Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Fair and Relevant Question: After 8 Years of Obama, Why Should GOP Nominate a One-Term Senator?
Red State ^ | 03/23/2015 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 03/23/2015 7:56:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

With Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) beginning his run for the Presidency today, I should make public the question I've suggested to reporters in private.

Senator Cruz is for certain going to be joined by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who will announce in a few weeks.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who I think is underrated in his bid for the Presidency even though Jeb Bush is intent on locking up Florida, will also most likely declare his candidacy.

All three of these men would make excellent Presidents. I know them personally. I backed them when they were at single digits in the polls. I pray for them regularly. I like them all.

Still, I think they have to answer a question those who come from Governor's Mansions will not. That question is this:

For six years, Republicans have said the nation made a mistake electing a one term Senator the President of the United States. Why should you, a one term Senator, be the GOP's nominee?

Given Republican rhetoric against President Obama for six years, it is fair and relevant. I look forward to their answers.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: Kentucky; US: New Jersey; US: Texas; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016election; chrischristie; cino; election2016; erickerickson; florida; gop; jebbush; lino; marcorubio; newjersey; paultardation; paultardnoisemachine; potus; randpaulnoisemachine; randsconcerntrolls; scottwalker; shill; tedcruz; texas; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: dragnet2

.
Erickson is a soft-headed mushy middler, and is not qualified to select any question but what he has for dinner.
.


101 posted on 03/24/2015 7:36:32 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I’m impressed he attended Hahvahd, and that he has the values he has. That’s quite an accomplishment.


102 posted on 03/24/2015 8:02:52 PM PDT by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

By chance, did she fall out of the airplane?


103 posted on 03/24/2015 8:05:40 PM PDT by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
I want a President who actually cares about my Country, from a standpoint of really understanding it, its founding, and its Constitution.

That, to me, is one of the fundamental traits of a true American president, and one which I've seen in Ted Cruz since the first time I saw him.

He's only reinforced my early perceptions of him, since then.

The times we're in demand such a person at the helm. Our nation is on a dangerous precipice, and needs a skilled, wise, and confident leader to steer us back from the brink.

104 posted on 03/24/2015 8:39:44 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

> By chance, did she fall out of the airplane?

No. They said they weren’t able to save everyone. That she got trapped in the fuselage I think as it went under. I imagine the truth is she was probably drugged with a poison that is undetectable or leaves the body within a short time. There are quite a few. If they don’t use the right screen it won’t pickup the presence of the poison anyway.


105 posted on 03/25/2015 2:28:00 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
< Erickson is a soft-headed mushy middler, and is not qualified to select any question but what he has for dinner. I'd say you are right but he probably wants the government to do that or everyone too except himself, of course. You know Ithink the physical appearance of liberals often tells me as much about them as their pimp blogging and it never fails to surprise me everytime I lookup their pics. I'm going to guess he probably does agree with Moochie that the government should regulate what we eat, or should I say what "everyone else" should eat because we know the rules never apply to them just the "little people":
106 posted on 03/25/2015 2:39:14 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because They are not Muslim/Communist lovers? Jes’ sayin’.


107 posted on 03/25/2015 2:51:54 AM PDT by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because when Cruz is elected I only hope he is as extreme and determined in pursuing his agenda as Obama was. He needs no “experience” on whoring statism to be our Chief Executive Oncologist.


108 posted on 03/25/2015 3:07:13 AM PDT by Theophilus (Be as prolific as you are pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Cruz is the Anti-Obama.


109 posted on 03/25/2015 3:20:11 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Rand Paul On Shutdown: "Even Though It Appeared I Was Participating In It, It Was A Dumb Idea"
I said throughout the whole battle that shutting down the government was a dumb idea. Even though it did appear as if I was participating in it, I said it was a dumb idea. And the reason I voted for it, though, is that it's a conundrum. Here's the conundrum. We have a $17 trillion debt and people at home tell me you can't give the president a blank check. We just can't keep raising the debt ceiling without conditions. So unconditionally raising the debt ceiling, nobody at home wants me to vote for that and I can't vote for that. But the conundrum is if I don't we do approach these deadlines. So there is an impasse. In 2011, though, we had this impasse and the president did negotiate. We got the sequester. If we were to extend the sequester from discretionary spending to all the entitlements we would actually fix our problem within a few years.
[Posted on 11/19/2013 12:16:51 PM by Third Person]
Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance
...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.
[Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]
Rand Paul's immigration speech
...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.

Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.

Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.

Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.

If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...

This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.

Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
[Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg]
Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
Latinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...
[Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
[but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]
Rand Slams Congress for Funding Egypt's Generals: 'How Does Your Conscience Feel Now?'
Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt's military -- even as Cairo's security forces massacre anti-government activists. [by "anti-government activists" is meant church-burning Christian-murdering jihadists]
[Posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:10 PM PDT by Hoodat]

110 posted on 04/05/2015 4:00:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson