..."increase the risk of homicide of women by 500%." WTH! That's a new number to me. All this time I thought it was 120%. I'm sure they have plenty of backup data to verify these numbers. (sarc)
1 posted on
03/24/2015 10:18:25 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
Moms are racist.
What about all the gun violence blacks endure?
((crickets))
Only one thing is clear. These Moms must be racist.
2 posted on
03/24/2015 10:22:02 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
To: rktman
The number is whatever percentage they need to properly panic people into acting in the way they want.
It isn’t about the number, the real number doesn’t matter.
what matters to them is the end result.
3 posted on
03/24/2015 10:22:13 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: rktman; GOPsterinMA
80% of statistics are 300% bullspit.
99% of statistics from feminazis are 1000% bullspit.
4 posted on
03/24/2015 10:23:51 AM PDT by
Impy
(They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
To: rktman
Extension of the War-on-Women shtick.
5 posted on
03/24/2015 10:23:54 AM PDT by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: rktman
So why doesn’t someone invent a gun that would know it is pointed at a woman and then would jam up? Problem would be with transgenders.
To: rktman
To Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense, get your own guns and leave mine alone, you cheapskates.
7 posted on
03/24/2015 10:24:52 AM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: rktman
Maybe if the woman had a gun she could shoot the SOB who would try to rape or rob her.
8 posted on
03/24/2015 10:28:00 AM PDT by
brooklyn dave
(IF YOU TAKE THE STATE'S NICKEL, YOU GET THE STATE'S NOOSE)
To: rktman
In reality, the vast majority of men can win at whatever level of victory they choose in a physical confrontation against the average woman or against a women they choose to attack. When a woman chooses to arm herself, she is the equal of any man. I suspect a lot of liberals prefer the situation in which women are at the mercy of predators to that in which predators have to fear armed victims turning the tables on them.
![](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/81pkZAWU3aL._SL1500_.jpg)
9 posted on
03/24/2015 10:28:22 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: rktman
“Conversation” = “Shut up and do what I say”
10 posted on
03/24/2015 10:29:04 AM PDT by
Zathras
To: rktman
Guns are the great equalizer. Limiting the access women currently have will not reduce violence against them. Quite the opposite.
These groups are so transparent.
11 posted on
03/24/2015 10:30:30 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: rktman
Lies.
Damn Lies.
Statistics.
12 posted on
03/24/2015 10:32:03 AM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
To: rktman
Gun violence against men will still be acceptable.
To: rktman
HMMMMMM.... let’s see....... restrict ownership of guns making it harder (or outright illegal) for a law-abiding woman to own a gun as a means to defend themselves from violent attack.
...and this will make women safer.
hmmmm
hmmmm
But....
hmmmmm
I don’t... I... WHAT?
14 posted on
03/24/2015 10:39:40 AM PDT by
envisio
(I ain't here long... I'm out of napalm and .22 bullets.)
To: rktman
“Moms Demand”
Typical female bulls*it.
You’re supposed to be empowered women, go defend yourself against your mythical gun violence, and leave sane people alone.
To: rktman
When you are lying about statistics, you need to go big. The rest you can pull out of your a**. LOL
To: rktman
According to Moore, the presence of a gun in domestic violence situations increase the risk of homicide of women by 500%. Is that 500% PER gun?
;-)
19 posted on
03/24/2015 11:09:18 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
To: rktman
If a criminal breaks into their home to kill their children, do you think these “moms” will call a shrink to talk to the thug about his feelings so that it will dissuade him and there will be hugs all around?
Or will she call a good guy with a gun?
To: rktman
“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.” - Albert
Einstein
To: rktman
Moms Demand Gun Action wants stricter gun laws to reduce violence against womenRIGHT! Because the ONLY weapon used against women, is a GUN!
Besides, women cannot use a firearm against a stronger and younger male. It's UNPOSSIBLE!
22 posted on
03/24/2015 11:32:06 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(The FCC takeover of the internet will quickly become a means to censorship of dissent.)
To: rktman
John Lott says that if you read the study that they cite, that the actual numbers show that women who live by themselves and have guns are less likely to be attacked than those who do not have guns.
I have tried to find the actual “study” which was done by the heavily partisan Mayors Against Illegal Guns, funded by Mayor Bloomberg. It is not easy to come by. If anyone has access to it, please let me know.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson