Posted on 06/29/2015 9:43:44 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
Last weeks 5-4 Supreme Court decision declaring same-sex marriage to be a constitutionally protected right in all 50 states is setting up battle lines across the country, with many church leaders and some state officials indicating they will stand firm in protecting the religious liberty of those who find the high courts decision morally offensive.
Theres even a high-profile law enforcement figure who has taken to social media with a warning about the cultural rot associated with the courts declaration that gay marriage is legal across the country, despite what individual states and their residents might say. Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, well known and highly regarded in conservative circles, made a bold and provocative prediction on his Twitter feed over the weekend, saying that todays anger over the Supreme Court decision will turn to rage, then revolt.
Given Sheriff Clarkes very public positions on support for the Second Amendment, for Americas police forces, and opposition to numerous policies of President Obama and his liberal supporters, its little wonder that his tweet drew a lot of passionate responses from his more than 64,000 followers. Quite a few respondents encouraged Sheriff Clarke to become a prominent leader of the opposition, so to speak, beyond his frequent criticism of the sharp left turn the country is making.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
He sure does!
I’m pretty sure CONgress has the power to impeach a Supreme Court justice, just like they can impeach a lesser judge or a sitting President.
But they won’t.
I TOTALLY AGREE with you.
When he speaks I DO NOT see COLOR.
I SEE and HEAR someone speaking like a TRUE AMERICAN.
They do. It's called impeachment. Abrogating their oaths of office certainly meets the standard of High Crime and misdemeanor to remove them from their position.
Excellent post.
I agree with the sheriff, the seeds of a new American Revolution have been sown
Impeach them and replace them with who? More of zero’s choice, liberal appointees? Guess we’ll have to ride out this storm - for now anyway.
The way to attack this is to run to the courthouse and file for a polygamous/incestuous marriage using the SAME original filing in Obergefell v. Hodge, substituting for “homosexual” or “gay” as appropriate.
Now that marriage means nothing, lets make it clear it means nothing.
Don't you think that it would set a very dangerous precedent to impeach judges because you didn't like their decisions???
He’s the very best, bar none!
Thanks afraidfortherepublic.
I love this guy, in a platonic, brotherly fashion of course.
This is my sheriff. :)
“Don’t you think that it would set a very dangerous precedent to impeach judges because you didn’t like their decisions?”
That is not the case here. It is imperative to remove judges who act criminally, illegally, unconstitutionally, and unethically. It is not a matter of what people “like”.
Wait a minute!
Isn’t it RACIST! to use any other word as the ‘R’ than RACIST!
Oh wait... is it RACIST! To even mention the word RACIST! unless one is of the correct RACE?
Yeah.
Congress can regulate anything the Supreme Court does.
Congress can overturn a Supreme Court ruling.
Why?
Because only Congress can make law.
The Supreme Court did not have any legal basis for their ruling on Friday.
The members of Congress have taken an oath to defend and protect the Constitution.
We dont need a Constitutional Amendment, Congress can pass legislation invalidating the Supreme Court decision and remanding the issue back to the states.
It is that simple.
If true, it is the best news I have heard in over 6 years.
Maybe he’ll do a Vince Foster and decide to take a trip to a park and shoot himself after he’s been dead a few hours.
That was a great trick old Vince pulled. Still has people fooled how he did it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.