"Muslims are evil and should be killed."
Beeyatch
It’s Vox. ‘nuff said.
Translation: All these sheeple seeing this movie goofs up our messaging for 2016 and beyond.
Translation: When we can’t attack the substance of an argument, we can always fall back on the moral equivalency defense and claim that the opponent has “oversimplified” the reality. Clint Eastwood didn’t buy our anti-American narrative so he’s a moron and a simpleton who can’t see and appreciate the subtleties of this subject. By extension, anyone who enjoys this movie is also a drooling rube who doesn’t know his Chablis from his Chardonnay.
“which can only be honestly portrayed in shades of gray”
yeah, right. and how many OTHER movies “portray” ANYTHING in “shades of gray”? BTW, do you think Amanada, if given the money and the task, would make a nuanced movie about the Iraqi war presenting all sides equally? Yeah, that’s what i thought. her real objection is that the movie presents a point of view she disagrees with.
and speaking of different view points, i notice vox allows no dissent since commenting isn’t available, which means vox wants to keep its propaganda pure.
This review would be more accurate if it was about the movie “Selma”.
Liberals love shades of gray.
It lets them weasel out of responsibility for everything.
It is why President Bush, with all his faults that are well established, understood that to do the right thing, you had to boil away shades of gray and take action.
It is called war.
Amanda Taub, has her butt puckered six ways to Sunday over a movie because it portrays the world differently than she wants it to be: sunshine and lollipops all the time except for the people she hates -us.
The Leftist has a history of anti-Christian rants.
Where is the BARF ALERT?
Vox’s Amanda Taub: Reax to Canada Attack Shows ‘We’ Are Biased Against Islam
By Tom Blumer | October 23, 2014 | 5:45 PM EDT
Taking the web site even further down the path of useless, pretentious collection of hackery than it already is and that’s quite far Vox.com has tweeted (HT Twitchy) that “Our obsession with the Ottawa shooter’s religion reveals more about us than about him.” It must be a shock to their system to learn that a lot of “us” would rather not be cut down by a member of the alleged “Religion of Peace.”
Why must movies and sports be held to an absolute lines of integrity, while the police, the courts, politicians and the press are held to no standards at all?
I think Amanda would be more comfortable shouting “Hands up! Don’t shoot!” while burning down a 7-Eleven in honor of Saint Swisher Sweets.
So a movie can be either “black and white” or “shades of gray.”
This in itself is black and white thinking.
Liberals never get this.
the reporter is a shmuck
“[T]his movie feeds the narrative that the civilized world is at war with Muslims, that the only solution is to respond with crushing violence, and that people who refuse to believe that are naïfs sheep, rather who are dangerously undermining America’s security.”
And? So? That’s the correct “narrative.”
Not everything is a shade of gray.
I’ve noticed one difference between liberals and conservatives, that does not call upon morals or intellect for validity.
The world may well be more complex than conservatives imagine’ but it is far less complex than liberals make it.
Conservatives look a problem, and much like an engineer, attempt to breaak it down into smaller, more manageable problems, then reassemble it.
Liberals look a a problem and resist this path, preferring to solve all the components at once, while ignoring those little glitches that spring up along the way.
Which approach is more likely to solve the problem?
Amanda Taub, "Senior Sadness Correspondent", likes to do Shetland ponies!
I swear I'm not making this up! ROFL
I believe that this organization calling itself “Vox” is synonymous with liar. It is best to just denounce anything that comes from that direction and move on.
She’s just mad it didn’t elevate her Al Queda heroes and the drilling scene made her mad.
Pray America is waking