat;
“Supreme Court Ruling Of The United State
SCROTUS for short”
That’s nonsense. The wording on the Act as quite clear, and Gruber had said it was deliberately stated that way, for a reason. The court has a responsibility to prevent the Executive from rewriting laws passed by Congress, and it failed to do so. Since it is acting lawlessly, IMO the people have the right to disobey their laws also.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.